The decline in retail sales might actually be a positive sign of a healthy normalization.
The economy has struggled to produce enough goods to match the voracious consumer appetite for them. If goods spending continues to normalize that would be, well, good.
To be clear, the chart in the previous tweet was real retail sales. Nominal retail spending remains very high but in it is no longer buying massive amounts more stuff than it used to be.
(Retail sales is mostly goods but does include services like restaurants and bars.)
The biggest piece of retail sales is spending at motor vehicle and parts dealers (~20 percent of the total). It is up a lot in nominal terms but down in real terms.
Sales at stores selling sporting goods, hobby, musical instruments and books are not nearly as important to the economy (~2% of the total) but they're much more fun and they're WAY up.
People are basically spending a roughly normal amount at restaurants, give or take. But with prices up they're getting less for it in real terms. With this service part of retail sales lagging it suggests the goods part is a bit more above trend than I've shown.
The December numbers plus downward revisions for November have led the bean counters to lower their forecasts for Q4 GDP growth to more like 6% instead of 7%. But that's still very strong. And if that growth is also happening in a more balanced, sustainable way that's good.
P.S. Omicron was just starting to wreak its havoc in December and people were slowly adjusting. I expect a lot more disruption to the January data. But also think that most analysts should mostly look through the January data which will (hopefully, fingers crossed) be anomalous.
P.P.S. Takeout counts as a purchase from "food service & drinking places." So these data don't tell us what happened to face-to-face behavior. But people weren't making a major shift from restaurant-prepared meals to home-prepared meals (w/ grocery store sales down in December).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Overall the jobs report is reassuring. A healthy 142K jobs added, average weekly hours increased, participation stayed the same, and most importantly the unemployment rate fell back to 4.2%.
Pace of job growth (adjusting for benchmark revision) mostly unchanged over last year.
Here's the unemployment rate. It is what most people were watching most closely because of difficulties measuring monthly jobs and knowing what numbers for them are hot or cold. It broke from four increases in a row to tick down as the surge in temporary layoffs receded a little.
Reason to be cautious as the Sahm rule is still triggered. I don't find the mitigating arguments fully persuasive (e.g., the increase is due to labor supply not demand or hiring down not firing up). But more important, may simply be like other recession indicators-very imperfect.
1. Do not tax the normal return to capital, instead tax consumption.
2. IF you're taxing capital gains, better to tax a broader base & lower rate with more neutrality, so tax accruals.
I come back to this below, the Platonic ideal may not be achievable in practice. And the "standard" theory may be wrong because it leaves out important considerations. But still, worth taking seriously.
On the second, the argument is that FOR A GIVEN LEVEL OF CAPITAL TAXATION it is better to have a broader base and a lower rate. A [10%] capital gains tax on accrued gains leads to less distortions than a 23.8% tax on realized gains.
Moreover, the relatively little core inflation we've had in the last three months was more than entirely shelter. If you take shelter out then the annual rates are:
The big news in this morning's job release is the unemployment rate up to 4.3% while job growth slows to 114K, wage growth slows and average weekly hours fall. The only contra-indicator was labor force participation up 0.1pp.
The Sahm recession indicator has triggered. This is a variant of a rule Goldman Sachs economists developed--and was the basis for the fiscal stimulus calls that many of us were making in late 2007 and early 2008 when there was a similar run-up of unemployment.
There are stories now about the unemployment rate increase being inflows of immigrants. And we're not seeing increase in layoffs that are more reassuring than the past. But it is still unnerving to see what has been a reliable signal in the past get triggered.
Here are the full set of numbers I'll be discussing in this thread.
Before I go any further, here is actual inflation (including food and energy). It was basically non-existent in May and June as sharp falls in energy prices nearly offset all the other price increases (food price growth was moderate).