Headline CPI was 0.5% for December, core was 0.6%. Cars were a big part of the number (again) but inflation continues to broaden--the "other" excluding cars and pandemic services is high for the third month in a row.
Inflation is still almost entirely driven by durable goods not services. Durable goods inflation should come down as supply chains unsnarl but what will happen to services is the big question--is drifting up a little bit lately.
One reason to expect services to rise more is that they include shelter--which includes rent and owner's equivalent rent. The CPI is showing a much smaller increase than other measures. They're not comparable but measures of new leases show the future for all leases.
The US-Euro area gap widened a bit in December as well. Looking over twenty-four months on a comparable basis US is 2pp higher. Slightly less comparable but comparing core Euro area to core US ex shelter shows an even larger gap.
Finally this looks at core CPI over different time periods. 24 months avoids base effects (which are relatively small now), 12 months is the headline number, and 3 months is what is happening lately.
In terms of where we're going, this report doesn't do much to clarify--the same exact debates from the last several months are still applicable (including is it temporary supply chain and durables or will it shift to services.
My views on what people got wrong last year and what could happen this year in this (long) thread.
Slowing inflation this year is the most likely scenario, most experts expect it to slow to around 2% in the second half, I would take the over on that.
The problem recently has been in both goods and services. Core goods inflation has typically been about zero but in the run-up to this year had deflation. Now tariff-driven inflation.
And at the same time core services inflation has picked up.
A market slowdown in the pace of job gains, with 22K added in August, bringing the three month average to 29K.
On a percentage basis have not seen job growth this slow outside of recessionary periods in more than sixty years.
The unemployment rate rose from 4.2% to 4.3% (unrounded was a smaller increase).
Wage growth was strong and average hours steady.
All of these are consistent with a marked slowdown in labor supply (due to immigration policy) combined with a continued slight softness in labor demand (as evidenced by the unemployment rate which has been steadily rising at about 0.03 percentage point per month for 2-1/2 years.
But two reasons to be less worried than headline: (1) transitory tariffs & (2) some of this is imputed from rising stock market.
Here are the full set of numbers I'll talk about.
Particularly notable is how much lower market core has been than overall core at every horizon. Note regular core includes imputed items, notably portfolio management fees where the price goes up when the stock market goes up.
Market core is both better predicted by slack and a better predictor of future inflation. It has moved sideways this year. But given that tariffs are (hopefully temporarily) pushing inflation up that suggests that underlying inflation is going down.
The jobs slowdown is here with 73K jobs in July & large downward revisions to May & June bringing the average to 35K/month.
Not quite as bad as you might think because steady-state job growth is much lower in a low net immigration world but unemployment still gradually rising.
A small portion of the weaker jobs numbers in recent months are Federal cuts.
But the bigger issues is the slowdown in private job creation.
My latest @nytopinion attempts to answer the question, "The Tariffs Kicked In. The Sky Didn’t Fall. Were the Economists Wrong?"
Part of my argument is the economy actually has slowed & inflation has picked up, as you would expect.
Plus Trump called off some tariffs and lags.
But there are two broader lessons here:
1. U.S. economy is mostly domestic services. Trade matters but it doesn't matter as much as some of the hype might make you think. (And I confess, I do suffer from TDS, tariff derangement syndrome.)
2. Much of macro is small on a percentage basis. But small things really matter a lot.
0.5% off one year's growth rate and $1,000 per household per year forever are the same. But the former sounds small and the later makes it clear it is a large unforced error.