BREAKING - we reached a settlement with the State of CA, and they will be PERMANENTLY REMOVING the Aztec chants from the Ethnic Studies Model Cirriculum and paying $100,000 towards our attorneys’ fees. My statement is in the thread below:
We filed this lawsuit after we discovered that California’s Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, a resource guide for local school districts, included prayers to Aztec gods – the same deities that were invoked when the Aztecs worshipped with human sacrifices.
The Aztec prayers at issue – which seek blessings from and the intercession of these demonic forces – were not being taught as poetry or history.
Rather, the ESMC instructed students to chant the prayers for emotional nourishment after a “lesson that may be emotionally taxing or even when student engagement may appear to be low.” The idea was to use them as prayers.
In fact, the co-chair of California’s ESMC, Tolteka Cuauhtin, wrote that Christians committed “Theocide” to oppress marginalized groups – and the response should be to “regenerate indigenous spiritual traditions.”
The subject Aztec prayers, which invoke these deities by name, appear to be part of Tolteka’s proposed solution.
Fortunately, the parties were able to work out an informal resolution – and the State Board of Education and California Department of Education voluntarily agreed to remove the prayers from the ESMC. The State agreed to do this while continuing to dispute any and all liability.
Nonetheless, we’re pleased that the prayers have been officially removed from the ESMC.
All local school districts in California – especially those still working with Mr. Tolteka Cuauhtin – should follow the lead of the State and are hereby on notice that they should immediately remove these Aztec prayers from their Ethnic Studies curricula.
Our team of lawyers will aggressively pursue civil litigation against any local school district that violates the Constitution and incorporates these Aztec prayers in class – particularly now that the State has excised them from the ESMC.
BREAKING - THANKS BE TO GOD, WE OBTAINED A MAJOR VICTORY AT THE 9TH CIRCUIT FOR OUR CLIENTS IN THE SDUSD VACCINE MANDATE LITIGATION.
Here is the decision issued tonight: thomasmoresociety.org/.../9-circuit-….... The Court's full ruling will follow shortly.
We are very pleased with the Ninth Circuit’s grant of the rare remedy of emergency injunctive relief pending appeal, which prevents the San Diego Unified School District’s vaccine mandate – one of the harshest in the nation – from going into operation on November 29, 2021.
Although the case is still in its early stages, this is a significant victory. SDUSD should promptly revise its policy to include religious exemptions for students.
He stood firm in the face of fines, threats of imprisonment, massive civil litigation, a contempt proceeding, and a retaliatory attempt to revoke his church’s 45 year old parking lot lease. His crime?
Exercising his God-given and constitutionally protected right to practice his faith and hold church services without arbitrary interference from the state. He had faith in God and courage (and some good lawyers I might add 😀), and he emerged VICTORIOUS
— and now the County of LA and State of CA are paying him $800,000 to cover his attorneys’ fees and settle his case.
It’s been an honor and privilege to represent Pastor John MacArthur with @JennaEllisEsq. This is an incredible story of faith, perseverance, and courage.
Yes, there are judges in CA that understand the Constitution and are willing to take bold action to uphold it. Some notable quotes from Judge Chalfant when he correctly ruled last Friday that LA County had not met its burden to single out churches and ban indoor services at GCC:
"THE GOVERNOR CAN'T JUST ISSUE POLICIES WITHOUT A RATIONAL BASIS TO DO SO. TO MY KNOWLEDGE HE NEVER HAS DEVELOPED A RATIONAL BASIS TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN BUSINESSES. THIS IS ALL SORT
OF SHOOTING FROM THE HIP. WHICH IS UNDERSTANDABLE AT THE BEGINNING OF AN EMERGENCY ...
AND LESS UNDERSTANDABLE AS TIME GOES ON. THAT'S POINT ONE..."
"ALTHOUGH THE MOVING PAPER PURPORTS TO TREAT CHURCHES THE SAME AS OTHER BUSINESSES, THAT IS
CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG. THEY'RE ENTITLED TO HEIGHTENED PROTECTION, NOT TO BE TREATED LIKE A HAIR SALON."