⬆ 5th or 6th highest surface temps
⬆ Warmest summer on land
⬆ Warmest year for 25 countries + 1.8 billion people
⬆ Record ocean heat
⬆ Record high GHGs
⬆ Record high sea levels
⬇ Record low glacier mass
1/18
2021 was a bit cooler than the last few years due to a moderate La Nina event. La Nina tends to result in cooler temps globally, though the global response tends to lag 3-4 months after peak conditions. Here is what global temps look like since 1970 with and without ENSO removed:
The years since 2015 – 2021 included – are quite a bit warmer than any years that came before. Barring a Pinatubo-sized eruption in the next few years, its exceedingly unlikely we will ever see a year as cool as 2014 again:
Land temperatures – where we all live – are warming 40% faster than the world as a whole (which is mostly oceans). The world's land has warmed by around 1.8C already since preindustrial times:
Areas home to 1.8 billion people saw their warmest year on record during 2021, with 25 countries – including China, South Korea, Bangladesh and Nigeria – setting all-time annual temperature records. No parts of the world set cold records for the year.
2021 saw the warmest summer (N Hem summer – June, July, August) on record for the world's land areas:
These high temperatures – and the long-term warming trend – contributed to a number of extreme events both in the summer and across the year: carbonbrief.org/guest-post-rev…
Checking in on climate model projections (from the CMIP5 models that provide future projections after 2005), temperatures are pretty well-in-line with what models think they should be:
Note that I'm not featuring a comparison with CMIP6 models; they are less well suited to a multimodel mean approach given a subset of high-sensitivity outliers. The new assessed warming ranges (which downweight too-warm models) in the AR6 only start in 2015 making comparison hard
In the lower troposhere we saw 2021 as the 6th warmest (RSS) or 8th warmest (UAH) year on record. Note that the troposhere tends to see a larger influence of La Nina and El Nino events than the surface.
The stratosphere continues to see cooling temperatures. This is a clear fingerprint of climate change from greenhouse gases, which warm the lower part of the atmosphere by trapping heat while cooling the upper atmosphere as less heat escapes.
We saw record high sea levels in 2021. Global sea levels have risen by around 0.2 metres (200mm) since 1900, and there is evidence of accelerating sea level rise over the post-1993 period when high-quality satellite altimetry data is available.
The figure below shows the change in global average glacier mass from 1950 through to the end of 2020 (2021 values are not yet available). We see consistent loss of ice mass associated with warming temperatures:
Greenhouse gas concentrations reached a new high in 2021, driven by human emissions from fossil fuels, land use and agriculture. Methane concentrations in particular have seen a sharp rise over the past decade after a plateau in the 2000s.
Arctic sea ice was at the low end of the historical (1979-2010) range for most of 2021, but saw few new all-time daily low records set outside of brief periods in February and July. The summer minimum extent was the 12th lowest since records began in the late 1970s.
Finally, we can use current conditions (and El Nino/La Nina forecasts) to estimate where temperatures will end up in 2022. Four different groups (including a new @CarbonBrief estimate) have projections for 2022, and the differ a fair bit!
Our projection and that of the @metoffice has 2022 looking pretty similar to 2021, driven down a bit by the current "double dip" La Nina event. @BerkeleyEarth has it in the middle, while @ClimateOfGavin has 2022 threatening to top 2016 and 2020 as warmest year on record. 18/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Theres been a bit of confusion lately around how the climate system response to carbon dioxide removal. While there are complexities, under realistic assumptions a ton of removal is still equal and opposite in its effects to a ton of emissions.
A thread: 1/x
When we emit a ton of CO2 into the atmosphere, a bit more than half is reabsorbed by the ocean and the biosphere today (though this may change as a warming world weakens carbon sinks). Put simply, 2 tons of CO2 emissions -> 1 ton of atmospheric accumulation.
Carbon removal (CDR) is subject to the same effects; if I remove two tons of CO2 from the atmosphere, the net removal is only one ton due to carbon cycle responses. Otherwise removal would be twice as effective as mitigation, which is not the case.
The carbon cycle has been close to equilibrium through the Holocene; we know this because we measure atmospheric CO2 concentrations in ice cores. But in the past few centuries CO2 has increased by 50%, and is now at the highest level in millions of years due to human emissions.
Starting 250 years ago, we began putting lots of carbon that was buried underground for millions of years into the atmosphere. All in all we’ve emitted nearly 2 trillion tons of CO2 from fossil fuels, which is more than the total mass of the biosphere or all human structures:
About a trillion of that has accumulated in the atmosphere, increasing CO2 concentrations to levels last seen millions of years ago. The remainder was absorbed by the biosphere and oceans. We can measure these sinks, and it’s incontrovertible that they are indeed net carbon sinks
We just published our State of the Climate Q2 update over at @CarbonBrief:
⬆️ Now a ~95% chance 2024 will be the warmest year on record.
⬆️ 13 month streak of records set between June 2023 and June 2024.
⬆️ July 22nd 2024 was the warmest day on record (in absolute terms).
⬇️ July 2024 will very likely come in below July 2023, breaking the record streak.
⬇️ The rest of 2024 is likely to be cooler than 2023 as El Nino fades and La Nina potentially develops.
⬇️ Second lowest Antarctic sea ice on record.carbonbrief.org/state-of-the-c…
The past 13 months have each set a new record, with 2024 being quite a bit warmer than 2023 (at ~1.63C above preindustrial levels) in the ERA5 dataset:
However, the margin by which records are being set has shrunk; global temperatures were setting new records by a stunning 0.3C to 0.5C in the second half of 2023, but have been breaking the prior records (set in 2016, 2020, or 2023) by only 0.1C to 0.2C this year:
Global surface temperatures from @BerkeleyEarth are now out for June. It was the warmest June on record for land, oceans, and the globe as a whole by a sizable margin (~0.14C), and came in at 1.6C above preindustrial levels. berkeleyearth.org/june-2024-temp…
This was the 13th consecutive record setting month, and the 12th month in a row above 1.5C:
The exceptional nature of recent global temperatures really stands out when we look at a 12-month moving average:
Global temperatures were extremely hot in June 2024, at just over 1.5C, beating June 2023's previous record-setting temperatures by 0.14C and coming in around 0.4C warmer than 2016 (the last major El Nino event).
Now 2024 is very likely to beat 2023 as the warmest year on record
June 2024 was so warm that – in the absence of 2023's exceptional warmth – it would have beaten any past July as the warmest absolute monthly temperature experienced by the planet in the historical record:
This plot shows how June 2024 stacked up against all the prior Junes since 1940 in the ERA5 dataset:
We’ve long talked about the carbon budget, but given that the world is on track to pass the 1.5C target in the coming decade its time to start talking about the "carbon debt".
Carbon dioxide accumulates in the atmosphere where it lasts for an extremely long time. While about half of our emissions are removed by land and ocean carbon sinks over the first century, it takes on the order of 400,000 years for nature to fully remove a ton of CO2.
But it turns out that the warming from our CO2 emissions is also extremely long lived. Even if global CO2 emissions ceased and atmospheric CO2 concentrations began to decline, the warming from those emissions would remain for millennia: pnas.org/doi/full/10.10…