Ziad 😷 Fazel 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Jan 14, 2022 39 tweets 23 min read Read on X
#COVID19AB Rapid Antigen Self-Test Approvals 🧵
Health Canada v Europe

Premier Kenney continues to gaslight anyone who will listen on this topic. Today he did it in response to @JuliaWongCBC question around the 47:20 mark of today's COVID theatre.

He worked up the outrage to claim:
• usual distortion & deflection about federal deliveries
• Health Canada has only approved 5-6
• European regulators have approved over 60
• He has been asking feds since April 2020 to approve more tests

So let's look at these claims...
Of the 103 tests Health Canada has approved:
• 37 Point-of-Care Rapid Tests*
• 10 Self-Test*
• 27 Antigen Tests

I don't see where he is getting 6 from.

* some of these are PCR or serum

canada.ca/en/health-cana… Image
Health Canada has already purchased 8 different tests, and distributed 124m to the provinces at no cost.

canada.ca/en/public-heal… Image
Alberta has received over 14m of these 3 tests alone from the federal government:
• BTNX approved Feb 2021
• Abbott Panbio approved Oct and Dec 2020
• BD Veritor approved Oct 2021

canada.ca/en/health-cana… ImageImageImage
The federal government has signed contracts for over 425m of 11 different tests.

At $2.99 billion in cost, that works out to $7.03 each.

How much is Kenney making us pay for 10m "emergency" tests?

"Emergency" but no delivery date for remaining 9m.

canada.ca/en/public-serv… Image
I knew the Premier was gaslighting to @gthomsonink.

Odd for a Premier to be so deep into these procurement details. It suggests political interference, maybe corruption.

He claimed over 60 in Europe "including many which are much more user friendly".

@gthomsonink So when I heard his complaint today about the feds not approving certain test(s) that have been approved in Europe..

(he didn't mention FDA so I figure they haven't approved them either)..

I suspected someone is trying to sell Kenney test(s) approved only in the EU.
Out of curiosity, I checked the other half of his gaslighting: European Approval.

Shocker!

Europe has decided not to approve rapid antigen self-tests.

So where is Kenney getting 60 from?

The number is Zero.

ec.europa.eu/health/sites/d… ImageImage
What does this mean to you?

"The EU common list of antigen tests does not include rapid antigen self-tests. It only includes those rapid antigen tests that are conducted by trained healthcare personnel or trained operators where appropriate.."

ec.europa.eu/health/sites/d… ImageImageImageImage
Having the feds purchase for the provinces gives volume pricing, and prevents provinces bidding against each other with our tax $$.

The feds already have Requests for Standing Offers, through non-partisan Public Services & Procurement Canada (PSPC).

canada.ca/en/public-serv… Image
Why would a supplier sell to Alberta, when they could sell to the feds? Maybe:
• Alberta is paying more
• Product is approved, but supplier is not reliable enough to be qualified
• like a broker who maybe got 1m, but now is on the spot market looking for 9m more at a profit.
Premier cracked me up when he sputtered about asking the feds since April 2020 to approve more rapid tests. @Dave_Khan and I have laughed about this.

Remember Alberta committing to Spartan Bioscience in April 2020 ahead of Health Canada approval?

"Turns out Health Canada was right to take its time testing Spartan’s technology last year. A new investor or owner, assuming one can be found, will now face even more skepticism."

You need both: approved product, and reliable supplier.

ottawacitizen.com/news/local-new…
Well, this was fun. We must do it again sometime, but I have to go to bed now.

Fact-checking the Gaslighter-in-Chief would take 24/7. I pick my spots.

But this has been going on for 2 weeks, and people are scared, being lied to and likely ripped off.

@threadreaderapp unroll
I’m just going to leave this here.
Well, lookie here.

AHS Board Meeting Minutes from 22 Dec 2021 reveal:
• up to $80m approved for COVID-19 rapid test kits
• from vendors **ALREADY ON** the Federal Government standing offer list for supply of Rapid Tests

This is colossally stupid.

albertahealthservices.ca/about/Page1394… ImageImageImageImage
You're welcome to hear the recording of the ~5-min teleconference if you wish, but:
• all discussion had already occurred out of public view
• all board members had already agreed
• the vote was just a formality
• taking under 3 min to perform

I did not know of this Board meeting when I wrote ⤵️, but it is WORSE than I thought.
• Alberta is NOT expanding the supply base beyond vendors ALREADY UNDER CONTRACT TO THE FEDS
• From the list of federally approved products the feds are not already supplying for free. Image
No, it is much more stupid - perhaps unethical- for Kenney to instead:
• use AB Taxpayer $$ to bid against the feds for earlier delivery
• of rapid test kits the feds are already using 🇨🇦 Tax $$ to buy
• which the feds already supply for free to all provinces incl Alberta. Image
Health Minister Copping is well aware of this Zero-Sum game. All he + Kenney are doing with this "Every Man for Himself" strategy is:
• jacking up market price for everyone
• wasting AB taxpayer $$
• screwing up fed plans to supply all 🇨🇦equitably.

