A closer look at inflation in services excluding energy, this accounts for about 60% of the CPI and 75% of the core CPI.
Over the last three months up at a 4.6% annual rate compared to 2.9% annual rate pre-pandemic.
That excess is adding ~1.2pp to annualized core CPI.
Overall core services are still below trend--but is moving up more quickly so converging towards/above trend. You could look at that and say that our only inflation problem is goods. Or you could look at that and say we have another shoe yet to drop.
Leading candidate for yet-to-drop shoe #1 is housing prices. These are still up relatively slowly for *all* housing as compared to the large increases we're seeing for new leases. All should catch up to new.
Potential yet-to-drop shoe #2: pandemic-related prices. We're still in a pandemic. It has been constraining services demand and service prices. If we return to more normal then expect higher prices for airfare, hotels, events, etc.
Potential yet-to-drop shoe #3: there is some evidence from @jimstockmetrics and Mark Watson that service prices are more sensitive to labor market slack than overall prices. And labor markets much tighter now than they were a year ago. nber.org/papers/w25987
But who knows. I expect an undoing of the abnormal rotation to reduce inflation the question is how much--is it enough to get us to 2%? Does it leave us at 3%? And if it leaves us at 3% is the Fed OK with that (as I think they should be) or do they feel they need to fight it?
BTW, here is the same multiple period picture for durable goods that I showed you for core services.
And repeating the durable goods vs. services comparison over the last 24 months that started this discussion in the first place.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will be enthusiastically supporting faculty legislation to cap the number of A's at Harvard at 20% (plus a bit). The collective action problem that has driven grades higher & higher over time is increasingly problematic. I hope other institutions consider similar steps.
I've talked to numerous colleagues & students about grade inflation. Almost all of them see it as a a problem. I've also heard about as many different ideas for solutions as I've had conversations. I would tweak this proposal in various ways. But would support it over nothing.
One place the current system fails--and it's not the only place--is honors. I'm on the Committee to recommend honors in the economics department. It's increasingly hard to distinguish excellence with so many A's. I believe that now even two A-'s makes you ineligible for Summa.
Depending on how you look at it growth in Q3 was very very strong or very strong or just possibly merely strong. Annual rates:
GDP: 4.3%
Real final sales to domestic purchasers: 2.9%
Average of GDP & GDI: 3.4%
GDI: 2.4%
A big part of the story was consumer spending up at a 3.5% annual rate. Started the year looking weak but new data and revisions have made consumers very strong.
Business fixed investment a bit weaker but also very heterogenous. Equipment investment and IPP up but non-residential structures down for the seventh straight quarter.
Several thoughts on that piece by @nealemahoney & @BharatRamamurti in @nytopinion.
1. They claim price controls are good politically. I'm very open to this being true, I'm under no illusion that what I think is good policy is particularly well correlated with good politics. But I am genuinely interested in more evidence beyond the brief observations they make.
2. They claim that even if you think price controls are a bad idea they can help you pass supply-increasing legislation that is on balance good. Once again, I'm open to this. And in government I've often done 3rd, 7th or 12th best policies because of constraints.