Michael Thomas Profile picture
Jan 13, 2022 16 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Over the last two months I've read dozens of studies about gas stoves and indoor air quality.

I also installed monitors in our home and ran my own tests.

Here's a thread on what I learned 🧵 #energytwitter
First, I should admit that I was skeptical about the panic over gas stoves at first.

As a climate hawk, I was focused on the emissions.

Gas stoves are responsible for 0.12% of emissions in America. I felt like we should focus on the bigger stuff (furnaces and water heaters).
But then I learned about the negative health impacts of gas stoves.

Researchers have been studying this stuff for decades. And every year, it becomes more clear:

Gas stoves produce unsafe levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2). And that causes respiratory illnesses like asthma.
In Sept, @WHO released their latest guidelines on indoor air pollution.

They recommended no building should have higher than 5.3ppb of NO2 on average throughout the year.

So I set up air quality monitors in my house to see if we passed the test.
Here's a chart showing the average level of NO2 throughout December.

The dotted line is the daily average. The top line is the peak concentration.

Our daily average hovered around 2x the WHO guidelines. Image
Can you guess which day we went out of the town and didn't use our gas stove, furnace or water heater?

Yup, it was the day that NO2 levels plummeted.
Here's what happened every night when we used our stove or oven.

291ppb of peak concentration is... not good.

And that's what it looked like whenever we made dinner.

The only exception: the nights we got takeout and didn't use the gas stove. Image
I asked @jlashk, an environmental epidemiologist to take a look at the data.

He said, "I would say you've got a pretty big NO2 problem."

Not exactly what you want to hear from someone who studies this stuff for a living.
NO2 is especially bad for children.

The first meta-analysis on this topic was published in 1992.

It found that for every 16ppb increase in NO2 levels — comparable to the increase resulting from exposure to a gas stove — the odds of respiratory illness in children go up by 20%.
In 2013 another meta-analysis on the topic came out.

This time the authors concluded, “Children living in a home with gas cooking have a 42% increased risk of having current asthma.”
And think about that for a second.

We've known that gas stoves cause asthma and other respiratory illnesses for 30 years.

Yet, in that same period millions of homes have been built with gas hookups.
The fact that we still allow these things in new construction is crazy.

Most building codes have nothing to say about gas appliances or NO2.

This is a failure of the @EPA and most state and city governments in America.
Like I said, I was skeptical about all this at first. But in study after study that I read, the data showed the same thing.

Gas stoves aren't safe.
You can read more about what I learned and find links to all the sources of data here - carbonswitch.co/how-bad-is-my-…
Shoutout to @jlashk for his research on this topic and helping me make sense of my indoor air quality data.

Thanks to @MothersOutFront @RockyMtnInst and @SierraClub for their advocacy on this issue.

And thanks to @drvolts @rebleber @jeffbradynews for their reporting on this.
Update: lots of people asking about ventilation.

Unfortunately range hoods don't reduce NO2 (see peer-reviewed research below).

In other words, for the context of this research it was irrelevant.

More here -

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Thomas

Michael Thomas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @curious_founder

Jul 2
New data on clean energy's growth just came in and it delivered the good news I needed this week.

Through May, the U.S. added more than twice as much solar power capacity as it did through the same period last year.

There were a few other positive trends in the data:

🧵 Image
Battery storage capacity is growing even faster than solar.

The U.S. has added 384% more storage capacity this year compared to the first 5 months of 2023. Image
While clean energy is growing, fossil fuel power is in decline.

Natural gas capacity growth plummeted in the first 5 months of 2024 compared to the same period in 2023.

The U.S. has added just 162 MW of gas capacity this year. That's just 2% of the solar capacity we've added. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 19
Solar and batteries are expected to make up 80% of new power capacity this year in the U.S.

Both technologies are going to shatter the records they each set in 2023.

🧵 Image
Last year, the U.S. added a record 19.3 GW of utility-scale solar capacity.

That was a big year and represented 72% more than 2022. But it's nothing compared to what's in store this year.

By year's end, the U.S. is expected to add 37.5 GW of capacity (94% y/y growth). Image
Solar's growth is wild—until you compare it to the growth of battery storage.

This year alone, the U.S. is expected to add nearly as much battery storage capacity as the country did over the last *decade.* Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 12
In the last decade, the price of lithium-ion batteries has plummeted.

As a result, we're now building much bigger batteries capable of storing more clean energy.



🧵 distilled.earth/p/the-rise-of-…
Image
As I wrote in a story last year, LIB batteries have quickly gone from providing niche grid services like frequency regulation to storing large amounts of power and supplying energy at times of peak demand.

distilled.earth/p/the-growth-o…
As the role of batteries has shifted, the average project size has risen dramatically.

Just five years ago, the average battery storage project in America had a peak capacity of 4 MW.

The average battery project that has come online this year has had 61 MW of peak capacity.
Read 8 tweets
May 28
Last month, the U.S. built 3,980 MW of carbon-free electricity generating capacity.

So how much fossil fuel capacity did the country build that same month?

1 MW.

🧵 Image
In April 2024, Texas built the most clean energy capacity of any state, adding 435 MW of solar, 528 MW of wind, and 243 MW of battery storage capacity.

Georgia brought the second most online because, well, Vogtle. Image
I wanted to put the 1,206 MW of clean energy capacity Texas built in April in context.

So I checked how much California has built in the first 4 months of this year. Answer: 1,181 MW.

TX built more clean capacity in one month than CA built in the first 4 months of 2024.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 8
To decarbonize homes, we need to install millions of heat pumps.

In 2023, heat pumps outsold gas furnaces for the second year in a row.

I spent the last month trying to understand why. Here's what I learned:

🧵 distilled.earth/p/heat-pumps-o…
Image
Reason #1 -- State and local policies

Over the last decade, more than 130 cities and 10 states have passed laws encouraging homeowners and builders to electrify their homes.

Many of those laws are working.
Maine is a particularly inspiring story.

In just two years, the state doubled its heat pump adoption rate.

It's on track to get heat pumps in every home by 2050. Image
Read 14 tweets
Feb 5
Paris just voted to triple parking fees for SUVs.

This is one of the many policies that has helped Paris go from one of the most polluted, traffic-clogged cities in the world to a sustainability leader.

Here's the story of how Paris took back its streets from cars. Image
One of the first efforts to reduce car dependency in Paris was the launch of a bike-share service called Velib.

These bike-share services are in cities around the world today.

But when Paris launched the program in 2007 it was revolutionary. Image
When the city launched Velib it had a problem though: there was very little bike infrastructure.

That made it dangerous to ride, which in turn made biking unattractive to most people.

Here's a map of the city's bike lanes in 2009.

h/t @marcelemoran Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(