🚨The House of Lords is now debating the draconian #PolicingBill at Report stage.
Rushed amendments to this Bill seek to STOP some citizens from taking part in protests altogether.
❌These unprecedented measures need to be quashed.
👮♂️Lord Coaker (@Vernon_Coaker) addresses one of the most dangerous provisions in the Bill; allowing police to limit protests based on the criteria of noise.
🪧 @greenjennyjones sets out the importance of defending everyone's right to protest, even when not sympathetic to their cause.
📣@brianpaddick warns of the dangers of giving the police too much power to decide which protests should be curtailed.
🚨Breaking🚨
Members of the House of Lords have voted to REMOVE measures from the #PolicingBill which would allow the police to limit protests where they are deemed to be too noisy AND measures that would give police more power to curtail static assemblies.
✔️It’s vital that Members of the House of Commons now accept these changes, which help safeguard our protest rights and mitigate some of the worst parts of this #PolicingBill.
💪 Overnight the House of Lords defeated a series of chilling authoritarian new amendments outright that the Government had tried to tack on to the #PolicingBill.
✊ This is a BIG WIN for human rights and civil liberties in the UK!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🗣️The internet & social media platforms are the public squares of the modern-day. They've allowed us to communicate, organise, expose corruption & build new communities.
⚠️But our online public spheres are at risk.
🎥Join our live discussion ⤵️
"Why would we want to give more power to Big Tech to decide what is misinformation and what's not?"
"The way the (Online Safety) Bill will be implemented is not yet fully explained. It's quite unclear what role Parliament will have in the drafting of the categories of harm, in holding Ofcom to account for decisions."
YouTube removed our video of civil liberties champion @DavidDavisMP's speech against domestic vaccine passports, claiming that it "contradicts expert consensus".
This ought to be a wakeup call that free speech is under severe threat online.
YouTube removed Davis’ speech, filmed at our conference fringe event, for violating its policy on “medical misinformation” but did not specify what content had breached the rules.
YouTube's claim is potentially libellous - Davis' speech was wholly accurate (and brilliant..!).
In the censored speech, @DavidDavisMP promoted vaccine benefits but warned that Covid IDs are “illiberal, demanding that we an ordinary British citizen produce our papers to do something which is normal in our daily lives.”