. @HertsPolice tell @MailOnline that Specials have more discretion over uniform standards than regular police.
It's not what their handbook says
The Handbook says that in training student officers sign a contract including standards of behaviour and dress
Being appropriately equiped for duty is an officer's responsibility
- Uniform standards are the same for Specials as regular officers
- You need to adhere to what is an acceptable standard
- Supervisory officers are responsible for checking
It is very clear on jewellery, make up and nail polish.
NB: it doesn't say no make up, it says discrete
Glittery green & red nails is not discrete
Standards are not just about health and safety but conveying professionalism and integrity
Particularly for recruitment events
Herts police in their recruitment publicity showed an officer breaching these standards, on two separate occasions.
When people complained on Twitter the police threatened to report them.
My complaint got this response (from the Corporate Communications Team!)
Officers are encouraged to follow the uniform policy
...but it may not reflect modern culture
... Officers are given supportive advice over breaches of uniform
... In this instance we are very comfortable
So Herts police only "encourage" officers to follow rules 🤔
And when they breach them they threaten the public who complain 😡
And say they feel "very comfortable" with officers not following rules 🤯
What other rules are officers allowed to break @HertsPolice ?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Peter Wilkins case exposes another public body (this one part of @DefenceHQ) that lost sight of the Equality Act and of civil service principles of impartiality and objectivity.
One colleague accused him of making a "threatening" FOI request when he tried to draw attention to @dstlmod 's Line Manager’s Guide.
The FOI was turned down but I tried again.
At first DSTL said they couldn't find the document.
I said "have another look, its on your intranet" and they located it.
Then they thought long and hard about whether they could withhold it on security grounds.
Lynn O'Donnell had writen a document entitled Line Managers Guide to supporting LGBT+ Identifying staff.
It included the old Stonewall definition of transphobia (which has now been withdrawn).
The action starts not long after the Forstater EAT judgment.
Prof Sophie Scott is awarded the Faraday Prize and O'Donnell goes onto DSTL's "distillery" chat forum to say 'tis a pity she's a TERF....and linked GC views to rise in violence against LGBT people
The High Court has granted an anonymity order in relation to three individual "trans and intersex" claimants in the Good Law Project's case against EHRC for its interim update.
The nomination of Mary-Ann Stephenson as new chair of the EHRC brought the witch hunters out.
Stephenson has a PhD in equality law. She is Director of the Women’s Budget Group, and has been director of the Fawcett Society, chair of the Early Education and Childcare Coalition and a board member of Coventry Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre.
A bunch of charity CEOs (some of whom are part of "Equally Ours" with her) wrote a letter saying darkly she "previously supported views seen at odds with inclusivity for all"
There was a petition accusing her of making "anti-trans statements" and "association with groups advocating for the curtailment of trans people's human rights"