Did you know the @CDCgov changed the mask guidance a few months back, to call for cloth masks with clear panels for children learning to read, among other cases related to speech and language development + special needs?
Let’s talk about why none of us knew about the change.
The @CDCgov coming out to finally acknowledge that masks impede children’s reading & speech development would seem important, no?
You’d think @CDCDirector would broadcast. Or at least we’d see tweets.
Anyone heard a peep?
Raise your hand if you have a child in grades preK through 1st (the learning to read years), who is expected to mask, and hasn’t been told that a clear mask would be appropriate, given the known importance of seeing mouths in reading instruction?
Masks have become so politicized that culturally – from the @CDCgov to the media to the K–12 education discourse – we are not allowed to talk about the downsides / risks of masking children.
Even when they are in plain sight.
That’s why this update is news to all, I’m sure.
This is yet another “now it can be said” moment, in which leaders say things that practical people have been saying all along – with no accountability for taking 1.5 or more years to get there.
See also, the recent acknowledgement of weak cloth mask efficacy.
Anyway, now it can be said, y’all!
Masks impede language development and they also impede the process of kids learning how to read.
That latter part requires some explanation; this thread should help.
The recommendation is for cloth masks w/ clear panels.
The CDC now says cloth masks aren’t so effective.🤷♀️
So maybe it’s time to also acknowledge lack of solid evidence saying masks are affecting school transmission & bin them in Pk-2? nymag.com/intelligencer/…
For those of you hunting down clear masks, you may find this thread on effective/comfortable options to be helpful.
No way there is enough stock for all of America’s PK-2 teachers. That, too, rests with the @CDCgov, for burying this update.
I’ve watched as parents who advocated for school reopening – initially w/ masks (based on early assumptions RE efficacy) have received more chilly reception after later questioning evidence RE masks in schools.
I won’t soon forget that in the Great Debate between @ClaraJeffery and @NateSilver538, Jeffery was basically erasing last year’s school closure history.
Fact check: 53% of schools were closed in 1st week of Jan ‘21, and 37% hadn’t yet been opened (source: @BurbioCalendar).
I don’t even get excited anymore. I know that a) we have piles of evidence showing this already, and…
b) Anyone who didn’t get this memo already – alternately known as Team Remote Learning and Team Motivated Reasoning – will find a reason to blow off this one, too.
“But this is pre-Omicron!”
“But long COVID”
“But the immunocompromised!”
“But their immunocompromised grandparents’ neighbors!”
“But future variants!”
And no one even meeds to have evidence for any of it! Just the virtue of A Concern.
Perceptions of public education are changing… and not only because of the perceived lack of reliability / lack of child-centering due to closures.
The way the loud voices talk on here is a real problem.
And I’ll be honest, every day I log on and I have to consciously work…
… to think about the MANY educators I know personally, and how we talk/DM about kids and closures, to keep myself from getting cynical about some of the educators in my replies.
I have met thousands of Eds and seen great teaching. I count many Eds as friends and advisors.+