Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Erich Hartmann Profile picture
@erichhartmann
Jan 18, 2022 • 7 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
1/7 🧵 Okay. Here's the deal: if you are a doctor who publicly advocates for the forced masking of kids… you instantly become *personally* responsible for the damage done to our kids. To that end, these 👇 are the doctors and staff VA Chapter of the AAP: virginiapediatrics.org/staff/#directo… Image
2/7 "Executive Board" & "Delegates at Large" Image
3/7 "Chairs of Committees" Image
4/7 "Chapter Champions and Others" Image
5/7 "Advisory Chairs to the Board" Image
6/7 "Executive Director" / "Chapter Lobbyist" / "Grant Manager" ImageImage
7/7 There are 40 actual doctors associated with this VA AAP letter. Do they all *not* understand the actual data on masks? Do they *not* know that masks don't prevent COVID? Do they *not" understand the myriad, awful downsides to masks?

Won't some intrepid journalist ask them?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Erich Hartmann

Erich Hartmann Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @erichhartmann

Erich Hartmann Profile picture
Oct 27
It's alarming to see Jake Tapper lose his composure like this. He's professional for about the first 2 minutes, but then completely disintegrates into a frothing, lashing mess. JD Vance knows his stuff, and comes across as extremely normal and reasonable here.
Why is Jake Tapper arguing like this? What does misrepresenting the fact accomplish? Is he a Harris surrogate? Does he think that Vance is just gonna sit back and let this stuff slide? Did he not do his homework?

Tapper defends the Russia Hoax. Full throated. Wow.
Jake Tapper acts like he's personally offended. Why?
Read 4 tweets
Erich Hartmann Profile picture
Jun 26
Dear lawyers arguing in front of SCOTUS:

The justices are *not* informed. They clearly had not read the evidence/case. Their questions in MISSOURI were naive, and assumed the gov did this to "protect".

Our goddamn country is at stake. You must do better in oral arguments! 😡
The back-and-forth in the MISSOURI oral was shocking. SCOTUS was clearly unfamiliar with the *core* issues, the history, the details. Yet… the lawyers assumed they were up to speed, and hadn't war-gamed a scenario where they weren't. An extremely foreseeable scenario.
All you have to do is remember when Sotomayor claimed there were "hundreds of thousands of kids in the ICU with 'covid'!" and went unchallenged.

LAWYERS: YOU CANNOT ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN.

You must be prepared to correct the factual record!
Read 7 tweets
Erich Hartmann Profile picture
Jan 18
"Legal Chaos"… yep. Once Chevron is struck down the entire Federal Administrative State will be left with a mere fraction of their current scope. It was never Constitutional for the Legislative Branch to OUTSOURCE their job to bureaucrats. Good riddance to bad governance.
The Federal government was never supposed to do as much as they currently do. The size and scope is unconstitutional. Period.

The 2 worst SCOTUS decisions were Chevron and Wickard. As long as these abominations persist, our lives will continue to get worse.
The left's arguments against overturning Chevron are "lt will be messy, thousands of bureaucrats will be fired, who will 'interpret' congress' dictates!?"

A classic case of burying the lede: it's simply illegal for the Executive branch to do 80% of what they currently do. Sry.
Read 9 tweets
Erich Hartmann Profile picture
Jun 7, 2023
The other day I had a very illuminating interaction with some woke boomer protesters at an event I was attending w/ my kid, and here's how it went down:

🧵1/6
The attendees were quite diverse in terms of age, race and (assumed) income %-wise it was in-line w/ our population.

There were 8 protesters out front, they were all in their 60’s, white, & carrying hand-made signs that read:

“REPUBLICANS BAN BOOKS!”

2/6
As we were alking by I smiled, so they came up to us:

ME: “Wow! Banning books, huh?”

THEM “Yes! Haven’t you heard?!”

ME “No! That sounds crazy!”

THEM “Yeah, they’re banning books, it is crazy!”

ME “Which books are they banning?”

THEM “THEY’RE BANNING BOOKS!”

3/6
Read 6 tweets
Erich Hartmann Profile picture
Apr 5, 2023
In Spring 2020, during peak COVID tyranny and public health overreach, there was one bright spot for liberty, freedom and sanity. That bright spot was the Wisconsin Supreme Court:

reuters.com/article/us-hea…
In Spring 2020 power mad bureaucrats across country ignored our Constitution & violating our basic human rights by issuing “public health” orders that were prima facie 100% illegal. And they did this by claiming… “emergency!” Image
Once our tyrannical administrative overlords began abusing their COVID “emergency” powers a lot of us started asking “WHERE ARE OUR COURTS?!” Unfortunately our courts were MIA (or worse), with one notable exception: the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

thehill.com/policy/healthc…
Read 12 tweets
Erich Hartmann Profile picture
Feb 9, 2023
This 4,000 character tweet thing is just awful.

This is Twitter, not Reddit with one global sub. The POINT of this platform is short, constrained statements. Not long winded wordy bullshit.

It's such a shame that @elonmusk doesn't understand the core DNA of this platform.
@elonmusk Perhaps the greatest misconception in creativity is that "no rules" is the best brief.

Some of the greatest works in history have come from media constraints: the 3.5 minute hit song, the 100 minute feature film, the 30 second commercial.
Twitter started out w 160 characters, then grew to 220 (which was a good call).

The tweet limit is not only a little challenge, it's pleasant to the eye for the reader. It's inviting.

220 character tweets allow us to experience MORE thoughts & opinions.

"Read more…" um, no.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(