1/ @daveweigel is a great reporter, and no piece for a national audience can summarize a 2+ multifront debate but from where I sit, couple of things this misses washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
2/ First, I think it's a mistake to look at the SFUSD recall as mostly/just a progressive vs moderate debate. There are a lot of very left people who've had it with the school board.
3/ Nor are people who are pro SFUSD recall necessarily aligned with the Boudin recall. Some are, some aren't. Lots of people passionately care about one and don't really care about the other.
4/ the school board frustration is, in part/for some, linked to a larger frustration with SF politicians prioritizing performativeness over actual performance.
Letting perfect be the enemy of the good.
5/ This piece gave a lot of air time to Collins, who is eager to position her recall as a gift to national Republicans, which...no.
6/ SFUSD's budget gap is alluded to but not how the board, after refusing to address the shortfall only finally staved off a state takeover.
7/ Nor was how SFUSD has been woefully unprepared—and board often not willing TO prepare—for each predictable inflection point of the pandemic. Yet again now: missionlocal.org/2022/01/san-fr…
8/ Renaming schools controversy isn't even just that it took attention from pandemic planning, though yes, that. It's the pathetically slip-shod process that made a mockery of actual scholarship. Performativeness over real performance. theguardian.com/us-news/2021/a…
10/ Through all of this SF BOE has also just run meetings incredibly badly, and sometimes very non transparently, which seems like a small thing but dumps gasoline onto the fire re public opinion of it on each of these fronts.
11/ Anyway if Lopez, Collins, Moliga (or 2 of 3) get recalled it will have some echos of and feed into national debates, but there's just a lot of very very very SF wrinkles to this story, many more than this thread even alludes to.
12/ Finally there's probably no way to properly express how Collins suing the school board for $87m—amid a gigantic budget shortfall and a year+ school closures—poisoned the well against her and Lopez. sfchronicle.com/bayarea/articl…
1/ It's a mistake to think that kids' mental health problems are just because of school closures as opposed to pandemic trauma broadly, plus climate change, school shootings, and all the ways adults are fucking their future.
just as...
2/...it's a mistake to think that teachers are concerned only with their own health. Or that the POC parents who were among the most reluctant to send kids back before vaccines were available/pandemic ebbed aren't making nuanced risk assessments of relative risks to their kids.
3/ You don't have to have kids to recognize that these tradeoffs aren't easily reduced, you only need to listen to a wide variety of parents, kids, and educators.
Lot of liberal pundit handwringing to the effect of "we can close schools now that we know of the great harms to kid's mental health"
which, yes, but...
(CTU maybe aside) is anyone pushing closures that aren't solely prompted by staff shortages due to their own infections?
Like pundits seem to be fighting the last war. Excepting SFUSD, they've been mostly back for a year. And even SFUSD isn't headed toward indefinite closures.
But if 30% of a school's staff is out sick/isolating, then yeah, duh, there are going to be some closed schools or classes.
NPR spent more time this morning dancing around the fact that his language was "more vulgar" than they would repeat/Anglicize than what (if anything) he was trying to signal re strategy.
"make life really shitty for if they won't get vaccinated" is pretty different than just "shit upon."
This is a thought-provoking piece on the racial implications of what the Jan 6 rioters are being charged with, or not, by @aeconwright. And a fascinating history lesson to boot: motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Did you know that Francis Scott Key—yes that one—charged an abolitionist with sedition in an extremely high-profile trial in which a mob tried to lynch the abolitionist only to turn their wrath on the free Black people of DC instead? motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Did you know that, after the FBI charged a coalition of white supremacists with conspiring to assassinate civil rights leaders, rob banks, and create a free white state the jury acquitted them? motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
The shit-show on 1-95 is further evidence that people have to swap weather/disaster tips with those in other regions. For example, in the Upper Midwest, most would be prepared for blizzard road conditions with boots/blankets/fire starting stuff/food/water in trunk.
Now, as a DC/NOVA native does it seem insane that folks there would need to know like...how to drive on black ice? I guess. They can't even drive in the rain! But extreme weather is the norm and we need to swap expertise accordingly.
When I lived in MN, not only did we drive around with chains, and xtra boots/gloves, and blankets, and jumper cables, and ice scrappers, and even boards and sand, but you always had a tin can, some newspaper, and some matches, in case you needed to start a fire to survive.
Totally curious how the jury could find that she broke the law by defrauding (some) investors as to the claims of devices but not the patients who had life-altering misdiagnoses.