I'm still making my way through all 35 issues of Bantha Tracks. #BanthaTracks19 brings us an interview with the great makeup artist, sculptor, and Yoda model Stuart Freeborn!
Freeborn here calls Greedo one of his favorite creature designs, and describes the mask's origin as a "Pea-Man" for a UK commercial. The "mohawk of quills" was a necessary addition to cover the seam that he had to cut because the plastic had stiffened up!
Freeborn worked on 2001, and says the opening sequence featured apes instead of Neanderthals for reasons of modesty. That was his first creature work, and the ape mouth mechanism was reused for Chewie (as well as getting him the gig!).
Freeborn was put in the hospital during the production of Star Wars by a toxic material he was using for creature design, opening the door for Rick Baker to step in and finish the job. Creature work is more dangerous than I expected (less so now, I hope).
I've heard Yoda described as a frog before, but this is the first time I've seen someone suggest that his head bumps are meant to be vestigial scales from an aquatic ancestor. I guess Freeborn would know!
At the time of the interview he was just about to head over to the States for Ewok work. The Ewok actors weren't available for fittings in England, so their costumes had to be made from measurements.
The dear departed Peter Mayhew wasn't scheduled for an interview, but he was kind enough to take some time with the Fan Club crew while they were visiting Elstree.
Big news: Revenge of the Jedi is now officially Return of the Jedi! George claims that was always the real title, and "Revenge" was just a working title for Jedi. Truth, or patented George Lucas revisionist history? 🧐 (I don't remember lobby posters saying "Blue Harvest".)
A cartoon from an Australian fan, with a very recognizable George behind the box of artificial snow.
Another potentially achievable collectible for the modern fan? "One of the most exquisite patches ever made."
Rev—ReTURN of the Jedi is just three months away, and Maureen Garrett is three exclamation marks' worth of all-caps excited. (Check out that cutie-pie dewback!) The Force is with us!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's a decades-old tendency in Star Wars fandom to minimize the sensitive/naïve/childlike/goofy parts of Star Wars (Tarzan yell, Ewoks, Jar Jar, Chewie's fear), to label them departures from what some think Star Wars "really" is (badass). It's always been both.
As we aged out of the ideal target audience for Star Wars (under 13), we (mostly dudes) became suspicious of the soft parts of Star Wars, and either mocked them or segregated them in their own box — okay at the time, but no more of that please. More Boba Fett, implacable killer!
But it's all part of the text. It's all on the same level (all "canon"), whether you like it or not. It's not (just) a joke that Malakili loved and bonded with his rancor; it's part of Star Wars. If a writer chooses to focus on it, that's just as Star Wars as Vader in Rogue One.
This meme got (rightfully) dunked on on Star Wars Twitter a few days ago, but it taps into something that's been rolling around in my head for a while: the transition from pulp heroes to modern heroes.
The pulp heroes of the serials that inspired Star Wars start out heroic and don't change much over the course of their stories. We don't see Flash Gordon or the Lone Ranger learning to be heroes. George Reeves' Superman and pre-Craig James Bond start and end as paragons.
The pleasure in these stories comes from watching an ultracompetent hero go through their paces; we don't want to see them learn or stumble, we want to see them steadily overcome the odds with style and grace. It's satisfying, though sometimes dismissed as juvenile or simple.
Hats off to the folks who think Rey is a Mary Sue power fantasy and somehow don’t think the EU was.
(And this has been bugging me since I posted that screenshot: EXPANDED Universe. It’s the EXPANDED Universe. Yeesh.)
If you haven’t been following me for a while, you might be interested in this thread, which goes a little deeper into my thoughts about the EU and TLJ:
A long Twitter chat with someone who didn’t like TLJ helped to crystallize one complaint I’ve heard a lot, which is that Rey didn’t receive “training.” I don’t think that’s really the complaint, because Luke’s training was scanty at best; I think Rey breaks the Hero’s Journey.
Probably this has been said elsewhere by others, but it was the first time it occurred to me. The typical hero’s journey has the hero receiving a call to adventure (and temporarily rejecting it) before meeting their mentor and receiving the talisman they’ll need on their quest.
For Luke, that’s obviously Obi-Wan, who gives him his magic sword, and more generally awakens him to his superpowers. Luke rejects the call until his family is killed, then goes off on his quest. By the book.
Posting this again because people keep bringing it up: “that line” is older than Empire.
This has kicked off a little, and as a result I've gotten some responses along the line of "Okay great, but Rose's line was still stupid." I can tell you: not only was it not stupid, it's been a significant theme for all of Star Wars, and I've got the receipts. A THREAD.
The idea that your actions can be corrupted by your motivation isn't a new concept in Star Wars. Hate corrupts. Anger corrupts. That's Jedi 101. If you are acting from a place of anger and hate, you're being reckless, with your own life and with others'. It colors every decision.