"For urban-type warfare, Russian future plans envisage teams of light and heavy combat unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) working with aerial drones in identifying and attacking targets, while cooperating with manned units and formations for extended periods of time."
They are developing UGV specifically with #urbanwarfare in mind. Platforms include:
- Shturm (Heavy Combat UGV), based on T72 chassis
- Platforma-M (infantry fire support UGV)
The Shturm is part of a concept to develop a robotic "vanguard" to conduct break-ins or breaches, specifically within urban terrain. The aim being to reduce risk to personnel during these very dangerous operations, not necessarily to delivery anything new. defense-update.com/20181209_robot…
Note, that the Uran-9 UGV has already seen operational trials (with updates announced as a result) and there have also been extensive use of UGV by Russian SOF in CT operations. Example below (from a CT op in Dagestan) has 2x thermobaric rocket launchers and a 7.62mm PKM.
So Russia sees urban as a key driver of unmanned ground vehicles, but is mostly focusing on;
a) combat vehicles, and
b) remotely operated
They don't seem to think autonomy is quite there yet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"to assume urban battles will only occur because the objective is to dislodge an enemy force from a city demonstrates a myopic view that ignores the larger picture."
For those who says "we'll just bypass the urban". We rarely get to pick the battles we want. Others get a vote.
"Israeli urban tactics, with swift armor strikes, had been successful in previous conflicts" leading to false confidence.
I got 2003 Baghdad/Basra vibes when reading this. I have heard many extoll the virtues of "Thunder Runs" since, failing to note the poor Iraqi defences.