Jim Bianco Profile picture
Jan 9, 2022 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
1/14

In some respects, what happened in bond markets last week was epic, something we might be talking about for many years.

A thread to explain
2/14

When discussing bond market moves, I believe the best metric is total return. It encompasses both price change and the level of yields (accrued interest).

The next set of charts show calendar week total returns. That is, the week ending Friday (Thursday if a holiday).
3/14

The 30-year data goes back to 1973 and last week was the worst calendar week total return in at least 49-year history! The long-bond lost 9.35%!!

If this was a year, a 9.35% total return loss would be the 5-year worst year ever.

Impressive for five days of work. Image
4/14

The 10-year note finished it worst week in 42 years, with a total return loss of 4.24%.

Only Feb 1980 saw a bigger loss for a calendar week loss (Volcker inflation panic, funds rate headed to 21%)

-4.24% would also be the fifth worst YEAR ever. Image
5/14

Finally,

The calendar week total return for the Bloomberg 10+ TIPS Index was -6.09%.

This marks the third worst week ever. Image
6/14

Note above each one of the other marked weeks were significant.

*3/13/20, -14.39% = peak COVID Panic Fed buying $100B/day of bonds

* 9/13/19, -5.19% = The week the repo mkt blew up

* 6/21/13, -5.12% = The height of the taper tantrum

* 10/10/08, -7.13% = Lehman failed.
7/14

Why was last week so epic?

I believe the whole bond market finally realized that easy money is over/QT is coming.

For weeks many bond players argued this table was wrong, the Fed would go less than 4 hikes/no QT. Not after last week's FOMC minutes. Image
8/14

What about TIPS and narrowing break evens?

As the right chart shows, the Fed took over this market. They now own 25% of this market, up from less than 10% pre-pandemic.

The left chart shows the Fed has bought more TIPS than the Treasury issued the last two years!! ImageImage
9/14

TIPS are no longer a market signal about inflation expectations, the Fed ruined this with its big footprint.

TIPS are flow driven and flows are dominated by expectations of the speed of the Fed printer.
10/14

So, 3 or 4 hikes coming? QT coming? The most vulnerable market to the Fed printer gets killed. TIPS yields soar and BE's fall.

Again, not a signal about inflation. A signal about a loss of Fed liquidity coming. ImageImage
11/14

Simply put, the bond market saw one of its worst weeks in history because bond market players finally "got it" that the Fed is going to end liquidity.

This kicked off a big the scramble to get out and not be the "bond bag holder" when the Fed printer is turned off.
12/14

This naturally begs the question, what about the stock market? The S&P was down -1.9%, hardly an epic week. What is going on here?

Hate to say it, but the stock market is NOT a leading indicator among FINANCIAL MARKETS.
13/14

Or the stock mkt the "slow kid" as it turns last.

2002 it bottomed AFTER the recession ended (Nov 2001) for the first time in 100 years

2007 it peaked after housing/bond market peaked in 2006

2009 stocks bottomed after the bond market in credit bottomed in late 2008.
14/14

So, if the bond market is having epic convulsions in the wake Fed printer getting turned off, do not take solace that the stock market "doesn't get it."

This is how financial markets turn, the stock market often stays too long and turns last.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Bianco

Jim Bianco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biancoresearch

Feb 7
1/4

I fear this is spot on.

@CryptoNobler's thread unpacks $BTC's "synthetic supply" problem. ETFs, structured notes (@CryptoHayes), futures, options, swaps, lending—all flood the system with "paper" BTC.

When it swamps real demand, price crashes.

x.com/CryptoNobler/s… x.com/coinbureau/sta…
2/4

@CryptoHayes: structured notes on $IBIT flooded $BTC with synthetic supply → forced liquidations turbocharged the dump.

Next rally? TradFi piles into ETFs → Wall Street "prints" more synthetics.

Price discovery decoupled from on-chain.

