They want 3 and 4 year olds to "question social, scientific, and historical facts." Under a section about keeping kids safe, it shrugs that trying to "control" a class is "white supremacist thought"
The real significance of this story is it shows how easily Republican politicians are outmaneuvered by the staff and activists that burrow into the administrative state and do the actual work--especially when they are lazy. North Carolina has a Republican state superintendent.
A Republican board member passively tries to complain about the preschool CRT, but is easily manipulated by staff. The superintendent also defers to staff, and doesn't have have an understanding of the actual facts enough to challenge their vague excuses.
This shows how completely hopeless the situation is if we just have Republican pols that say 'I oppose CRT' but aren't willing to plunge into the details, aggressively ask follow-up questions, and understand the word games CRT types use, as illuminated by @conceptualjames et al
At one point a conservative school board member goes (paraphrasing) well I want to do equity, not critical race theory. She doesn't understand that equity IS the word K-12 uses for CRT.
It's really sad to watch the video of the school board meeting. The staff hems and haws with ridiculous, vague excuses until the Republicans are confused and just accept it ("they're staff, they know more than us part-time pols") or give up.
Staff basically says "well the training where we force 3-year olds to be communists has nothing to do with this, because that training was done under a different grant'
But the grant they're voting on would pay the same people to create more content on the same topic
The saddest part is when the superintendent, who was elected as a Republican and tells political groups she opposes CRT, says this as if it's exculpatory:
"When we talk about equity and culturally responsive training, it is specific to preschool children with disabilities.”
OH! I guess parents are just too stupid to comprehend, then, that's it. They're complaining about a DIFFERENT program where you indoctrinate 3yo, but it's OK because THIS is paying the SAME people to do it to HANDICAPPED ones.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Numerous high schools are directing students to email their names, physical and email addresses, and phone numbers to an alleged “serial sexual predator who convinces unwitting young women into sending nude images" -- even after I alerted them of it.
Philip Sobash is a disgraced doctor who was referred to the FBI and lost his medical license after being sued 3x by young women--mostly aspiring medical professionals--who said he struck up online relationships with them, convinced them to send nudes, then ruined their lives.
Now, he has created a "scholarship" for high school students who want to be "future medical doctors," along with "mentorship" program where he will "give his best to groom" them. The deadline to apply is tomorrow! All HS seniors have to do is get in touch with him directly.
What happened to all those unaccompanied minors under a bridge? No one knows and the statistics are massively wrong.
DOJ has a "juvenile file" purporting to show all underage illegal border-crossers, but comparing it to a court docket that hears similar cases, 90% are missing.
Some names on the juvenile list, meanwhile, are actually listed as being over 18. DOJ indicated that it doesn't use outside sources to verify age, and didn't explain the discrepancy.
Supt. Scott Ziegler notoriously said there had been zero bathroom assaults
He then apologized for his "misleading" statement by saying he thought the question referred *only to transgender and gender-fluid students*.
But if this isn't gender-fluid, then what is?
He didn't say, 'oh, there was one kid that was wearing all-girls clothes 20 days ago, but his mom says he identifies as male.' He smugly lectured parents, citing Time Magazine to say that what they were concerned about "doesn't exist."
The teachers union that claims there's a "school to prison pipeline" and wants to dismantle discipline in schools wants to flush away the life of a teenager who a jury of his peers conclusively determined was guilty of no crime.
Reminder: Rittenhouse was a child like the 60 million others in the public school system, and the top teacher in the country wanted him to send him to prison even after a jury painstakingly reviewed all evidence and concluded he committed no crime.
BIG: Terry McAuliffe's former law firm and the National School Boards Association are pushing (through a case they want to take to the Supreme Court) for an interpretation of Title IX that is less favorable to victims and more favorable to administrators
Loudoun County blamed Title IX for its rape coverup, saying it would lobby Washington to make the law more favorable to victims. But Terry McAuliffe's former law firm and the NSBA (which likened parents to domestic terrorists) are actually pushing for the opposite.
On one side is the NSBA, Fairfax County Public Schools, and its attorney Hunton Andrews (where McAuliffe worked until his campaign).
On the other side is a public interest law firm and 23 women's and civil rights groups.
Hunton lost, but wants to take it to the Supreme Court.
NEW ON LOUDOUN: Over a period of years, Loudoun repeatedly failed to disclose sex assault incidents to the state and public despite law. A state database shows "0" during multiple time periods where highly-public incidents happened.
NEW ON LOUDOUN: Three weeks after bathroom rape, the superintendent claimed "to my knowledge, we don’t have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms" -- but state law requires principals to report all sex assaults to the superintendent.