Djokovich, Rodgers, Irving, etc. aren't just entitled rich people who are so arrogant they think they know better than science. They are betraying the two groups who enabled them to get rich--their fellow athletes & the public. These are not "off the field or court issues."
These jerks put their team mates &/or opponents at risk, officials, those who work in & around their games and they sent a terrible message to those who buy support their sports. They can't claim these are "personal" decisions and then cash in otherwise on their public personas.
The fact that the leaders of the corporate sports machines for which they work have given them license to behave this way makes them complicit too. Nearly two thousand people are dying a day in the US alone...almost all of them unvaccinated.
Since doctors, scientists and federal government leaders are speaking in unison about the value of vaccines, the only reason people are choosing the deadly path of rejecting them has to be prominent voices persuading them that's the right way.
Trump, GOP leaders, some evangelicals & quacks play a role in this. But so too do prominent figures from sports, media & the arts who are role models. Insurance companies & sporting goods manufacturers alike pay these folks millions because of the power they have to influence.
The selfish, callous, ignorant, dangerous behavior of these people should come at a high cost...because the behavior has taken an incalculable but enormous toll. Giving them special license effectively endorses them and that should stop too. Good for Australia in that respect.
If Rodgers wins the MVP in the NFL in a year when he put his teammates & opponents as well as fans at risk would send yet another repulsive message about pro football & its values. We shall see how that plays out. But this is not celebrity trivia. It is a matter of life & death.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

Jan 18,
I'm troubled by the argument I've seen to often recently from DC pundit-types, most well-meaning, that the Dems and Biden have made a mistake by embracing a left or progressive agenda and that they should shift to the center, their "true" base. This is based on a fallacy.
Everything Biden has done has been supported by either all Dems or all Dems minus one or two Dem Senators. Does this analysis mean that 48 out of 50 Senators are "left" and that Biden needs to adjust his policies to suit the other two?
Does it mean that he should be adjusting his policies to win the votes of so-called "centrist" GOPers. You know, the ones who are uniformly voting against the most basic protections for democracy & who have voted against measure after measure supported by most Americans?
Read 8 tweets
Jan 13,
Hot flash for the pearl clutching chorus of Republicans "offended" that Biden referred to proponents of Jim Crow 2.0 policies by comparing them to racists: Biden didn't go far enough. George Wallace and Bull Connor were despicable. But today's GOP is worse.
Because the objective of today's GOP is not just to disenfranchise people of color. It is to end democracy in America as we know it. They seek to effectively silence all opposition to their extreme right wing agenda and send us lurching toward authoritarianism.
They seek to place the GOP beyond the will of the people. It is their assault on voting rights but not just their assault on voting rights. It is their gerrymandering but not just their gerrymandering.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 6,
I see some on the right criticizing @VP for "comparing" 1/6 to 9/11. First, she wasn't comparing them, she was saying they were notable dates in history. Second, even if she were comparing them, it's a useful comparison. While 9/11 was horrific and should not be minimized...
...the threat posed to the U.S. by Trump, Trumpists and the far right is much greater than that ever posed by Al Qaeda. I've said it before and say it again. thedailybeast.com/the-maga-movem…
Fox didn't much like it when I said it then. So, let me try a different tactic. George W. Bush compared the two when he said, "There Is little cultural overlap between violent extremists abroad and violent extremists at home. But in their disdain for pluralism...
Read 6 tweets
Jan 6,
Powerful remarks from @POTUS & @VP. Credit to the president for the directness with which he characterized the role of his immediate predecessor. But as with Garland yesterday, the enduring measure of their performances shall not be in their words but in their actions.
It is not enough to call for defending voting rights. The speech would have been better had he directly put the weight of his office and his personal reputation behind the fight for the legislation that will soon be before the Senate.
It is not enough to say we are a nation of laws. Rather, we must see the enforcement of those laws. It is not enough to say we will defend democracy. Our leaders must say and demonstrate how they will do it.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 5,
Merrick Garland clearly understands and clearly articulated the threats American democracy faces. He framed them in his speech today in the context of the values and ideals we should hope for in our attorney general and Department of Justice.
Though his delivery was dry and revealed him again to be at his very core a jurist, his contempt was clear for those behind the 1/6 attack, behind the escalating threats of violence to American officials at every level, behind attacks on voting rights.
Indeed, his unhappiness with Supreme Court decisions (like Shelby) diluting the Voting Rights Act was palpable. It was also clear he understands the expectations of those who seek punishment not for the mob on 1/6 but for those who instigated, planned & paid for the attack.
Read 14 tweets
Jan 3,
Agree with this. Making corporations and billionaires pay taxes should be a central priority of Biden this year. So should standing up to Big Tech (including anti-trust legislation). People believe Biden cares about the average person. They need to know he will fight for them.
If I were making Biden's New Year's resolutions (after a very good first year in office), I would suggest he resolve not just to be strong but to communicate his strength--and note that the best way to communicate strength is to be strong.
Related: Every day this year, Biden needs to send the message that the November elections are not just "the midterms." They represent an existential choice for our democracy pitting Dems vs. a GOP that seeks to gut our system and disenfranchise tens of millions of Americans.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(