Thread by @TheLastRefuge2

(1) This thread, not written by me - but does have strong merit. A little on the worst case scenario side of things, but well-argued and accepted.

What could be in our future....

(2) "We all know by now “Never let a crisis go to waste” REALLY means:

CREATE a crisis, or the PUBLIC PERCEPTION of a crises, in order to justify a public policy change (Government action) that you want to enact."

(3) And, typically do nothing to truly address the crises you created, as to do so would eliminate the justification for the government action you wanted all along.

(4) Creating this supply chain debacle, as a DIRECT result of Government actions, WILL result in a ‘public outcry”, a DEMAND from consumers, that the Government, the FEDERAL Government specifically, MUST “DO SOMETHING!!”

(5) Just as the initial demands to “DO SOMETHING” resulted in Brandon ordering the ports in Cal. to operate with longer hours, and the container ships to station farther out so they couldn’t be seen, i.e., nothing to truly address the problem,…

(6) The government response to this Government created crises will INEVITABLY be rationing, such as we have not seen since WW2.

(7) [Duration, scope and scale undetermined]

In addition, there will be condemnation and criminal penalties for “Hording”, which WILL have ‘public support’, as the grasshoppers who haven’t “prepped” will be resentful of their ant neighbors, who have.

(8) And, being “Horders” will be another “tag” added to the long list of pejoratives being heaped on US; Racist, Insurrectionist, Anti-vaxxing HORDERS.

(9) In fact, there will be those who will generate the false narrative that the WHOLE problem with supply chains, is BECAUSE of these “horders”; we already saw some of this, in the toilet paper shortage awhile back.

(10) And, of course, once the Government institutes rationing [whatever the scale], IT decides WHERE material goes, AND WHO GETS IT and equally important, WHO DOESN’T.

(11) Current example for reference: "Monoclonal Antibodies"

(12) So, to get your one loaf of bread and gallon of milk per week, you will have to show your vax passport, for you and your household, or “No hamburger for YOU!”, courtesy the “soup kitchen nazi” from seinfeld.

(13) My household are currently ‘insulated’ from the mandates, by luck and lifestyle choices, we have not YET experienced ANY pressure to get the jab.

And, I suspect some millions of those who haven’t been jabbed, are in the same situation.

(14) THIS WOULD put us directly in the crosshairs of coercion and being forced to “comply or die” both by having our stores of food confiscated (and criminally charged with ‘hording’) AND by denying us the opportunity to purchase food, unless we comply.

(15) From the perspective of the Biden government, in alignment with their vaccination ideology as presented via mandates, vaccinations as a qualification for benefit is an opportunity. They will embrace it.

(16) I (and others here) have been pointing out that, once you have “stocked up”, the next equally vital task is to recognize you can ONLY stock up so much, and need to move towards SUSTAINABLE alternatives, i.e. ‘growing your own”.

(17) It is hard to imagine (but ANYTHING IS possible) that in times of food shortages “victory gardens” as were common in WW2 America, will be outlawed....

...At the very least, regulated.

(18) As they have already stated, numerous times, in numerous ways, their strategy and intention are to “make ant-jabbers UNCOMFORTABLE, by degrees, knowing that as they continue to SQUEEZE, many will relent without the “need” to resort to overt police powers for refusing the jab

(19) Hence, I THINK the supply chain disruptions will be made worse by deliberately created policy, in order to justify increased Federal government POWER, in order to push the Covid passport, which is really a “Social credit score” system.

(20) It's a rapid acceleration to totalitarian tyranny, on a Global level, breathtaking to watch, with potentially devastating stakes.

Watch your 6!

/END

(21) All of the above (2 though 20) were not authored by me but do structurally pass the test of actionable insight by accepting things as they are -vs- reconciling the "what ifs" through a prism of what we would wish them to be.