At my newsletter BIG @samhaselby went into the historical roots of the cartel behavior of the Ivy League network. But yeah they also engage in straight-up price-fixing, which we've known for decades. mattstoller.substack.com/p/break-up-the…
This is a fun complaint on the Ivy's. "In addition, such Defendants are committed to maintaining admissions as a zero- sum game, by limiting growth in the number of undergraduate seats to maximize perceptions of exclusivity and prestige." @profgalloway
"At Dartmouth, development officers meet with admissions staff to review a list created by the development office. Each year, up to 50 applicants may be considered through this special process, most of whom are admitted, accounting for 4-5% of Dartmouth’s student body."
This is gross and much worse than the Varsity Blues college admissions scandal. Here's the CEO of Sony offering $1M to an Ivy to accept his daughter. Billionaire Leon Black tried to get the money for Dartmouth, but she went to Brown instead. And so did the one million dollars.
Georgetown Dean of admissions: “On the fundraising side, we also have a small number of ‘development potential’ candidates. If Bill Gates wants his kid to come to Georgetown, we’d be more than happy to have him come and talk to us.” And that's not the worst quote...
"...not all those special cases end up being people who give a lot of money. We have children of Supreme Court justices, senators, and so on apply. We may give extra consideration to them because of the opportunities that may bring.”😳
"In targeting Class Members through the institution’s alumni magazine, for example, Dartmouth claimed in 2015 that rising tuition prices could be explained because “[j]ust as lattes cost more these days, so do markers and whiteboards and keeping the lights on."
"Competition in the Market for Elite, Private Universities is constrained by extremely strong brand preferences and high barriers to entry. Such institutions limit the supply of available seats, which has the effect of generating scarcity and enhancing their prestige."
A cartel of universities seeking to accept the children of the wealthy and powerful "does not have any pro-competitive impacts."
Also it excludes judges from the class of harmed parties.
😂😂😂
This complaint is a troll of elite America.
The gist is that Ivy league schools were given an exemption by Congress to collude on prices as long as they all agreed to be 'need-blind' in admission, meaning you get a scholarship if you need it. Accepting the wealthy and powerful meant they were not need-blind.
None of this is a surprise, of course. Everyone knows that elite universities treat the wealthy and powerful differently. It's just that lying about it in collusion with other elite liars opens them up to legal liability.
If oil went up to $400 a barrel and it often wasn't available, no one would wonder about the cause of inflation. But since the input at hand is semiconductors and there's not really much public pricing info, it's not in the inflation models.
Firm behavior and bottlenecks affect prices. The outsourcing of large amounts of production by auto firms impacted inflation. Auto availability was a big part of the initial inflationary spike. nytimes.com/2022/01/08/bus…
No one will believe me when I say this but the Biden administration has almost no one in positions of power who know how to govern. We haven't governed in 30 years so there's just no knowledge. Example is Pete Buttigieg - he doesn't know anything.
Imagine if we hadn't made movies in 30 years. And then one day someone said 'ok we want to build a movie-making town called Hollywood go staff it up and made a slate of great films in a year.' That's our political order. No one knows how to pull the levers to do things.
Susan Rice knows very little about domestic policy and was put at the head of the White House Domestic Policy Council as a favor to Obama. It's classic incompetence.
While personally I think student debt cancellation is a good idea, it's ok if the Biden White House goes in a different direction. But they have to do something somewhere about some problem. There's no one doing anything about anything.
If concentration is systemic, then taking on monopolists is an inflation-fighting strategy. 60% of inflation increases are going to corporate profits. mattstoller.substack.com/p/corporate-pr…
Meat is an obvious case. Back in October I pointed out that the economists blocking action on meatpacking consolidation had manipulated data to protect monopolists. Higher beef prices are one result. mattstoller.substack.com/p/economists-t…
I think my response to @JosephPolitano is that his analysis is divorced from the underlying reality of commerce. Like most macro-economists, he assumes that individual markets are generally competitive, and that concentration is not the norm.
Take this argument on how meatpacking monopolists don't really matter because meat is a small portion of the CPI. This only makes sense if you assume that meatpacking is an outlier. But is it? No.
Rather amusing to see a debate over price controls as if we have a functional government who could implement them in time to do anything about inflation. Adorable!
People who cite John Kenneth Galbraith as controlling inflation often neglect to point out that there was a large competent bureaucracy and public support to implement them. What are we gonna do today? Hire McKinsey?
The anti-monopoly movement spent years studying how to organize the bureaucracies and it’s still really hard to turn the ship around. The idea you can snap your fingers and return to a WWII model of economic organization should be embarrassing to its proponents.