Let's pretend for a moment that the magical candy-floss version of NFTs, where you can just buy a gun in Call of Duty and use it in Fortnite, actually works. Just by magic, let's pretend it's not hilariously impossible. These magic tokens just transfer assets between games.
These magic tokens that make the same gun work in Fortnite, Warzone, Valorant, and Halo are, crucially, running on a decentralized blockchain.
Decentralized also means unregulated.
So, how long do you figure it takes before the first invincibility code NFT hits the market? You can just transfer your invincibility into Fortnite, Valorant, League of Legends, whatever game you want! Doesn't that sound fun?
How long? I would guess less than ten minutes.
Not even the best-case magical hallucinogen-fueled make-believe fantasy version of this technology is a good idea.
(Anyone who was around for the implementation of Steam achievements, and the subsequent immediate birth of "Achievement Games" where you just press a button and it gives you 400 free achievements, is nodding exhaustedly right now.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is really difficult for the average person to fully conceive of how useless NFTs are. We're primed for reason. If people are making so much noise about this technology-- if it IS technology, at all-- then surely it does SOMETHING... right?
(The answer is, no. It does absolutely nothing.)
It records a crytocurrency transaction and appends arbitrary data to the transaction. That's it.
The general agreement is that this transaction confers ownership of whatever data is appended to the record, but there is no mechanism for enforcing that ownership...
1) Copyright law is a nightmare, largely thanks to Disney. 2) Publishers suck for various reasons but are necessary for the survival of many authors & much of the publishing industry. 3) Authors always get the shit end of the stick when things go wrong & often when they go right.
4) Libraries have many problems (often due to 1 & 2) but when people use libraries, authors are ultimately compensated and do benefit, often significantly. Libraries are good. 5) The Internet Archive is good and its archival services are important and necessary.
6) When the IA put a metric fuckton of books online for free, it did not do so the way a library does. It did it the way the Pirate Bay does. Authors did not benefit at all. Nor were they consulted in advance.