Volatility on steroids
3/4

Wall Street's entry turned BTC into a pseudo-fractional reserve system.

21M cap? On-chain only—price discovery swims in synthetic street "printing."

Fractional is inherently unstable. That's why banks need heavy regs (Fed/Treasury/OCC/FDIC).

On-chain BTC only needs code.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
1/6

10% of the outstanding $BTC is held by $MSTR and the 11 Spot BTC ETFs.

These are the ways normies hold $BTC in regulated brokerage accounts.

Collectively, the avg purchase price is $85.36K, meaning the average is now ~$8k underwater, with an unrealized loss of ~$7B.
🧵 Image
2/6

The 11 biggest spot $BTC ETFs now hold 1.29M $BTC – worth over $115B (Friday PM).

These ETFs hold roughly 6.5% of all $BTC in circulation.

The 3 largest – iShares’ $IBIT (blue), Fidelity’s $FBTC (red), and Grayscale’s $GBTC (orange) – hold 5.65%. Image
3/6

The 11 Spot $BTC ETFs average purchase price is ~$90.2K (blue), about $13K (16%) above the current price (bottom panel).

Note these ETFs are collectively on a record 10 consecutive outflow days. $BTC is down ~8% since Friday's NYSE close. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 19
1/11

What is Housing?

Affordable shelter or path to retirement?

It cannot be both.

We tried to make it both in the early 2000s and almost wrecked the financial system.

🧵 Image
2/11

The average home price is $417K (above), an all-time high.

This means around 43% of a median household income (~$84K) goes to housing.

For the last three years, this has been comparable to the (unsustainable) housing peak in 2006. Image
3/11

For 50 years, from the end of World War II through 1997 (red box), housing was affordable. Prices rose by the inflation rate.

In other words, it held its value but remained within reach of most renters/first-time homebuyers. Image
Read 11 tweets
Jan 4
1/5

Thoughts on market reaction to the Venezuela news.

tl:dr

The spigot in Venezuela waiting to be opened to flood the world with crude oil and lower its price has been broken for a while.

It will take several years to fix it.
2/5

Venezuela is a founding member of OPEC their official statistics show its production (blue) is down 71% from its 1998 peak.

Its sustainable capacity (max output in within 90 days and held for a year) is 1M barrels/day (orange).

Venezuela is at its maximum now. Image
3/5

Why the big production decline?

Socialist Hugo Chávez was elected in December 1998. He turned out to be a brutal dictator. Only to be replaced by an even more brutal dictator, Nicolás Maduro, when Chávez died in March 2013.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 27, 2025
1/7

This analysis concludes by saying "something is seriously wrong with the housing market."

Not based on this chart.

tl:dr - New home sizes are falling to account for this spread falling below zero. Adjust for that, and there is nothing to see here.

Short 🧵
2/7

Same chart with prices in the top panel.

It is correct that the new home premium (green) above existing home prices (blue) has collapsed from 38% in 2013 to below zero today (the lowest in 54 years).

Why?

See new home prices (orange), they stalled. Image
3/7

Here is the average home price (orange) and the home's size (blue). The reason prices are falling is that builders are constructing smaller homes.

But as the bottom panel shows (green), the price per square foot is as high as ever.

No bear market, just smaller homes. Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 25, 2025
1/8

Following @deanbaker and @ezraklein ...

Homeowners will not tolerate a "fix" that will lower prices. So, nothing will get done about affordability.
=
What is housing?

* Affordable shelter?
* Piggy bank that funds retirement?

Both cannot be true at the same time.
2/8

For the 50 years following WWII (box), home price gains kept pace with inflation ("real" prices), making housing affordable.

Starting in the late 90s, housing went into wild boom-bust cycles.

This is when housing started to be viewed as a piggy bank to fund retirement. Image
3/8

400 years of real (inflation-adjusted) home prices in Amsterdam show that housing has remained affordable for centuries.

This view began to break down in the late 1990s, as housing became the piggy bank for retirement. Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(