Share this page!

Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jan 17,, 4 tweets, 2 min read
THREADETTE: On Friday, this headline made me do a double-take.
2/ ...because this is how I saw things:
3/ So, of course, me being me, tried to find out me. But most of the coverage was surface, so I did a deep dive. @FDRLST ttps://thefederalist.com/2022/01/17/arizonas-fight-with-biden-over-mask-ban-another-chance-for-the-supreme-court-to-defend-separation-of-powers/
4/4 In fact, such a deep dive, that @dougducey could literally hand this off to his AG (or would it be Solicitor General) as they prep the legal action. thefederalist.com/2022/01/17/ari…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 14,
Augh...whenever I am all "YEA Gov. Noem" so does this again!
1/ Here are the details from when she benched herself: thefederalist.com/2021/03/22/bow…
2/ thefederalist.com/2021/03/26/the…
Read 4 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 7,
As I've said before, DH is apolitical, conservative by nature, but not knee-jerk, so his takes provide amazing insight into how most Americans see things. Tonight while watching ABC News on Jan 6 & Biden, "Augh. This is so ridiculous!" Me, like I'm hosting a focus group: 1/
2/ Me: "Wait. What's ridiculous?"
Him: "It's been a year. It happened. It's over. There's nothing to debate. It's been a year and he's (Biden) still bringing up the other guy. Nobody cares."
3/ So, while I'm playing focus-group leader, DS is taking notes for his next shtick, which comes about 5 minutes later when he's kissing up to me so I'll let him post the joke tweet beg.
Read 5 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Dec 28, 2021
@randpaul was trending so I went to what he actually tweeted (as opposed to Twitter's hot take on it). So, in other words, the truth.
Maybe I need @RandPaul to help get this "nothing to see here" Election 2020 video to trend: thefederalist.com/2021/12/21/new…
3/ Or maybe thefederalist.com/2021/12/10/exc…
Read 4 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Dec 15, 2021
THREADETTE House always said: "Everyone lies." I've always said, "everyone's biased." Now, others on Right may disagree, but I own my bias. That doesn't mean I'm going to lie, misrepresent, or mislead, and this morning, it dawned on me difference in bias from Right & Left. 1/
2/ Right's bias (in general) is limited to what it reports or focuses on and word choice, i.e. "intoned" versus "said," while the bias from the Left? Selection & word choice are there in spades, but so is creating false narratives and outrightly lying.
3/ This article (please do read because it really walks through how the false narratives are created), is a perfect illustration of the creating of a false narrative (which later leads to an outright lie). thefederalist.com/2019/05/31/law…
Read 7 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Dec 10, 2021
THREAD: So, I'm still reading the D.C. Circuit's decision in Trump v. Thompson, but think the Court made a mistake....typing as I'm thinking so walk through this with me. At 3-4 of the opinion the Court states: 1/
2/ But here's what H.R. 503 states:
3/ The purpose stated by the Court is not one of the three shown under its purpose; rather, it was the predecessor bill, H.R. 3233 which specificed that purpose.
Read 9 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Dec 7, 2021
THREAD with some friendly push back for @HansMahncke Baker is going to make a terrible witness, but for Sussmann. Baker clearly has a friendly relationship with Sussmann and an incentive to "not remember," and the hedging, confusion, etc., is going to hurt Sussmann's argument./1
2/ And I doubt Durham's case relies on Baker's testimony, other than to show Baker is at best forgetful. Rather, Durham's case likely rests on contemporaneous notes taken by someone who spoke w/ Baker RIGHT after--maybe multiple someones, since it appears he passed to Strzok,
3/ and Page. Also, remember, this is Sussmann's attorney's doing PR to promote their client's case: They included only a glimpse of the case that seemingly helps Sussmann. Now, might Durham have brought a week case? Sure, but I doubt it.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @ProfMJCleveland has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @ProfMJCleveland!

Read all threads by @ProfMJCleveland

:(