🧵

@PatrickGormanMP published an abhorrent, self-serving piece claiming Labor leads a war on poverty.

Labor aren't "for the poor" & they haven’t been in my lifetime. This is designed to prime people to think there's a small cohort of ppl in rare circumstances living in poverty.
I was stunned but not surprised to read Gorman's article, which is mostly a grab bag of ALP policies that aren't related to poverty. It doesn't mention unemployment or JobSeeker once.

Below is some of what I felt upon it 👇

ty @bkjabour for publishing it
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
This table shows the gap between poverty line & unemployment payments growing faster under the ALP than Coalition

Red/orange/green columns are the rate as % of HPL. Blue & re for which party was in gov & how much more or less below the poverty line the payment was for that time Screencap of spreadsheet showing changes in the Henderson po
His piece is dangerous.

It erases government agency in the active creation of poverty. It insidiously perpetuates harmful "dole bludger" myths.

It's the kind of thing that fuels stigma for unemployed people, increases dehumanisation & abuse.

I've highlighted the worst of it. Photo of the newspaper article by Labor MP Patrick Gorman. T
Right now we're being inundated with distress calls from our community. Messages like these cause material harm. They say to millions of us: you don’t matter. Some ppl deserve to get out of poverty, but not you. It can push vulnerable ppl over the self-harm threshold.
Things are so grim. I cried reading back over my own words. Fucking hell.

If this is a war on poverty I feel like a nurse on the battlefield rushing from one critically injured casualty to the next.

Give us some relief from your sanctimonious bullshit while we try to survive.
*upon READING it, ffs

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with kristin #BTPM (she/her)

kristin #BTPM (she/her) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kristin8X

Jan 13
🧵 #BTPM

Hi folks, someone shared a story with us today that spells out perfectly the absolute WORK of being unemployed, even in a pandemic.

They've kindly agreed to let me share it. It shows how folks lose days and days managing dumb requirements just to TRY and stay safe.
Note: this is about a DES provider. That's the DISABILITY employment service.

Yesterday this (un)employment provider insisted that the person attend an IN PERSON appointment in a few days' time, despite spiralling COVID cases.

A familiar story, we know.
This person rightly wants to keep themselves safe and started to figure out how to avoid doing a face-to-face appointment.

Here's absurd/byzantine process they needed to do ... just so they could stay home IN A PANDEMIC 👇
Read 28 tweets
Jan 7
Let's break down how absurd this is.

Jeremy currently lives in a very small town near the border of 2 "employment regions" – arbitrary boundaries made by the gov.

He's just inside the Bendigo ER, moving to Ballarat ER. From a town of ~4k ppl to a city of more than 100,000.
The reason this will have been flagged in the system is because the Bendigo and Ballarat *employment regions* – meaningless boundaries – have different unemployment rates.

Bendigo ER has an unemployment rate of 4.3% and 7500 people in jobactive. Ballarat is 4% and 6800.
Bendigo ER working age pop is 102k ppl. Ballarat: 104k.

These places. Are basically. The same.

He's moving from a town of 4k ppl, so what difference does it make to his prospects whether he moves an hr in one direction or an hr in the other?

None. They just want to punish him.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 7
To be extremely clear: the gov restricts freedom of movement for ppl on JS

1 of the many problems w the MOs bill they tried & failed to force through: the dept couldn't answer my q about how new 'incentives' to relocate interact w rules that *prevent* ppl choosing where to live.
There are obviously many problems with rules that punish people for moving.

First and foremost: it is a human rights violation.

2nd: People are prevented from moving somewhere where it might be easier to survive on the JS pittance.

3rd: It traps people in unsafe situations.
4th: There are many reasons poor ppl go to the GREAT EXPENSE of moving. Such as accessing healthcare or being closer to family/other supports that help them survive on JobSeeker.

5th: Long-term unemployed ppl are actively prevented from gaining skills by perverse MO requirements
Read 7 tweets
Jan 6
This story essentially says in some businesses up to ½ the staff are off for HEALTH & SAFETY REASONS, the gov is saying they'll REMOVE HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS & the peak union body says PLS GIVE SMALL BUSINESSES free tests.
Not only is that *not* who your constituency is supposed to be @unionsaustralia, but the lowering of ambitions is astounding. Just a few days ago weren't you on the 'free RATs for ALL' bandwagon?

Grow a fucking spine and fight for something meaningful 👇
@unionsaustralia Oh and I dunno maybe make your 2nd priority (1st being getting back 2020 changes to social security that meant people could access it quickly and have an adequate payment) could be MAKE A REAL FUCKING RUCKUS ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE PM WANTS TO REMOVE HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS
Read 4 tweets
May 18, 2021
I had so many things to say and there was never going to be enough time to cover all my thoughts and feelings about #Budget2021.

I’ll be doing a thread here shortly with everything I didn’t get to get to at the @ACOSS budget event.
There was only one way to feel about the bullshit we heard from @MichaelSukkarMP + @JEChalmers: despairing. They’re detached from reality.

We can’t trust the gov to care for vulnerable people + the Labor party has given us no hope that they will either. They are NOT on our side.
This IS an austerity budget. Constantly repeating the gov’s line that they’re spending big + that they’ve “increased” payments is gaslighting every poor + vulnerable person in this country. It’s a lie.

Ppl on JobSeeker are $15 FURTHER BELOW the poverty line than before COVID.
Read 40 tweets
May 12, 2021
ok I’m fiiinally sitting down to read the budget papers the whole way through Image
Please reward my efforts by coming to our NON-BORING budget reply reply tomorrow night

Fuck #TheirBudget, it’s our lives that matter

RSVP here (everything is free unless you want to pay): eventbrite.com.au/e/forum-their-…
Ok so we know the “commercial in confidence” argument is the bullshit excuse they use to hide how much money they’re burning on #CashlessDebitCard “trials”, but how, HOW, can they pretend AAT cases are CIC? Somebody help me out here. #BTPM #Budget2021 @aimnau Image
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(