FDA is not even trying anymore;
The decision is based on PFIZER data not MODERNA data, which they acknowledge in today's letter
There is literally have NO EVIDENCE for boosting MODERNA at month 5 👇👇
Gruber & Krause resign & FDA is unhinged
The decision is based on PFIZER data not MODERNA data, which they acknowledge in today's letter
There is literally have NO EVIDENCE for boosting MODERNA at month 5 👇👇
Gruber & Krause resign & FDA is unhinged
https://twitter.com/davidalim/status/1479446735881707532
Moderna's dose is 100, 100, and 50 for booster;
Pfizer is 30, 30, 30
Moderna has WAY more myocarditis
it is NOT REASONABLE to make a Moderna determination from Pfizer data
Pfizer is 30, 30, 30
Moderna has WAY more myocarditis
it is NOT REASONABLE to make a Moderna determination from Pfizer data
FDA has never, to my knowledge, changed a label for 1 product based on data from a completely different product, given at a different dose, with different rates of adverse events
This is a bigger deal than Exondys and Aducanumab
This means there is no need for any data for FDA regulatory action
The future will be bleak
This means there is no need for any data for FDA regulatory action
The future will be bleak
Obviously, this will change existing booster mandates for Moderna recipients to move them up to month 5 or people will be fired.
No safety or efficacy data will support that mandate
amazing
No safety or efficacy data will support that mandate
amazing
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
