Instead of putting players through a scripted routine of pre-determined 1 on 0 techniques, literally just play defense to improve the effectiveness of individual workouts. Use varying starts, always in a new location, with specific constraints on the offense (eg only threes).
I respect coaches who spend significant amounts of time planning their workouts. I still plan, but in a very different way. I avoid going through a list of specific techniques (aka “moves”) I want to impart on the player as the “correct” way of doing something.
Instead I look at what the player specifically needs as well as giving giving them an input in the workout. I then play “guided defense” most of the time, using my positioning to replicate situations seen by real defenders in a game.
I believe many coaches mistake 🏀 for Pokémon - “Gotta catch ‘em all.” Basketball is nothing like this. Players do not need all these moves on moves on moves. One solution which they can adapt an endless variety of ways is far more effective.
The best way to develop this is through examples shown in the video above. Most of the time, playing against other real defenders is the best way to do this. The advantage of the individual is the time on task is so high so the player gets so much repetition (without repetition).
Soon it will get to a point with this player where a change in individual constraints will make this type of practice less effective. With Linus being 6ft 3, I am the same height and can (just about!) move well enough to replicate defenders at a decent EU youth level.
Linus is 16 though. He will continue to grow and also as he develops his body through strength training (while mine declines through aging!), there will be a time soon where my defense is not challenging enough. I can change task constraints but a better def is the best solution.
This is why I do not think current trends in the NBA and other pro leagues with players playing against coaches is task representative. It’s the same in the NCAA vs student managers.
Playing against other players is the best solution, and designing the workout so players interact with as many different players as possible is key (respecting the role of individual constraints).
On a side note, for players of an age where vs coach is still effective, it’s a great way to stay in shape! This is how I’m completing @lono610’s January well-being challenge (every goal met but the alcohol goal has alluded me. Living in Piemonte is too tough! 🇮🇹🍷)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Sarama

Alex Sarama Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexJSarama

Jan 14,
😀 Thread on the importance of FUN and how this is misconstrued, particularly in the youth sectors of big pro clubs in Europe. This creates a perpetuating cycle which other youth coaches then emulate, damaging the experience players have of our sport.
Many GMs and coaches don’t think high level youth prospects can be developed while having fun. I have no idea why this is the case. Credit to a great book I am reading “Myths of Sport Coaching” (HIGHLY RECOMMEND), where many studies on this topic referenced.
🧠 Where does this stem from? The work of Daniel Kahneman was referenced in the book. As humans we hold onto existing schemas that result in errors in our thinking. This is very prevalent in 🏀 coaches, seeing fun as something only needed for rec ball.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 6,
While there are some consistencies with the jump shot, no shot is ever the same. Coaches talk about and attempt to train players to use the exact same, “repeatable technique” but this is impossible. What constraints affect the shooting motion? Read on… @BBallImmersion
▪️Distance from the basket (Elliott, 1992; Elliott & White, 1989; Miller & Bartlett, 1993)
▪️Presence of a defender (Rojas, Cepero, Ona, & Gutierrez, 2000)
▪️Body posture at ball release (Ripoll, Bard, & Paillard, 1986)
▪️Other movements completed by the player before shooting (Lorenzo & Arago ́n, 2003)
▪️Field of view (Oudejans, van de Langerberg, & Hutter, 2002; Ripoll et al., 1986)
▪️Physical characteristics of the player (Hudson, 1985b; Rojas et al., 2000)
Read 4 tweets
Nov 17, 2021
💊Thread: re-thinking traditional "basketball vitamins"
👉This is the closest we would get to vitamins. Instead of 1-on-0, using scripted defense. The cut-off cues a protection plan, which must be different every time. Nash, Barkley, Bounce Out or Back-Pivot.
💡Rep without rep
The problem with normal vitamins in player development is that players make 95%+ of all their reps. This shows the level of difficulty is far from desirable and therefore any supposed effect from the "vitamins" is completely negated. Even a scripted D = more challenge
3⃣ Stay for x3 reps, then change roles, then change locations.
🌬️Typical vitamins are completely unopposed (1v0) and lacking in any form of task representativeness.
💡I do not believe in vitamins because every week the conditions are changing. Plus doing the same thing is boring!
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(