In his thread, Minister Copping claims:

"Alberta’s government has directly procured nearly 14 million tests for the province."

Kenney is claiming 10m tests.

The reality is $80m worth, and the more Alberta jacks up the price trying to beat the feds, the fewer tests we'll get.
The feds are trying to nail down deliveries of 140m tests to distribute fairly (per capita, like vaccine) across Canada in January.

Instead of when provinces request, because, eg Alberta:
• did not plan to use them
• point fingers now
• interfere now

globalnews.ca/news/8489323/t…
So my unsolicited advice to Premier @jkenney and Health Min @JasonCoppingAB - as it was with Shandro & Vanch masks, IFR Chlorine Masks, & ABTraceTogether is:
• STFU
• Work with the feds
• Stop wasting AB Taxpayer $$ on cronies and inferior products.
For those of you unfamiliar w Request for Standing Offers (RFSO), a streamlined method of procurement, vendors are dependent on the buyer to behave ethically w multiple standing offers.

IMO, Alberta is interfering with this market.

buyandsell.gc.ca/policy-and-gui…
When I built this thread a few days ago, the feds had 11 different products under contract:
• 425m tests at $7.03 each

As of 14 Jan 2022 update, feds have 16 products under contract:
• 433m tests at $6.93 each

This is the power of working TOGETHER.

canada.ca/en/public-serv… ImageImage
Feds transfer most $/capita for COVID-19 to AB:
• AB uses $80m to bid against Feds
• exclusively & explicitly from rapid test vendors under contract to Feds

@FilomenaTassi @jyduclos @cafreeland
@DuaneBratt @DavidMacCdn @trevortombe @andrew_leach

cbc.ca/news/canada/ca…
🤔This delivery schedule of 3m rapid tests/week seemed bogus when Kenney announced it.

Likely a fabrication to trick people into thinking Return to School on 10 January was safer than it is.

This global Demand>Supply problem didn't spring up overnight.

Image
Since @AHS_media is the prov organization tasked with ordering these $80m of rapid tests from fed suppliers...

..it falls on AHS to confirm this is the delivery schedule they first contracted with supplier(s), then provided the Premier so he could say "scheduled to arrive." ImageImage
On Thu 20 Jan, Premier Kenney's latest lies about rapid tests:
• "Health Dept" told him that US Gov did a "force majeure" 10 days ago on US Supplier under contract to AB
• ordered 1 billion tests from them and banned exports

(No evidence of this.)

And yet, despite this purported US hegemony, the Minister of that same "Health Dept" said they're still expecting:
• 3.5m rapid tests that week (last week)
• 4.5m this week

Wow. I guess the Global Supply/Demand situation isn't that bad after all.

You MAY have noticed we did not receive 3.5m (ANY) rapid tests last wk.

Unless Premier forgot to tell us about this while:
• he was ranting about US/Can vax mandate for cross-border truckers
• his staff were falsely depicting photos of empty shelves overseas as in Alberta
As you know, I only bother to fact-check Kenney when there are larger lessons to be learned, or clear implications of what he is really doing behind the gaslighting.

So let's look at the US rapid test approval & procurement, then compare to Canada, eh?

whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Per White House 14 Jan, USA (pop 332m)
• using Defence Production Act and big $$$ to stimulate production since Feb 2021
• 9 rapid tests approved
• 420m tests under contract

Per Gov of Canada 14 Jan (pop 38m)
• over 50 rapid tests approved
• over 433m tests under Contract ImageImageImageImage
Look again at this colossally stupid decision to restrict AHS only to suppliers already under contract to Feds, so AHS is stuck bidding against Feds.

Why not allow AHS to buy any of the over 50 rapid tests approved by Health Canada?

