Novak Djoković claims to have been tested positiv for Covid on the 16th of December.
However the timestamp for the digital version of his positiv test indicates the result may actually be from the 26th of December.
Our reporting @derspiegel in german spiegel.de/sport/tennis/u…
However the timestamp for the digital version of his positiv test indicates the result may actually be from the 26th of December.
Our reporting @derspiegel in german spiegel.de/sport/tennis/u…
@derspiegel The Unix timestamp in his positive test: Dec 26th, 14:21:20 (serbian time)
However the serbian health documents put forward by Djokovics lawyer claim the test to be from the 16th.
Docs can be found here: fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/…
However the serbian health documents put forward by Djokovics lawyer claim the test to be from the 16th.
Docs can be found here: fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/…
The Unix timestamp in a negative test: Dec 22nd, 16:43:12 (serbian time)
This alligns with the date on the documents from the serbian testing system, which claim this test to be from the 22nd. This second (or first?) test seems to be put forward as proove Djokovic recovered.
This alligns with the date on the documents from the serbian testing system, which claim this test to be from the 22nd. This second (or first?) test seems to be put forward as proove Djokovic recovered.
Another anomality:
The testing ID for Djokovics positive test result, alledgedly from Dec 16th is higher than the testing ID for his negative test result.
This indicates the positive test was added to the database days after the negative one.
The testing ID for Djokovics positive test result, alledgedly from Dec 16th is higher than the testing ID for his negative test result.
This indicates the positive test was added to the database days after the negative one.
The expertes from @zerforschung could confirm that these IDs are assigned consecutively. There thread about the case is here (in german)
https://twitter.com/zerforschung/status/1480919124117274625
@zerforschung who have investigated many testing systems and found flaws in them, conclude: "Based on these pieces of evidence the most plausible explanation is that the positive test result was added to the official serbian database on the 26th of december and not on the 16th."
@zerforschung All of this raises many questions about how these test results came to be, not only from Djokovic but also from Serbian authorities. Unfurtunatly non of the agencies involved have replied to our questions yet.
Full story spiegel.de/sport/tennis/u…
https://twitter.com/m_hoppenstedt/status/1480922969295761408
Full story spiegel.de/sport/tennis/u…
On top of this, there is still the mystery why the positiv test result, alledgedly from dec 16th, was actually presented as negative for around an hour yesterday as found by @meynj when scanned.
Also published and explaiend here by @BenRothenberg
Also published and explaiend here by @BenRothenberg
https://twitter.com/BenRothenberg/status/1480449881936306178
Here, the experts from @zerforschung go through all the technical details of their findings:
https://twitter.com/zerforschung/status/1480924205352996870
Reporting with @meynj , full story here in german (€) spiegel.de/sport/tennis/u…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
