Biden actually had a pretty good week. He got the media to focus on Sinema, ramping up the pressure on her going forward. The Supreme Court volunteered to take the blame for any further COVID problems. And Trump’s legal troubles are set to climax during the midterms.
The media’s narrative about Biden having a “bad week” is based on false representations of his approval rating, the false claim that voting rights legislation is dead, the false notion that this Supreme Court ruling somehow hurts him, and nonsense about a Trump comeback.
It’s more important than ever that you all understand why the media makes up these lies: RATINGS. It’s not partisanship, it’s not personal, it’s not anything but RATINGS. Until you understand this fact, you’ll be confused by every single thing the media does.
When you watch Fox News, you’re watching fictional reporting on events that never happened.

But when you watch MSNBC or CNN (or most of the pundits on twitter), you’re watching a fictional doomsday spin on the events that happened – which isn’t that much better than Fox News.
And again, literally all of this media villainy is due to ratings. Fox News isn’t trying to get republicans elected; it’s trying to hit ratings marks by giving right wing rubes a reason to stay tuned in. And the rest of the media just says whatever will keep its audience watching
I used to do Q&A sessions on here, but I stopped because 80% of your questions were “why does / doesn’t the media do this or that” and every time my answer was “ratings” and most of you couldn’t process that answer whenever I gave it.
Major media outlets exist for ratings, and you’re the product that they sell to advertisers. Most of you don’t want that to be true, because you think of MSNBC hosts and twitter pundits as your friends. But their job is literally to hit their ratings marks, not to inform you.
The better hosts and pundits try to slip some truth in there while pushing the narratives that they (or their bosses) have determined are going to get them to the tv ratings and/ or retweets that they need in order to be viable. But their job is still literally to hit those marks

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

16 Jan
The 14th Amendment is not a magic wand that you can just wave to keep insurrectionist politicians off the ballot. As we've long said, that kind of battle has to be waged in court. That's now happening in a test case against Madison Cawthorn. But it'll take time, and may not work.
"But why don't the Democrats just..." because they can't. Just because the constitution says something, it doesn't mean you can just magic wand it into happening. The Democrats can't just say "Madison Cawthorn you're out" and have him fall through a trap door. This is reality.
For instance, the 5th Amendment makes very clear to me that airport security is unconstitutional, but I can't just announce that and magically make airport security go away. It would have to be done in court. And I'd lose, because the courts are idiots about the 5th Amendment.
Read 6 tweets
16 Jan
In what might be the worst major newspaper article of all time, WaPo spends 30 paragraphs implying the DOJ is not investigating Trump's allies for 1/6, before confirming in paragraph #31 that the DOJ is investigating Roger Stone and Rudy Giuliani for 1/6:
washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
When major newspaper articles rely on inside sourcing, they're often constructed in a Frankenstein manner. The source insists on a certain misleading slant or narrative in exchange for inside info, so the article starts off hyping that misleading narrative to please the source.
Then 20-30 paragraphs in, the article reveals the bombshell piece of information that the source unwittingly let slip. The author presumably buries the bombshell that deep in the article, in the hope the source won't even read that far, and thus won't get pissed off.
Read 6 tweets
15 Jan
We won't gain a single vote in 2022 by running around yelling "our democracy is nearly dead." That kind doomsday hysteria will COST us votes. If yelling this kind of stupid shit is your strategy, please rethink your strategy, or think about leaving political activism entirely.
Even if you THINK our democracy is nearly dead – which it's not, but even if you think that – you don't use it as slogan. Winning elections is about marketing your side to less enthused folks who are vaguely on your side and need motivation to go out and vote for your side.
Who feels excited to get up off the couch and vote for the side that' yelling some variation of "we're all gonna die, we're doomed"? NO ONE. You're unwittingly telling them that all hope is lost anyway, so there's no point in bothering to vote. You're telling them to stay home.
Read 5 tweets
14 Jan
The doomsday types are now insisting Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes will never flip. There's no basis for this. But even if they are right, it's why the feds indicted a DOZEN Oath Keepers leaders today. You only need ONE to flip. Believe it or not, DOJ knows what it's doing.
These doomsday types end up proven wrong on every prediction they make. But even if one of their doomsday predictions ever did happen, it still wouldn't result in the doomsday outcome they've predicted. It's all just fear-driven gibberish designed to scare you for attention.
Even if these types were just clueless and honestly mistaken about how everything works, you'd think their predictions would come true, like, one-fourth of the time (think multiple choice test). But they're wrong 100% of the time. You can't do that unless you're wrong on purpose.
Read 7 tweets
13 Jan
To you defeatist losers who are tripping over each other today to yell the most loudly that our democracy is dead: FUCK YOU. You're just sabotaging those of us who are trying to fight and win. You know what's at stake, and you don't want to win – which makes you traitors.
And if you're enabling or making excuses for these doomsday types, then fuck you too! You're just as bad. You admit we're in the the fight of our lives, but you WANT TO LOSE. On an actual battlefield, that approach would get you court martialed. It's no less treasonous on here.
Even if these defeatist losers were right – which they're not, but even if they were – how would they be helping by constantly yelling that it's over we're gonna lose no matter what? These are sick, fucked up people who WANT TO LOSE. They are your mortal ENEMY in this fight.
Read 8 tweets
13 Jan
The DOJ didn’t wake up today and randomly decide to arrest the Oath Keepers leadership. In reality the DOJ spent all year painstakingly flipping people upward – while pundits insisted it was doing “nothing” – so it could be in position to take out Oath Keepers leadership today.
No serious person would ever have believed that the Garland DOJ was doing “nothing” about 1/6 instigators. The real questions were what the DOJ was specifically doing behind the scenes, whether it would succeed, and whether we’d end up agreeing with the strategy.
Now we’re getting some answers. DOJ apparently waited until cases against all twelve Oath Keepers leaders were ready, then busted them all at once today. Now they’ll each feel pressure to hurry up and flip before any of the eleven others can.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(