Are Kenney & Copping setting up AHS to fail? ImageImageImageImage
Rapid Antigen Tests + Medical Masks = GoA plan for safe return to school, and to contain Omicron. But:
• Tying AHS hands = GoA wants Albertans to experience GBD, not RAT.
• Sending kids BYD Non-Medical garbage instead of Medical Masks?

Unconscionable.

If I'm a supplier to the feds, w 10m RATs still avail from January production allocation, who am I selling to:
• Gov of Can w $3b budget for 433m tests at $7 ea?
• GoA w 80m budget, who claim they bought 14m at $5.72 each, and have been lying all month about why they're late?
Now I'm really curious about the first 1m rapid tests Alberta was able to directly procure.

Kenney's desperation allows an intermediary or broker to mark it up big, and book a tidy profit by year-end.

Who were those 1m tests purchased from?
What was the price?
Sole-sourced?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ziad 😷 Fazel 🇺🇦

Ziad 😷 Fazel 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZiadFazel

Dec 23
In Alberta, babies under 1 year old are getting clobbered by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and it is overloading our children's hospitals:
• Hospitalized at 36x the rate of average Albertan
• Hospital & ICU at 3x rate of COVID in babies under 1

alberta.ca/stats/dashboar…Line graph and table of Total hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and deaths among laboratory-confirmed RSV cases in Alberta by age group, 2024-2025
Line Graph and Table of Total hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and deaths among laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases in Alberta by age group, 2024-2025
Typical LaGrange-style quote in reporting by @JenLeeCBC:

"In a statement emailed to CBC News, a spokesperson said the hospital is seeing an increase in respiratory admissions, which "aligns with seasonal trends.""

Likely untrue, despite the vagueness.

cbc.ca/news/canada/ca…
Expecting mothers should speak with their family physician or obstretician (like @FionaMattatall) about getting vaccinated during their pregnancy to protect their newborns. (I'm not a doc)

RSV shots are $1000 each, but perhaps other immunizations.

cbc.ca/news/canada/ca…
Read 5 tweets
Dec 22
Alberta is projected to have its worst influenza vaccine coverage since 2010-2011.

9 weeks into this year's flu shot campaign, we're at 19%. Last year, we were at 23%.

This whole season's coverage projects to 22%.
• last yr 25%
• 2011/12 was 23%

alberta.ca/stats/dashboar…Line graph of cumulative weekly immunizations showing at week 50 of this year's campaign (9 weeks in) 929,380 shots administered so far, which is only 90% of last year's 1,037,278 at the same time.
Line graph of cumulative weekly immunizations showing at week 50 of this year's campaign (9 weeks in) the coverage for all ages is 18.9%
Line graph of cumulative weekly immunizations showing at week 50 of last year's campaign (9 weeks in) 1,037,278 shots administered so far
Line graph of cumulative weekly immunizations showing at week 50 of last year's campaign (9 weeks in) the coverage for all ages was 22.7%.
Seniors 65+, at week 50, 9 weeks into the campaign:
• This year, only 49.2% coverage.
• Last year, 59.4% coverage.

LaGrange's arrogant, deceptive decision to cut off community medical clinics obviously figures largely in this drop.

cbc.ca/news/canada/ca…2024 vaccine coverage for certain ages at week 50, showing only 49.2% for age 65+
2023 vaccine coverage for certain ages at week 50, showing 59.4% for age 65+
Both last year and this year, peak weekly flu shots administered was in week 42:
• This yr, only 243,207
• Last yr, 330,264

Many of us are now off from school or work for the Xmas holidays. Good time to get vaccinated. It should help you for January return to school or work. Column graph of weekly flu shots administered, showing in week 42: • This yr, only 243,207
Column graph of weekly flu shots administered, showing in week 42: • Last yr, 330,264
Table of Influenza vaccine doses administered and coverage by season and provider, showing: • 2010-2011 was 20% • 2011-2012 was 23% • 2023-2024 (last year) was 25% • 2024-2025 to data at week 50 only 19%
Read 5 tweets
Dec 18
3-min video posted 31 Oct 2024 by Liricom & Plenary shows what they expect provincial taxpayers to build + operate for them between airport & "Grand Central Station".

For free.
/h @project_calgary

@DruhFarrell @TheBreakdownAB @CWalcottYYC @jasmine_mian

Before I get into pros and cons, let me just help you figure out their bizarre colours:
🟧 for Calgary Airport Downtown Express track that is at grade or in the 80th Ave tunnel
🟦 Teal (close enough) for stations
🟨 for track that is elevated from Bow River near zoo to Crowchild
Why does it need to be elevated from south shore of Bow River near Zoo, to Downtown West End before Crowchild?

