1
This marble Murti of Lord Brahma was broken in 8 pieces, torso removed, desecrated & plundered by Mahmud of Ghazni from a Hindu temple he destroyed. It was discovered by the Italian Archaeological Mission in 1957 while excavating the ruins of Ghazni’s palace in Afghanistan.
2
The face was completely worn away - destroyed by thousands of feet stepping on it to mark Islamic supremacy over Hinduism. Following Islamic tradition, Mahmud had buried it under a doorway, so Muslims would constantly step on it as an act of ultimate humiliation for Hindus.
3
Countless plundered Hindu artifacts like this Murti were abducted by Ghazni to be trampled upon. The Italian team stated that the find represented “an un-hoped for & stimulating evidence of trophies brought to Ghazni from India, following the triumphs of the Ghaznavids.”
4
Excavation of Ghazni's palace revealed irrefutable evidence that Hindu deities were defaced & kept as trophies with stolen artifacts. Another Hindu statue & a Jain Tirthankara were found in the Northern portion of the palace earlier & kept in the Royal Collection at Kabul.
5
Leftist historians tout the myth that Mahmud’s goal of accumulating wealth & power meant his attacks were secular & not religious wars. But the evidence of broken Hindu deities abducted & kept as trophies clearly proves his intention was solely to establish the rule of Islam.
6
Muslim historians like Sibli describe in detail how Mahmud transported an immense museum of invaluable treasures from India. The extent of plunder & damage to sacred Hindu artifacts from not just Somnath but also Mathura, Nagarkot, Kanauj, Gwalior & Thanesar, is immeasurable.
7
In January 1026 CE, Mahmud defiled the Somnath temple, broke the holy Jyotirlinga into 4 pieces, killed thousands & plundered all its gold & jewels in the name of Islam. Minhaj-i-Siraj Juzjani's book Tabaqat-I-Nasiri & Al Biruni refers to this specific event in gory detail.
8
Islamic historian Ferishta also states that Mahmud broke the Jyotirlinga into pieces, to be buried under the threshold of his Arusu ‘l-Falak (celestial Bride) mosque. Al Utbi records Mahmud using melted gold idols & materials from plundered Indian temples to build mosques.
9
Somnath was the target of Mahmud’s savagery because it was similar to Al-Manat - one of the 3 pre-Islamic deities in the Kaaba temple of Mecca which were destroyed by the Prophet of Islam. Thus 2 pieces of the Somnath Jyotirlinga were sent to be buried at Mecca & Medina.
10
In 1014, Mahmud plundered Taneshar famous for the holy temple of Chakrasvamin. The stunning Murti was made of special bronze & as tall as a man. Unable to destroy it, Mahmud had it uprooted & buried in the hippodrome in Ghazni with a piece of the Somnath Jyotirlinga.
11
Al - Utbi narrates Mahmud’s savage raid of Mathura in 1018, describing its immense splendor. Mathura had more than 1000 rich temples with one central temple (Janamasthan?) higher & grander than all the others embellished with 5 gold Murtis, rubies, sapphires, silver, etc.
12
The extent of plunder can be estimated by the fact that the Feet of just one of the plundered Murtis yielded 4400 Miskals(~6 kg) of gold. After Kanauj, Mahmud destroyed a Brahma temple at Nardin- could this be the Brahma image discovered at Ghazni?
13
The loot from plundering & destroying Nagarkot temple (Kangra) was even more immense. Ferishta describes the plunder of 700,000 Gold Dinars, 700 Mans of gold & silver plate (12,600 kg), 200 Mans (5400 kg) of pure gold ingots & 2000 mans (36000 kg) of unwrought silver.
14
Mahmud returned to Ghazni with the immense booty, to celebrate a 3 day long festival & feast of Islam's triumph, where all the Hindu artifacts were displayed on golden thrones & tables of precious metals. Loot was distributed & desecrated deities were mocked by the Muslims.
15
In 1019, Mahmud raided & destroyed the 7 forts of Kanauj, which held more than 10,000 temples. The Hindus who died defending them said the temples were 200, 000 years old. Besides the astronomical amount of plundered booty, Hindu heritage suffered irreversible damage.
16
Mahmud was so dazzled by the beauty of Hindu temples, that he enslaved & abducted 1000s of craftspeople to Ghazni. He tried desperately to imitate the grandeur of Mathura & Somnath- by working them to death building & embellishing mosques, as pathetic copies to glorify Islam.
17
The grand Jami Masjid of Ghazni, where part of Somnath Jyotirlinga was buried, was built by Hindu slaves working day & night to carve marble, build domes & arches, gild paintings & pillars with gold from melted Murtis & “crush bodylike idols & fasten them in doors & walls.”
18
Ghazni's crowning achievement - the “Arusu’I-Falak” (Bride of Heaven) mosque was built using stolen carved wood panels, marble slabs, pillars gilded with gold from melted Hindu deities, carpets, lamps, gems & silver & gold jewels plundered from Hindu temples.
19
Mahmud’s plunder of Hindu temples was immensely profitable, given the treasure of bounties he stole. His savage hatred against Hinduism was so admired by Muslims, that one historian called him the "hammer" of the Hindus, with his fame as an “Islamic hero” reaching Baghdad.
20
Mahmud is famous for turning Ghazni into the greatest Islamic state of the time with palaces, gardens, mosques, Madrasas, minarets, bridges, libraries etc. What is not famous however is that all these institutions were built & run by Hindu slaves kidnapped during his raids.
21
He is celebrated as the first “Sultan” for his intellect & "love" for art. In truth he was a savage fanatic & rapacious thief, with the sole purpose of religious war against Hindus. This "grand" trait earned him the titles of “Victor” and “Idol-breaker,” Ghazi and But-shikan.
22
Ironically, the "Great Sultan’s" dynasty lost its power right after his death, & Ghaznī the great Islamic state was sacked & burnt to the ground in 1150–51 CE by the Ghūrids. Mongol armies of Genghis Khan, led by his son Ogedei Khan. razed it to rubble in the 13th c.
23
Today, Ghazni is a dump of poverty & violence, run by terrorists. Mahmud represented just one of many evil forces who tried to destroy Hinduism. But the resilience of an eternal Dharma ensured that the grand temples of Somnath & Mathura rise once again in shining splendor
24
Sources:
Flight of Deities & Rebirth of Temples - Meenakshi Jain
Summary Report on the Italian Archaeological Mission in Afghanistan (1957-58)
Tabaqat I Nasiri - Minhaj-i Siraj Juzjani
Tarikh I Firishta - Firishta
Al-Hind: The making of the Indo-Islamic world - Andre Wink

