First, I should admit that I was skeptical about the panic over gas stoves at first.
As a climate hawk, I was focused on the emissions.
Gas stoves are responsible for 0.12% of emissions in America. I felt like we should focus on the bigger stuff (furnaces and water heaters).
But then I learned about the negative health impacts of gas stoves.
Researchers have been studying this stuff for decades. And every year, it becomes more clear:
Gas stoves produce unsafe levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2). And that causes respiratory illnesses like asthma.
In Sept, @WHO released their latest guidelines on indoor air pollution.
They recommended no building should have higher than 5.3ppb of NO2 on average throughout the year.
So I set up air quality monitors in my house to see if we passed the test.
Here's a chart showing the average level of NO2 throughout December.
The dotted line is the daily average. The top line is the peak concentration.
Our daily average hovered around 2x the WHO guidelines.
Can you guess which day we went out of the town and didn't use our gas stove, furnace or water heater?
Yup, it was the day that NO2 levels plummeted.
Here's what happened every night when we used our stove or oven.
291ppb of peak concentration is... not good.
And that's what it looked like whenever we made dinner.
The only exception: the nights we got takeout and didn't use the gas stove.
I asked @jlashk, an environmental epidemiologist to take a look at the data.
He said, "I would say you've got a pretty big NO2 problem."
Not exactly what you want to hear from someone who studies this stuff for a living.
NO2 is especially bad for children.
The first meta-analysis on this topic was published in 1992.
It found that for every 16ppb increase in NO2 levels — comparable to the increase resulting from exposure to a gas stove — the odds of respiratory illness in children go up by 20%.
In 2013 another meta-analysis on the topic came out.
This time the authors concluded, “Children living in a home with gas cooking have a 42% increased risk of having current asthma.”
And think about that for a second.
We've known that gas stoves cause asthma and other respiratory illnesses for 30 years.
Yet, in that same period millions of homes have been built with gas hookups.
The fact that we still allow these things in new construction is crazy.
Most building codes have nothing to say about gas appliances or NO2.
This is a failure of the @EPA and most state and city governments in America.
Like I said, I was skeptical about all this at first. But in study after study that I read, the data showed the same thing.
While the scale of clean energy’s growth in 2024 was remarkable, the fact that clean capacity grew isn't all that surprising.
What was shocking to me, however, was just how much of the new power capacity that came online in 2024 was clean.
95% of new capacity was carbon-free.
In 2024, the star of the clean energy show was without a doubt solar energy.
The U.S. added 32.1 GW of new utility-scale solar capacity in 2024. Annual solar capacity additions rose by 65% in 2024 compared to 2023 when the country added 19.5 GW.
Take Buncombe County, where Asheville is located, for example.
The county has 137,123 housing units.
But just 941 of those units—less than 0.7%—have flood insurance through the NFIP, the federal insurance program that issues 97% of the country’s flood insurance plans.
A recent report found that 16,306 properties located in Buncombe County were at risk of flooding in a 1-in-100 year storm.
This example from @TheEconomist's latest article on crypto mining in Texas is crazy.
@TheEconomist I get the argument that bitcoin miners make for why they should be able to participate in demand response programs.
They are a big electricity load and can help cut peak demand.
But these programs were designed to incentivize energy savings. Attracting bitcoin miners with..
@TheEconomist .. a new source of revenue does the opposite. It creates better economics for an activity that has little value beyond financial speculation.
It also makes the economics worse for participants that are sacrificing a productive activity (e.g. making steel to build homes).