. @HertsPolice tell @MailOnline that Specials have more discretion over uniform standards than regular police.
It's not what their handbook says
The Handbook says that in training student officers sign a contract including standards of behaviour and dress
Being appropriately equiped for duty is an officer's responsibility
- Uniform standards are the same for Specials as regular officers
- You need to adhere to what is an acceptable standard
- Supervisory officers are responsible for checking
It is very clear on jewellery, make up and nail polish.
NB: it doesn't say no make up, it says discrete
Glittery green & red nails is not discrete
Standards are not just about health and safety but conveying professionalism and integrity
Particularly for recruitment events
Herts police in their recruitment publicity showed an officer breaching these standards, on two separate occasions.
When people complained on Twitter the police threatened to report them.
My complaint got this response (from the Corporate Communications Team!)
Officers are encouraged to follow the uniform policy
...but it may not reflect modern culture
... Officers are given supportive advice over breaches of uniform
... In this instance we are very comfortable
So Herts police only "encourage" officers to follow rules 🤔
And when they breach them they threaten the public who complain 😡
And say they feel "very comfortable" with officers not following rules 🤯
What other rules are officers allowed to break @HertsPolice ?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I gave evidence in the Sandie Peggie case because the hospital board & male Dr refused to accept as findings of fact that that men are more likely to commit violent & sexual crimes, that men are more dangerous to women, so women are more heavily impacted by men in their spaces than vice versa.
You can read my witness statement here.
These are the facts it attests to.
You don't need a degree of any sort to understand these facts.
I've written to @stonewalluk CEO Simon Blake applauding his leadership in discarding Stonewall's previous extreme and divisive definition of "transphobia".
And explaining the damage that it did.
It's not good enough to quietly back away from it after doubling down for so long
It said that Stonewall's guidance was in line with the Equality Act 🤨
The government's @oeogovuk has recently admitted it is a clear misinterpretation of the law to suggest that the Equality Act requires allowing people to access opposite sex facilities because they have the protected characteristic of "gender reassignment" gov.uk/government/pub…
15 months after calling me in for questioning about a tweet, and having sat on the CPS decision that there was no crime for 2 months, the Met bothered to call me up at 7pm this evening to tell me, and then put out this press statement. 🙄
#TheProcessIsThePunishment
Here is the tweet over which they wasted their time, my time, my lawyers time and taxpayers' money.
Minister for Women & Equalities says "We are proud of the EqAct & the rights & protections it affords women. The Govt does not plan to amend legal definitions in the act.”
Hundreds of women are going to Parliament on Wednesday to ask the govt to rethink.
It took 22 more years before 1919 the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act was passed permitting women to become join professions and to become lawyers and civil servants and to sit on juries.