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Savitri Mumukshu - सावित्री मुमुक्षु

Savitri Mumukshu - सावित्री मुमुक्षु Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MumukshuSavitri

Jun 21
This LIE that Brahmanas burnt down Nalanda will be put to rest once & for all with this 🧵of undeniable evidence

The book that is being cited to support this horrific lie is Taranatha’s “History of Buddhism in India”. First this book is not considered a histiography because it cites many supernatural miracles to glorify Buddhism. However even if we ignore all that, Taranatha himself provides the unexpected clues that leftists deliberatrly leave out to distort history.

The first clue is that Taranatha describes the history of Sri Nalendra (Nalanda) in elaborate detail as a monastery where “more than a 1000 Brahmans & an EQUAL number of Tirthikas took up ordination”
This CLEARLY proves that in Taranatha’s context Tirthikas & Hindu Brahmanas were NOT the same otherwise why would he mention them as SEPARATE categories in the same sentence?

In another reference Taranatha clearly refers to Buddhists converting BOTH Brahmanas & Tirthikas to Buddhism in Gujarat. Why would he say this if they were one & the same? Yet another reference refers to Buddhists separately defeating a Nirgrantha, a Brahmana & a Tirthika in a debate.

Clearly Brahmana & Tirthika were separate categories.Image
Image
Image
Image
Now that Taranatha’s own passages have established that Brahmanas & Tirthikas were NOT the same, let’s see what the real role of Brahmanas was as described by Taranatha himself.

In chapter 20, Taranatha describes the famous episode of the king’s minister holding an inaugral feast at a temple in Nalanda, where Buddhist Sramanas bullied two Tirthika beggars & unleashed dogs on them. This angered them so much that they practiced austerities to gain Siddhis & take revenge

After 12 years the Tirthika attained Siddhis, & performed a fire worship whose ashes produced fire which burnt down Nalanda & its libraries. But the most CRUCIAL part that Leftists like DN Jha cleverly leave out of Taranatha’s account is at the end of the story where Taranatha says that the Nalanda “temples damaged by the fire were reconstructed by King Buddhapaksa, the BRAHMANA Śanku, the BRAHMANA Brihaspati & many householders.”

In the next chapter, Tarantha further describes how this same Brahmana Śanku knew esoteric magic about Nagas & was a devout Hindu who built a Vaisnavite Garuda Stambha for protection against snakebites. Thus there is no question that Śanku clearly was a Hindu Brahmana.

This is conclusive proof that Brahmanas were not involved in the burning of Nalanda & its libraries, but they actively reconstructed & rebuilt the structures at Nalanda after the fire. This decisively busts leftist lies about Brahminical fanatics persecuting Buddhists.Image
Image
Image
The fact that Brahmanas constantly helped Buddhists is further corroborated by Tibetan Buddhist monk Dharmasvamin (1235 AD) who visited Nalanda & Bihar a few decades after Khalji had destroyed Nalanda & other Buddhist Viharas of Magadha. He describes Hindus giving alms to Buddhist monks & a Brahmana named Jayadeva saving the last Buddhist abbot of Nalanda, Rahul’s Sri Bhadra from a Muslim attack

Ramasimha the Hindu Raja of Tirhut even asked Dharmasvamin to become his chaplain. And even when he refused, the Hindu king respectfully showered him with valuable presents. This was the true face of Hindus, who despite debate & conflict lived harmoniously with BuddhistsImage
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 21
Is this some kind of joke? Can you deny the evidence provided by Tipu Sultan himself in his OWN words in letters & his manifesto describing his desire to wipe out Hinduism & mass convert Hindus by his sword, for the "Glory of I-slum"?

