Facilitator Heather Bergman is here, which is always delightful. Everyone loves Heather.
I aspire to be the kind of person who brings joy just by showing up. I doubt that will happen so long as I'm a journalist in Boulder, but a girl can dream...
First: A few announcements.
- Get vaccinated
- Sign up for health care (open enrollment lasts through Jan. 15)
- Apply for a city board/commission (thru Feb. 21)
Bergman taking over. We're gonna look at what work is already in progress, including leftovers from *last* council, and then the capacity and priorities for each dept, and all the priorities from CC members.
It's very plan-y and kinda hard to tweet, but also important bc... this is what council/staff will be doing for the next 2 yrs.
It's not "official" until next week's retreat (Jan. 21-22) so, again, no need to follow along if you, you know, have a life.
Oh, you know what else we're talking about? Board/commission feedback. It was dif this year — just one or two suggested priorities for each board.
Past years have been... intense.
We've started with feedback from Boulder's cultural brokers (actually called community connectors).
Lots of concerns about housing and income, particularly high-interest loans in mobile home parks; health care access; access to the gov't and resources.
Particularly during COVID — lots of concern over lack of access to vax, tests.
Community connectors serve as kind of a link to the city gov't and traditionally under-represented groups. They had pages and pages of notes — so many needs, as you would expect when this many systems are THIS broken.
"It is clear that the city has a lot of possibilities," says Adriana Paolo, through an interpreter, "but there are a lot of needs."
"Together we can build more dignified communities," Paola finishes. (Correct spelling there; misspelled it in the last tweet. My apologies.)
Joseph asks for a clarification on one of Paola's comments: That POC feel left out of services like childcare.
Paola clarifies: Sometimes, for community meetings, etc. there is childcare provided. But POC don't feel welcomed. They feel discriminated against; they don't want to bring their kids there.
Services weren't specified.
What's the process for that if someone feels discriminated against at a business? Joseph asks
NRV: Some cities have offices of human rights with an official process. Boulder doesn't. That's something to think about in the future.
I *do* think there is a system for complaints... I vaguely recall something from the Human Relations Commission, but it's been years since that conversation / story happened.
Anyone know what I'm talking about?
Ah, yes, here: The city has human rights ordinance that bans discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodation. There's a complaint form on this site. bouldercolorado.gov/services/human…
Moving on: 2022 workplan
Of Council's 14 priorities for last term, 11 were completed; 3 are ongoing. That's a 79% completion rate; 21% carrying over to the next term
MUCH better than the council before that. (I don't have exact numbers for you to definitively say that, but I *know* they did not get that many of their priorities completed.)
NRV reminding council that there is so much city work that goes on; what council wants represents just a sliver of everything that staff does.
"Every department is feeling the strain of lack of staff capacity," NRV says.
True. The feedback from EVERY dept included the difficulty of recruiting and retaining employees.
That's not unique to Boulder, of course, or even municipal gov't. Longmont and Lafayette are also seeing higher turnover than usual. As is, like, the whole U.S.
Not sure exactly how/what to share with you. So much data!
But the bottom line is: Whatever this council WANTS to do, there may be very little staff can actually handle.
"As we hire more people, and our able to expand our currently constrained capacity," we'll be able to complete existing work and do some new stuff, NRV says. So it's bad, but it won't stay that way.
Maybe we'll start with a check-in on ongoing work? (And when things are coming back to council next year)
There are 2022 work 38 items, 16 of which are continuing from the last council's priorities.
(* = leftover)
*Encampment removals
- Q2 update to council, Q3 budgeting
Obviously the city doesn't refer to this as encampment removals, but that's what they are. This is separate from homeless services, its own workplan item.
*Police master plan; 40% complete
- Q1 update to council, Q4 public hearing, adoption
Advanced Life Support services; 25% complete
- Q3 recommendations to/from council
*COVID
- Monthly updates
Joint CU / Boulder police training academy
- Progress and update TBD
Building home program (supports for unhoused ppl who have been housed, to increase retention)
- Q1 update (ARPA funding), Q2 study session (annual homelessness update)
*Factory to build manufactured housing; 30% complete (partnership with Habitat, BVSD)*
- Q1 update
*CIRT (mental health co-response with police) - evaluation for potential expansion; 0% complete
- Q2 funding request of council
Parks & Rec master plan; 75% complete
- Q2 public hearing, adoption
And lastly... Outdoor dining pilot (3 yrs post-pandemic); 50% complete
- Q1 update
- Q2 budget consideration
Dang, that was a lot. I'm sorry; I should have sifted through that and broken it out by topic (like housing, homelesness, climate, transportation, budget, etc.)
Just finished *taking* those notes during this meeting. Will organize them better for a story.
