"Giving parents too much information, is not a good idea. They do not need the specifics."
Bear in mind, this exchange is about parents who had specifically requested a reading assessment score (DIBELS score) for their kids. So concerns about parents not having enough info...+
... to understand DIBELS ring hollow.
Sure, many parents don't know tons about each reading assessment. Shouldn't the school then... explain the assessment?
@lisamandaglio suggests giving a guide to the results, and explaining what action the school is taking.
I'm Team Lisa.
.@WPSedu Assistant Superintendent Jennifer Elineema has a troubling answer.
She's way too chill about the kids whose reading skills are below the grade level benchmark.
There's nothing "developmentally appropriate" about it.
None of this is the least bit surprising.
The dominant attitude about kids reading skills is the oft-repeated reassurance to parents, "Don't worry, kids catch up."
"It's developmentally appropriate to be below grade level" = same same.
The reality: most kids don't catch up.
But here's the most striking part of all, and it's the norm for most schools:
They have assessment data on which kids are reading below grade level.
But they are only going to give it to parents who ask for it.
That's so clear.
Look at NYC. They have DIBELS data on every K–2 child this year.
Have you heard about any parent receiving this info?
When have data on which kids are below grade level norms, that info is not communicated to parents.
And that's seen as totally cool. In part due to the attitudes in this thread.
All of this, BTW, is why literacy advocates seek universal screening laws.
Here's an example:
In California, advocates are working to see a reading skills screening bill, #SB237, passed into law. It's encountering resistance... from teachers unions.
For those who don’t know, they have been working to get the flawed @TeachersCollege Reading Workshop curriculum / balanced literacy out of their schools.
I have to wonder, reading the latest @BurbioCalendar update.
It’s a reminder of how out-of-touch the schools conversation has been:
96% of schools were open last week, even accounting for staffing-induced closures.
So allllll that hand-wringing about whether or not they should stay open… which implied that most districts were even having this debate… feels like the latest round of Twitter Is Not Real Life, coastal elite hand-wringing.
Most districts just stayed open and got it done.
On point: this week, planned closures affect less than 1% of schools.
There will be unplanned/forced closures for staffing, but this is still a good indication that preemptive closures are an edge case.
We need to avoid normalizing something that isn’t a norm.
I think a lot of physicians themselves are anxious. And themselves are trying to offset their own anxiety by broadcasting to a wider public the anxiety that’s in the air.”