In his own letters "Ghazi" Tipu Sultan gloats about forcibly converting 50,000 Hindu prisoners from Coorg into the "Ahmedy" class of new Mohammadan converts. During the attack on Coorg he specifically instructed his soldiers to mass circumcise not just the living but even DEAD corpses of Hindu prisoners from Coorg!Image
Image
Image
Image
2000 Hindu Nāyars at Kuttippuram, Kerala were forcibly converted to Mohammadism by circumcision & compelled to eat beef by Tipu. Similarly 1000s of Hindus of Kittoor were forcibly circumcised leading to 2000 Brahmin suicides. Every Hindu house in Palghat was forcibly converted.

Image
Image
Image
Malabar (Kerala) in particular bore the brunt of genocide & savage barbarism by Tipu. In his letters he instructed his officers to forcibly convert 12,000 Hindus, many of them Namboodris. In a later letter he exulted about forcing 4 Lakh Malabar Hindus to Mohammadism in Malabar

Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
May 25
The article by @AKanisetti is pure ahistorical trash. Desecrating Hindu temples to build a mosque at Qutub complex was NOT architectural reuse but Islamic BARBARISM. "Human figures" (aka Murtis) were not just defaced but excised brutally. Kirtimukhs & elephants were mutilated. 🧵



Image
Image
Image
Image
Everywhere in the "mosque", broken ruins of Hindu & Jain temples lie scattered like garbage. Muslims deliberately wanted to show contempt for Hindu symbols this way. The name "Quwwat ul Islam" itself means "Might of Islam" - clearly indicating it was built to trample over Hindus


Image
Image
Image
Image
Kanisetti makes a disgusting claim that the mosque was built to resemble a Garbha Griha. Half the plinth of the entire mosque was built on top of a Hindu temple's basement which was enlarged by haphazardly putting together the broken remains of 27 desecrated & mutilated temples!
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
May 20
Anpadh imbecile KRK - this is what happens when you learn history from Tawaifs of Bollywood.
Actual evidence shows that every Mughal king sent MILLIONS in looted money to Mecca/Medina while draining India's wealth & ensuring horrific famines starved Lakhs of Hindus in India.
🧵
A record of exact statistics on Mughal money sent to Mecca begins with Akbar in 1576 who sent Rs. 600,000 with costly gifts like 12,000 dresses of honor & extra cash for constructing a Khanqah. The average salary for a normal Indian at this time was just 3 rupees per month! Image
In 1577, Akbar sent Rs. 500,000 Rupees & 10,000 Khilats to distribute in Mecca. Another Rs. 100,000 & costly gifts for the Sharif of Mecca. In 1578, Rs. 400,000 were sent. Meanwhile desperate starving Indians turned to cannibalism while reeling from 2 huge famines under Akbar.
Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
May 8
In Feb. 1824, Ram Mohan Roy wrote a letter "Prospects of Christianity" to Harvard's Henry Ware where he recommended bribing "outcast" Hindus to convert & of his offer to send "as many" Hindus as possible to a Christian neighbor, to convert Hindus with a salary of Rs. 8 per month.
Image
Image
The letter titled "A Letter on the Prospects of Christianity & the means of promoting its reception in India" was a reply to Unitarian Christian preacher Rev. Henry Ware of Harvard who sent him a list of questions to work out a strategy on how Hindus of India could be converted. Image
Ram Mohan Roy discussed how Hindus were refusing to convert to Christianity & made recommendations to promote it. His suggestion was to establish English schools as a sneaky way to introduce Christian ideas so that the minds of Hindus could be prepared for eventual conversion. Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 28
One of the biggest myths is that Mughals invented the miniature school of painting in India. But Akbar under whose rule miniature "Mughal" painting supposedly developed had 17 eminent court artists - out of which a whopping 13 were Hindu, due to their superior artistic skills.
🧵

Image
Image
Image
Artists like Baswan, Lal, Daswanth, Kesu, Mukund, Haribans, Jagannath, etc. from castes like Kahar, Kayastha, Chitera, Silavat & Khati, show Hindus from all castes were the creators of the best "Mughal" miniature paintings, but the credit was given to Persians in Mughal courts.
Image
Image
It is said that Mughals like Akbar appointed Persian painters to teach Hindu artisans how to paint on paper, but even before Mughals entered India in the 1520s, the Malwa school was producing intricate miniature paper paintings of scenes from Bhagwat Puran & other Hindu epics.
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(