The city broken them down into seven "values" categories (which is less than helpful for you, or me)
- Liveable
- Safe
- Economically vital
- Accessible & connected
- Environmentally sustainable
- Responsibly governed
- Healthy and socially thriving
Friend q: We're listing CU South and racial equity as complete, but I don't think they are. They're continuing, right?
NRV: Yes, they're ongoing, but council had particular action priorities, like adopting a racial equity plan and passing the CU South annexation.
Both those larger work items continue, tho.
Benjamin: The completion % aren't that helpful, bc even if we're 90% complete, will that last 10% take 2 months or 2 years? Maybe we should have expected completion dates.
I also could dump a crap load of feedback from individual departments — what they're working on and what they have capacity for — but I won't
What you *do* need to know is that ~a half dozen dept have NO or extremely little capacity for anything new, including Housing and Human Services, Planning, Transportation, Police, Library, HR and the city court.
Yates: Council's 2022 priorities don't include things that we know are ongoing. We're only suggesting NEW work items.
Brockett: Are there any things the planning dept is already working on to allow more housing, other than that one item about zoning code changes? (Which staff hasn't started and has no capacity for)
David Gehr, who has returned as interim planning director: Use tables, of course. And we'll make a list for the retreat. "Planners always have a list" of things they'd like "to make more efficient regulation."
V happy to have the extremely nice and knowledgeable Gehr back. But also v sad bc Boulder needs to let this man live his life!!!
Speer: Something I'm thinking about as we look at this list is where the $$ is going to come from. How much are we getting / do we have left from ARPA funds?
NRV: We've allocated $4M, so we have $16M left. We're coming back to you in February with more info.
NRV: And there might be more $$ coming down from the feds, via the infrastructure bill or other grants.
Feb. 8, specifically, is when that update is scheduled
And the later-year update will be in July
Wallach: "As a member of council in 2021, I knew we had done quite a bit. But it wasn't really until I read the staff memo that I got the full flavor of what had been achieved during COVID. I think it was a remarkable performance under the most difficult circumstances imagineable
*Imaginable
"I'd like to congratulate staff for all they did," Wallach says. "This is remarkable."
NRV: "Staff has done so much. But they're tired. And they're overworked." Her priority for 2022 is hiring more people! (And keeping the ones they have.)
Forgot that one of the things I love about Bergman is that she lets us take breaks.
See you back at 7:30, where we'll discover what each council member's priorities for 2022 are.
Next thread: Council members' individual priorities. I *think* they were limited to 5 each...? But I may be wrong on that.
Bergman has grouped these into topics. Looks like the biggest one is Housing, followed by Homelessness, then Transportation, Elections and Planning stuff.
Mayor Brockett is kicking us off. His priorities (he picked ones that others might be less likely to suggest):
- Mental health / EMT first responder program. Current program, CRIT, co-responds with police. But most cities don't have mental health profs go with the cops.
Next up: Speer has requested a check-in on emergency shelter for the unhoused, as Boulder Shelter has hit capacity this winter.
The Shelter added 5 more beds in response.
The fire has exacerbated things, bc the Shelter relies on hotel beds for overflow and.... hotels are full. They can't do extra hotel rooms during "critical" weather (6+ inches of snow or below 10 degrees), per email from Firnhaber today.
"We have been talking about this even before the fires, bc COVID was creating real challenges for us," Firnhaber says. (Hotel rooms are also used for COVID-vulnerable populations)
OK, Boulder is bringing back its assault weapons ban and limits on high-capacity mags which was first passed in May 2018.
In March 2021, it was blocked by a CO court. 10 days later: the King Soopers shooting
After that, State legislature repealed state preemption on local gun control. So Boulder is bringing it back on Feb. 1
Bringing them* back, since it's really two laws. And maybe some extra things. Things like
- open carry
- waiting period for gun purchases
- firearms-free areas
I didn't take notes, but the presentation says this is the 12th-oldest building still standing in Boulder.
Kelly Molinet, with September School, says the current owner has not taken care of the property. They are trading on the school's good name for this project, which she doesn't have a problem with. But...
"I do have a problem with the character and behavior of the current owner."
One potential item for call-up (though I doubt council will review it).
It's 1820 15th Street / 1603 Walnut
Grace Commons Church, formerly First Presbyterian
3-story addition (43,854 sq ft) to main church
Includes rec space, meeting rooms, church offices
AND a 4-story mixed use building with ground-floor cafe, assembly space plus 30 permanently affordable homes
Here's a whole presentation about it, if you want to learn more.
Friend: Can we use the 30th Street facility for extra sheltering? (Where winter sheltering was for 2 yrs before it all got folded into Boulder Shelter)
Firnhaber: That site is being developed for affordable housing, and the building has tenants.
Gonna have more convo on shelter later on. Lots of requests during open comment for more shelter, as Boulder's has been hitting capacity and turning people away.
Apologies I did not tweet; my heart and brain can only handle so much at the moment.