Headline CPI was 0.5% for December, core was 0.6%. Cars were a big part of the number (again) but inflation continues to broaden--the "other" excluding cars and pandemic services is high for the third month in a row.
Inflation is still almost entirely driven by durable goods not services. Durable goods inflation should come down as supply chains unsnarl but what will happen to services is the big question--is drifting up a little bit lately.
One reason to expect services to rise more is that they include shelter--which includes rent and owner's equivalent rent. The CPI is showing a much smaller increase than other measures. They're not comparable but measures of new leases show the future for all leases.
The US-Euro area gap widened a bit in December as well. Looking over twenty-four months on a comparable basis US is 2pp higher. Slightly less comparable but comparing core Euro area to core US ex shelter shows an even larger gap.
Finally this looks at core CPI over different time periods. 24 months avoids base effects (which are relatively small now), 12 months is the headline number, and 3 months is what is happening lately.
In terms of where we're going, this report doesn't do much to clarify--the same exact debates from the last several months are still applicable (including is it temporary supply chain and durables or will it shift to services.
My views on what people got wrong last year and what could happen this year in this (long) thread.
Slowing inflation this year is the most likely scenario, most experts expect it to slow to around 2% in the second half, I would take the over on that.
Jobs report uniformly weak: 92K jobs lost (with job losses in almost every industry), household survey employment down too, unemployment rate up to 4.4%, participation down, avg weekly hours flat.
Main sign in the other direction was strong wage growth.
The dynamics for private employment look just like overall (86K lost in private with govt basically flat.
Unemployment rate still stable or slightly rising. Breakeven job growth is in the 25-50K range so negative jobs months will be more common and normal going forward. Note 3-month moving average of jobs is 6K so a bit below this range.
More than *all* of the jobs added over the last year have been in private education & health services.
Total jobs: 359K
Private education & health services: 773K
All other sectors: -414K
This might look surprisingly unbalanced. It's actually the opposite.
A 🧵
Here is percentage job growth across sectors over the last year. Dropping the two most extreme they range from 0.8% for leisure & hospitality to -1.5% for information, a 2.2pp difference.
(Note this post generally uses 3 month moving averages to smooth otherwise volatile data.)
This is job growth in 1996. It looks more balanced than 2025 because every industry added jobs. But actually the gap between the second highest (professional services at 5.1%) and second lowest (mining at 0.4%) is 4.7pp. Much more dispersed than this year.
Core CPI inflation rose during the month of January. But it fell and was relatively muted over longer periods of time--although still some concern the numbers a bit lower due to shutdown-related quirks.
On the surface a strong jobs report (130K jobs & unemployment falls to 4.3%).
And just about every detail makes it even stronger: participation up, involuntary part-time down, hours up, wages up.
The mystery of strong GDP and weak jobs is being resolved in the direction of GDP.
The job growth happened despite further cuts in federal jobs. Private employment was up an impressive 172K.
Note, breakeven job growth is currently about 25-50K because of reduced net immigration & also more fully recovered participation. So job growth has slowed but the unemployment rate now seems to have stabilized after slowly and steadily increasing since mid-2023.
I will be enthusiastically supporting faculty legislation to cap the number of A's at Harvard at 20% (plus a bit). The collective action problem that has driven grades higher & higher over time is increasingly problematic. I hope other institutions consider similar steps.
I've talked to numerous colleagues & students about grade inflation. Almost all of them see it as a a problem. I've also heard about as many different ideas for solutions as I've had conversations. I would tweak this proposal in various ways. But would support it over nothing.
One place the current system fails--and it's not the only place--is honors. I'm on the Committee to recommend honors in the economics department. It's increasingly hard to distinguish excellence with so many A's. I believe that now even two A-'s makes you ineligible for Summa.