IMO, AB Health is falsely inflating age 5-11 stats, using 2 separate gambits:
1. Mixing kids who got regular, adult dose for turning 12 in 2021 into current age 5-11 getting paediatric doses now. 2. Poaching doses from age "Unknown".
So let's look at these 2 footnotes and process them.
"Note 1: individuals who received a first dose in one age category may cross into another age category for a second or third dose."
That makes sense.
eg. Someone who got 1st Dose at age 44, and 2nd Dose at age 45, moves UP into older age group.
Same regular, adult dose too.
"Note 2: The age group 5-11 year olds includes those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty pediatric COVID-19 vaccine and those who were eligible to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine because they were 11 but would turn 12 in 2021."
Say WHAT now?
Note 2 says:
• Kids who are all 12 now
• who got REGULAR, ADULT doses throughout 2021 because they would turn 12 in 2021
• are being pulled back DOWN into age 5-11
• to mix their numbers with kids getting PAEDIATRIC doses since 25 Nov 2021.
ie. Opposite to Note 1.
WHY?
Referring to my thread 2 wks ago, if this:
• pulling kids age 12 who got regular adult doses
• into the stats for age 5-11 getting paediatric doses
• OPPOSITE to natural shift in all ages
• is the right thing to do...
Why did AB Health wait until the 20 Dec stats to do it?
AB Health needs to disclose exactly how many kids:
• are still age 5-11
• got paediatric doses
• in their regular daily updates
• and how many kids who turned 12 in 2011 - who got regular, adult doses - that they juiced into age 5-11
• and move those kids back to age 12-14
Poaching doses from age "Unknown".
I did say at the beginning of today's thread that there were two (2) gambits.
• age 12, already shown.
I had to do a lot of thinking last week, and too much time with spreadsheets, to show the second gambit.
Between 19 and 20 Dec 2021's stats, AB Health:
• quietly moved 18,621 doses from age "Unknown" to age 5-11
• while total 1st Doses had only gone up 4,578 doses
This looks more like intentional deception than mere incompetence. At the least, negligence.
Let's zoom out a bit in my spreadsheet, built exclusively from AB Health's own stats.
• age 5-11 stats started Fri 25 Nov, with stats from opening weekend ending Sun 28 Nov on the Monday after
• 6,139 doses per day on opening weekend
• then 4,248 doses/day until 19 Dec.
OK.
From Mon 20 Dec 2021, to latest stats provided Friday, up to Thu 6 Jan 2022:
Daily pace of vaccination continued to fall since opening weekend 6,139 doses/day to only 1,129.
Not enough to pretend this age group was vaccinated enough to return to school in January.
As I showed in my previous thread, in total, between 19 and 20 Dec, AB Health:
• moved 31,531 doses (Dose 1, 2 & 3) from "Unknown"
• while age 5-11 went up by 34,935
• in one day
• even though Total Doses across ALL age groups for ALL Doses (mostly 3rd) went up by 35,825.
This juicing of age 5-11 stats from age "Unknown" even pumped up the 2nd Doses:
•" Unknown" down 12,899
• age 5-11 up 12,985
• but Total 2nd Doses across all ages only up 2,099
Age 5-11 only got 107,626 1st doses since 25 Nov.
Yet on 20 Dec they got 12,985 2nd doses?!
🐴💩
But wait - it gets even more ridiculous:
3rd Doses. Boosters!
• To age 5-11
• On 20 December 2021
• Even though only age 18+ is eligible, after 5+ months
• Or age 12 under specific immunocompromised conditions
In my opinion, based on bona fide belief from information that AB Health & Education have provided, it appears:
• AB Health is deceiving Albertans about low child vaccination levels
• to get parents to send those kids to school anyway.
Nationally, age 5-11 has 1st dose coverage of 45.63%.
Even with falsely inflated stats, Alberta is showing 38%.
Nationally, age 5-11 has 2nd dose coverage of 2.03%.
Because of falsely inflated stats, Alberta is showing 4.1%
🧵I live dangerously. Last night I was on the Red Line headed north from Somerset, shortly after the après-Flames crowd had thinned.
I threw on my respirator as I boarded (measles is transmitted by aerosol, as are COVID and influenza and RSV, etc)
You know where this goes…
A fellow train rider already seated 1 m away to my left took issue with it, even though (I swear) I did not offer him a respirator to wear.
So, even if I were to believe Droplet nonsense, we were within each other’s 2 m ABSOLUTELY SAFE SOCIAL DISTANCING MINIMUM.
Chatty fellow.
He asked me if I was aware “that f-ing thing did nothing for me.”
As I had not reviewed the gentleman’s curriculum vitae before our impromptu debate, I chose to nod, in submission to his likely superior IPAC gravitas.
🧵Respected Alberta political scientist @DuaneBratt posted in the friendlier place this same-day review of Health Min LaGrange's Statement of Defence in wrongful termination lawsuit from fired AHS CEO Athana Mentzelopoulos.
@DuaneBratt AB Justice Minister posted a link to the Statement of Defence from the Dropbox of a Heather Jenkins, who appears to be the Ministry's Press Secretary.
@DuaneBratt GoA is again using external counsel rather than (excellent) in-house lawyers, just as they did in CM v Alberta in 2022, when LaGrange was Minister of Education.
Taxpayers paid for their representation + Justice Dunlop's penalty to pay Plaintiff's Costs.
I've tagged my MLA Kathleen Ganley on this, as she is a lawyer and former Justice Minister. I am neither, so I would appreciate her review of this, with advisors at @albertaNDP as required.
It is baffling to me, but as a layperson I looked deeper...
You're apparently renovating the bathroom above my friend's high-rise condo suite in NW Calgary, and here's what you (?) have done to her ceiling. Your "installer" apparently ran down to say he would "clean it up".
Sunday Brunch Buffet at @HyattCalgary with my sister for her birthday tomorrow. All this chef-prepared food, on heavy plates and silverware, and graceful perfect service for $45.
Don’t tell her I could probably afford this more than once/year.
@AdrianaLaGrange @ABDanielleSmith @JMeddings @alanna_smithh @TheBreakdownAB @JenLeeCBC @PfParks @LukaszukAB @reportrix @CheSkulskiCTV @ByMatthewBlack @DuaneBratt We know 120 mg/5 mL is European concentration, and 160 mg/5 mL is N American.
Yet you paid MHCare Medical $70m for 5m bottles (10-14x Canada's annual demand) of European concentration, when Atabay would have happily mixed the Canadian concentration in this custom order for us.
@AdrianaLaGrange @ABDanielleSmith @JMeddings @alanna_smithh @TheBreakdownAB @JenLeeCBC @PfParks @LukaszukAB @reportrix @CheSkulskiCTV @ByMatthewBlack @DuaneBratt This "risk was identified" AFTER this thick suspension clogged the tiny diameter gastric feeding tubes of infants in Neonatal ICU, not "children under two years of age".
Evasive minimizers!
And you still defended this off-label use afterwards.