Because CPKC wouldn't let them stay parallel at grade though downtown. Needed to be elevated to not interfere with freight loading/unloading at grade.

"Seamless". Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 16
When UCP claims their elevated track & station #GreenlineYYC design through Beltline into Downtown is better than tunnels, but🚩won't release a single rendering, others will.

😱

Visit @yycbeltline web page, where each image is labelled. You barely recognize the streets after.
@yycbeltline Beltline Neighbourhoods Association tries to recreate Dreeshen's claim that only one "non-driving lane" on 10 Av would be affected (after multi-year construction probably closes the whole street) by rendering only a single column for the track and two columns for station.
@yycbeltline They use structural designs from Sunalta, which is 15 m above ground, but have to render two columns straddling reduced 10 Ave to support Beltline station.

Sunalta station is supported by an enclosed building, with interior stairs, escalators & elevator.

gecarchitecture.com/projects/sunal…
Read 10 tweets
Dec 13
Confirmation GoA's plan for Green Line into downtown is terrible:
• no press conf
• nowhere in press release do they state where it crosses the rail tracks, or meets 7 Ave
• only 1 high level map - no renderings or closeup on downtown
• no AECOM quote

alberta.ca/release.cfm?xI…Screenshot of bottom of press release where you would normally see multimedia or backgrounder. Instead, "Related Information" only has  "map of proposed downtown elevated route".
1-page PDF with 2 maps on it - previous route and GoA proposal - that are so small and high level you cannot see the "map of proposed downtown elevated route" as touted in the press release link.
@TheBreakdownAB @GregGinYYC @DuaneBratt @CWalcottYYC @jasmine_mian @JyotiGondek @cspotweet @AdamMacVicar @LiveWireCalgary @GreenLineYYC Rick Bell's "exclusive" claims the crossing into downtown is at 2nd Street SW, but I refuse to link to that propaganda. @LiveWireCalgary has always provided excellent, deep journalism on #GreenLine and they confirms the crossing AND the cheap blindside.

livewirecalgary.com/2024/12/13/pro… LWC has asked for a copy of the report done by AECOM for further review. A response has not yet been provided.  Calgary city council has also not seen the details, according to several councillors. City admin had apparently not seen the AECOM report before the province released details.  “We have not received the AECOM report before (Minister) Dreeshan ran to (Postmedia columnist) Rick Bell,” wrote Ward 8 Coun. Courtney Walcott via text.  In an official statement, the City of Calgary said that until council had the opportunity to review the report, including alignment and costing, they coul...
@TheBreakdownAB @GregGinYYC @DuaneBratt @CWalcottYYC @jasmine_mian @JyotiGondek @cspotweet @AdamMacVicar @LiveWireCalgary @GreenLineYYC Some quick work with Apple Maps 3D views shows crossing into downtown at 2 St SW requires:
• elevation over a circular ramp and vehicle bridge across the tracks to parkade
• crossing two Plus 15 pedways
• a third Plus 15 medway just north of 7 Ave

calgary.ca/content/dam/ww… 3D map view of crossing into downtown and proposed station at 7 Av and 2 St SW
3D satellite view of crossing into downtown and proposed station at 7 Av and 2 St SW
Calgary Plus 15 map where I have circled the crossing into downtown as well as the proposed station location from https://www.calgary.ca/content/dam/www/transportation/roads/documents/road-maintenance/plus-15-skywalk-network-map.pdf?noredirect=1
Read 11 tweets
Dec 6
With PFC film members leaving Xitter, in last week's PFC, I promised to look into a shared calendar to potentially replace this Community.

Fiona (or anyone else we decide) can create a Google Calendar just for PFC, and share it with specific people.

🧵

support.google.com/calendar/answe…"Share a calendar with specific people" section from link.
My concern about privacy, like everyone's email address shared with everyone else in the group, have been resolved with the oddly-named "See all event details" access permission, which doesn't even show the guest list.

But there are still other privacy concerns I want to check. "Control access to your calendar & individual events" table from link.
Obviously, the owner of the shared calendar would have to know the email addresses of the PFC members who want to subscribe to it.

I don't know if any one of the subscribers can see who the other subscribers are, or their email addresses.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(