🔹Two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,
🔹Conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States (OR levy war)
🔹OR to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof.
Treason is almost impossible to charge. It's defined in the Constitution as ⤵️ and the Supreme Court has said that the "enemy" must be a country in which we are at open war--meaning a war declared by Congress.
So what's going on here?
How is it that NOW we get to seditious conspiracy and move up to the level of planners?
I've said this before: Wanna make life easy on defense lawyers? Rush an indictment.
May as well read the indictment here.
Lots of people, lots of charges . . . all charged with seditious conspiracy.
What sets seditious conspiracy apart is the "force" element.
The indictment tells a harrowing story of what is basically a military operation.
2 days after the election, they planned for "civil war" and modeled their operation on the overthrow of Milošević.
He published his plan (screenshot #2) under the headline "WHAT THE PEOPLE MUST DO"
I really wish the "DOJ is doing nothing" people would read this entire indictment and consider the work involved in getting this info. Okay, I'll stop having little rants.
In a group chat: "It will be a bloody and desperate fight."
What did the president know and when did he know it?
(That was another digression and not in the indictment, but inspired by⤵️)
The indictment outlines the detailed planning through December.
Here we see traces of the Brooks Brothers Riot in Florida, organized by Steve Bannon (that was when a riot intimidated the vote counters and stopped the counting of votes in Florida, 2000.)
But Rhodes doesn't think the Senators will listen.
Literally planning a military operation, including a "base of operations" (the Comfort Inn in Arlington) where they stored firearms. #1
Rhodes went on a shopping spree for the occasion. #2
(Premeditated crimes are always more serious).
A "Potomac crossing," screenshot #1
Sent queries about the "ammo situation."
More shopping, screenshot #2
On Jan. 6, the conspirators "communicated and prepared to head to the Capitol."
They approached the Capitol in stack formation wearing tactical gear. #1
They're coordinating through chat messages, which I think means FBI got their phones.
Pence betrayed them and they're sticking to the plan. #2
At 2:00 they are almost to the Capitol. "I'm gonna be a little busy," Watkins warns via chat.
Rhodes entered the restricted Capitol grounds at 2:12.
They stay in stack formation in the Rotunda, and they're "rocking it." #2
While they're pushing back the police line, they're chatting about what they're doing.
Really dumb. It's like keeping a journal of all your crimes.
If you read good crime fiction, you may have the idea criminals are smart masterminds.
Generally, no.
On the evening of Jan. 6, they met in their hotel room to celebrate and plan their next steps. (#1)
They planned to return in the morning.
"We aren't quitting! We are reloading!" (#2)
Then they did more shopping for firearms and ammo. #3
Yes, getting constructing the chats required getting their phones, which started a year ago.
Thanks, @katz_mum
The prosecution has everyone confused because they are framing the case as "election fraud" and "election interference" so everyone is trying to connect the crimes we know about to "election fraud."
This would be clear: "It is election fraud. Here is how the evidence will support a charge of election fraud." Then show how the behavior supports election fraud.
For years I was perplexed by what I was seeing on left-leaning Twitter, political blogs, and partisan reporting.
I had the feeling that, in its way, what I was seeing was comparable to Fox: Lots of bad information and even unhinged conspiracy theories.
2terikanefield.com/invented-narra…
Of course, if I suggested that, I was blasted for "both-sidesing."
Then I discovered an area of scholarship: Communications and the overlap between communications and political science.
Another contradiction: when people demanded indictments RIGHT NOW (in 2021 and early 2022) the reason was, "Everyone knows he's guilty! Look at all the evidence!"
We saw the J6 committee findings.
Trump isn't saying "I didn't do it." He's saying, "I had the right to do it."
2
We all know what he did. The question is, "Do people want a president who acts like Trump?"
A lot of people do.
People show me polls that a guilty finding would change minds.
I say rubbish. Use common sense. He lost in 2020 and he lost the popular vote in 2016. . .
3/
. . . because it is designed to keep people hooked. People need to stay glued to the screen for hour after hour.
But to hook people, you need to scare them. The Facebook whistleblower testified that content that produces strong emotions like anger gets more engagement.
2/
Fox does the same thing. There is a few minutes of news, but the facts get lost as commentators and TV personalities speculate and scare their audiences.
Before you yell at me for comparing MSNBC to FOX, read all of this:
If I write another blog post addressing the outrage cycle here on Twitter and in the MSNBC ecosystem, it will be to explore why so many people who believe they are liberal or progressive actually want a police state.
1/
Today alone, a handful of people who consider themselves liberal or progressive told me that the "traitors need to be arrested and prosecuted."
In 2019, back when I wore myself out tamping down misinformation, I explained the legal meaning of treason.
2/
Back then, I now realize, people asked politely: "Can Trump be prosecuted for treason (over the Russia election stuff).
I explained that wouldn't happen.
Now it's different. It's more like fascist chants.
3/