To understand QT, you need to understand QE first.
QE happens when Central Banks create bank reserves out of thin air, and purchase bonds from the private sector with them.
The pvt sector asset composition is forcefully swapped from bonds to inert reserves/deposits.
2/10
The private sector does not have more net worth.
Its asset side's composition has just been swapped: less duration intensive & coupon bearing bonds, more zero duration & low-yielding reserves or deposits.
Now, QT is the exact opposite of this.
But before we go there...
3/10
QE drains collateral (bonds) from the system and adds inert reserves/deposits (allow me to call them ''cash'' here)
It creates a cash/collateral imbalance: a lot of short-term cash-like assets (inert reserves/deposits) chasing less & less collateral
Now, QT!
4/10
There are two ways for the Fed to run QT: let Treasury holdings mature & not reinvest them, or (on top) sell them outright in the market.
The Fed will start with the first option.
But it's already a tough one to digest for markets, and here is why.
5/10
QT reverses the cash/collateral imbalance by draining reserves (reducing Fed balance sheet).
Do you know who's the most important victim here?
The repo market.
The Fed shrank their B/S from $4.5 trn to $3.8 trn in '18-19 and the repo market exploded.
A crucial event.
6/10
The chart below shows short-term repo levels for USTs against Fed Funds rates.
Repos are short-term secured loans collateralized by USTs - in a ''normal'' world, they should be as safe as parking cash at the Fed.
The spread should be close to 0.
It went to 3% in Sep 2019.
7/10
Repos are used by primary dealers and hedge funds to fund their positions. They facilitate leveraged position: as long as repo levels remain tight, with a small amount of capital you can put on large ''relative value'' trades.
If repos explode, it's mayhem unwind time.
8/10
Reversing the cash/collateral imbalance puts pressure on repo levels: less people willing to give away excess ''cash'' in the system = repo levels tend to widen
More punitive repo levels = leverage is more expensive = risk appetite gets marginally hit
It all starts there
9/10
Tapering, QT, hikes: yes, but what's the end game?
I am very excited about tomorrow's article, which will cover exactly that: The Macro End Game.
If you like my macro insights and want to hear my answer, subscribe to TheMacroCompass.substack.com and you'll get it tomorrow!
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Fed goes brrrr, stock market goes up: but the Fed doesn’t print money.
Now, the Fed is not going to hike or do quantitative tightening because they always want to ease: but they are going to tighten.
Oh yes, and even do QT.
Here is why.
1/4
What is their incentive scheme?
Preserve the status quo, kick the can down the road.
The risk/reward of not tightening when the labor market is very tight, inflation is at 7% and policy is ultra accommodative is just…horrible.
Nobody can blame Powell for tightening here.
2/4
& nobody can blame him for trying to reduce excess liquidity - getting away from 0% rates and a $9 trn balance sheet buys the Fed some optionality to fight future downturns
Also, mid-terms are coming and the political pressure to be seen “acting against inflation” is high
3/4
Let's first decompose the move: changes in real yields and changes in inflation expectations.
Real yields are 11 bps higher YTD, hence explaining >90% of the nominal yields move.
Inflation expectations are unchanged.
What does this mean?
2/10
Real yields move higher for 2 main reasons: real growth is repriced higher, or risk premia get built in assets as financial conditions are unduly tightening (e.g. policy mistakes, major liquidity distress, credit crunches)
Today, it's a cyclical real growth re-rating story
The chart below shows the US Wilshire 5000 total return index (incl. reinvestments of dividends) against gold, both rebased at 100 starting 40 years ago.
The stock market has obviously outperformed gold over the last 40 years, and it's likely to do so in the future.
Why?
1/4
Stock market total returns are mostly driven by dividend yields, earnings growth and changes in valuations.
The distribution of dividend yields and earnings growth are skewed to deliver positive returns on average (dividend yields are positive, and earnings tend to grow).
2/4
Changes in valuations can be very volatile, but the real return on risk-free rates alternatives (bond real yields) tend to influence BOTH valuations in stocks and gold prices.
Basically, gold gets a tailwind from lower real yields.
Stocks too, but also from DY + EPS growth!
3/4
The prevailing narrative regarding the pandemic seems to be that Omicron will turn it into a harmless endemic straight away in 2022
Peer-reviewed pieces in The Lancet and Nature partially confirm this thesis, but on a big picture basis we are heading in the right direction
1/5
The Lancet piece shows how effective antibodies to C-19 have a median life of around 165 days - that means the median person infected with Omicron today should get ''natural immunity'' until summer.
Sometimes, antibodies can last much longer though.
2/5
Research continues, luckily
C-19 pills (e.g. Pfizer or Merck) are being approved, and they seem to be able to reduce severe symptoms by 90% or so - that's great
The not-so-good news is that large scale production will only happen in 2023, so benefits for 2022 are limited
3/5
While US mid-term elections draw quite a lot of attention, market commentators often overlook one of the most relevant political events: the Chinese Politburo meeting.
In Oct/Nov 2022, the CCP Politburo will hold its 20th National Party Congress.
A short thread.
1/6
To Xi or not to Xi?
Chinese officials are generally asked to retire when they reach 65-68y of age - this rule is often applied for some but not for others, and for sure Xi will not be upheld by this.
But there are other relevant CCP members who could be influenced.
2/6
Assuming we get another 5y of Xi, how will he handle the inevitable real GDP per capita slowdown China is and will be facing?
Even if you are China, you can't fight demographics: labor supply growth will turn negative (!) in this decade and real GDP growth converge to 3%