The decline in retail sales might actually be a positive sign of a healthy normalization.
The economy has struggled to produce enough goods to match the voracious consumer appetite for them. If goods spending continues to normalize that would be, well, good.
To be clear, the chart in the previous tweet was real retail sales. Nominal retail spending remains very high but in it is no longer buying massive amounts more stuff than it used to be.
(Retail sales is mostly goods but does include services like restaurants and bars.)
The biggest piece of retail sales is spending at motor vehicle and parts dealers (~20 percent of the total). It is up a lot in nominal terms but down in real terms.
Sales at stores selling sporting goods, hobby, musical instruments and books are not nearly as important to the economy (~2% of the total) but they're much more fun and they're WAY up.
People are basically spending a roughly normal amount at restaurants, give or take. But with prices up they're getting less for it in real terms. With this service part of retail sales lagging it suggests the goods part is a bit more above trend than I've shown.
The December numbers plus downward revisions for November have led the bean counters to lower their forecasts for Q4 GDP growth to more like 6% instead of 7%. But that's still very strong. And if that growth is also happening in a more balanced, sustainable way that's good.
P.S. Omicron was just starting to wreak its havoc in December and people were slowly adjusting. I expect a lot more disruption to the January data. But also think that most analysts should mostly look through the January data which will (hopefully, fingers crossed) be anomalous.
P.P.S. Takeout counts as a purchase from "food service & drinking places." So these data don't tell us what happened to face-to-face behavior. But people weren't making a major shift from restaurant-prepared meals to home-prepared meals (w/ grocery store sales down in December).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The problem recently has been in both goods and services. Core goods inflation has typically been about zero but in the run-up to this year had deflation. Now tariff-driven inflation.
And at the same time core services inflation has picked up.
A market slowdown in the pace of job gains, with 22K added in August, bringing the three month average to 29K.
On a percentage basis have not seen job growth this slow outside of recessionary periods in more than sixty years.
The unemployment rate rose from 4.2% to 4.3% (unrounded was a smaller increase).
Wage growth was strong and average hours steady.
All of these are consistent with a marked slowdown in labor supply (due to immigration policy) combined with a continued slight softness in labor demand (as evidenced by the unemployment rate which has been steadily rising at about 0.03 percentage point per month for 2-1/2 years.
But two reasons to be less worried than headline: (1) transitory tariffs & (2) some of this is imputed from rising stock market.
Here are the full set of numbers I'll talk about.
Particularly notable is how much lower market core has been than overall core at every horizon. Note regular core includes imputed items, notably portfolio management fees where the price goes up when the stock market goes up.
Market core is both better predicted by slack and a better predictor of future inflation. It has moved sideways this year. But given that tariffs are (hopefully temporarily) pushing inflation up that suggests that underlying inflation is going down.
The jobs slowdown is here with 73K jobs in July & large downward revisions to May & June bringing the average to 35K/month.
Not quite as bad as you might think because steady-state job growth is much lower in a low net immigration world but unemployment still gradually rising.
A small portion of the weaker jobs numbers in recent months are Federal cuts.
But the bigger issues is the slowdown in private job creation.
My latest @nytopinion attempts to answer the question, "The Tariffs Kicked In. The Sky Didn’t Fall. Were the Economists Wrong?"
Part of my argument is the economy actually has slowed & inflation has picked up, as you would expect.
Plus Trump called off some tariffs and lags.
But there are two broader lessons here:
1. U.S. economy is mostly domestic services. Trade matters but it doesn't matter as much as some of the hype might make you think. (And I confess, I do suffer from TDS, tariff derangement syndrome.)
2. Much of macro is small on a percentage basis. But small things really matter a lot.
0.5% off one year's growth rate and $1,000 per household per year forever are the same. But the former sounds small and the later makes it clear it is a large unforced error.