😀 Thread on the importance of FUN and how this is misconstrued, particularly in the youth sectors of big pro clubs in Europe. This creates a perpetuating cycle which other youth coaches then emulate, damaging the experience players have of our sport.
Many GMs and coaches don’t think high level youth prospects can be developed while having fun. I have no idea why this is the case. Credit to a great book I am reading “Myths of Sport Coaching” (HIGHLY RECOMMEND), where many studies on this topic referenced.
🧠 Where does this stem from? The work of Daniel Kahneman was referenced in the book. As humans we hold onto existing schemas that result in errors in our thinking. This is very prevalent in 🏀 coaches, seeing fun as something only needed for rec ball.
😁Myths of Coaching highlighted the work of Visek et al., with studies showing that what was considered fun in sport is far more universally similar among different ages, genders and playing abilities than previously thought.
Visek’s study observed Trying Hard, Positive Team Dynamics and Positive Coaching were a top priority for both girls and boys. ➡️ Unfortunately two of these elements (Team Dynamics & Positive Coaching) are frequently neglected in a lot of youth practices I observe here in Europe.
Recently heard of one of the “leading” academies in Europe bans players for 3 days from practice for making mistakes/ going off script in a set (which is what we want anyway)! What type of example is this setting? This is simply totally archaic.
Large amounts of money are being spent by Euro clubs to buy prospects, but nothing is spent on surrounding them with transformational, growth-mindset coaches as well as coach education. Imagine the results these clubs could get if they created proper player development pathways?
A lot of “big clubs” in Europe turn a blind eye to abusive coaching practices which are tantamount to bullying. As a coaching community it is so important we challenge such behavior and create more fulfilling environments for our players.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Instead of putting players through a scripted routine of pre-determined 1 on 0 techniques, literally just play defense to improve the effectiveness of individual workouts. Use varying starts, always in a new location, with specific constraints on the offense (eg only threes).
I respect coaches who spend significant amounts of time planning their workouts. I still plan, but in a very different way. I avoid going through a list of specific techniques (aka “moves”) I want to impart on the player as the “correct” way of doing something.
Instead I look at what the player specifically needs as well as giving giving them an input in the workout. I then play “guided defense” most of the time, using my positioning to replicate situations seen by real defenders in a game.
While there are some consistencies with the jump shot, no shot is ever the same. Coaches talk about and attempt to train players to use the exact same, “repeatable technique” but this is impossible. What constraints affect the shooting motion? Read on… @BBallImmersion
▪️Distance from the basket (Elliott, 1992; Elliott & White, 1989; Miller & Bartlett, 1993)
▪️Presence of a defender (Rojas, Cepero, Ona, & Gutierrez, 2000)
▪️Body posture at ball release (Ripoll, Bard, & Paillard, 1986)
▪️Other movements completed by the player before shooting (Lorenzo & Arago ́n, 2003)
▪️Field of view (Oudejans, van de Langerberg, & Hutter, 2002; Ripoll et al., 1986)
▪️Physical characteristics of the player (Hudson, 1985b; Rojas et al., 2000)
💊Thread: re-thinking traditional "basketball vitamins"
👉This is the closest we would get to vitamins. Instead of 1-on-0, using scripted defense. The cut-off cues a protection plan, which must be different every time. Nash, Barkley, Bounce Out or Back-Pivot.
💡Rep without rep
The problem with normal vitamins in player development is that players make 95%+ of all their reps. This shows the level of difficulty is far from desirable and therefore any supposed effect from the "vitamins" is completely negated. Even a scripted D = more challenge
3⃣ Stay for x3 reps, then change roles, then change locations.
🌬️Typical vitamins are completely unopposed (1v0) and lacking in any form of task representativeness.
💡I do not believe in vitamins because every week the conditions are changing. Plus doing the same thing is boring!