Let me briefly explain the ebullient mood of Boris Johnson today at PMQs, and his shambling fearful response with @BethRigby yesterday. It's because in the House of Commons, no MP can be accused of lying. So he feels safe to lie freely. 1/5 theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
But in an interview with a journalist, they can say, you're lying PM, aren't you? The public can see he's lying. Yet in the Commons, when MPs can't do that, the public mistakenly think because he isn't challenged, he's done nothing wrong. 2/5 news.sky.com/story/boris-jo…
This stupid rule that bans any MP from calling out another MP for lying or misleading the House, is a charter for pathological liars like Boris Johnson. They can play out this charade without fear of challenge.
3/5
If it was fine to call out another MP for lying, Johnson wouldn't dare tell bare-faced lies like he does now. The whole idea that an MP is incapable of lying, and must have made a mistake is a stupid contrivance to protect liars.
4/5
I'm pretty sure a very large proportion of the public don't know about this rule, or at least forget it when this charade is being played out
5/5
I should have added an extra point. To prove someone is lying is almost impossible, because for something to be a lie, you have to prove that they know they are not telling the truth, which is almost impossible. However, you can say it's very likely they are lying.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'd like to use this point to illustrate why the claim that all people are responsible for the climate and ecological emergency, through their consumption, behaviour and the governments they elect, is a monstrous false argument and misrepresentation of the facts.
1/🧵
As rightly noted, those without a sympathetic employer (and most aren't) or wealth i.e. most of the population, have to keep in the rat race driving the crisis, just to keep their heads above water. This includes voting for a government most likely to keep them in work.
2/
This is not just about time off to protest. It's about the ability to make alterations to your lifestyle, or the government you vote for, because most are just trying to keep their head above water.
3/
Once more I ask why aren't Boris Johnson and others being investigation for perverting the course of justice by the @metpoliceuk, for lying about these social gatherings in Downing Street? 1/
Former cabinet minister Chris Huhne was convicted of perverting the course of justice, and given an 8 month prison sentence for simply lying to avoid a speeding ticket, and getting his then wife to say she was driving at the time, 10 years earlier. 2/ independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
This proves no matter how trivial the original offence is, if you lie to avoid conviction you are guilty of perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, and nearly always results in a prison sentence.
3/
Lord Kerslake: ‘You cannot have a situation where a civil servant will make a pronouncement that could end the office of a prime minister. The consequence is that Sue Gray will inevitably have to stop short of that.’ theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
"Downing Street was spinning the report as a “get out of jail” card because officials were confident there would be no finding of the prime minister breaching lockdown laws, since the matter was not in the inquiry’s remit."
"Powell [Jonathan] said he had high regard for Gray, but it was “totally inappropriate” for the inquiry to be conducted by a civil servant reporting to the prime minister. ..."
Please see this video of @jrockstrom's presentation at COP26 summing up the figures. He says to keep within the 1.5C carbon budget that the richest 1% need to reduce their emissions by a factor of 30. The video starts at that point.🧵 1/
What @jrockstrom is saying, and he is likely the world's leading expert on this aspect of the problem, is only massive cuts to consumption and emissions, by the richest people in the world, can keep us within the 1.5C carbon budget. This is about climate equity.
2/
This is genuinely about solutions. One important aspect of any realistic solution is that the extravagant consumption and emissions of a tiny proportion of the richest people in society, just have to be cut.
3/
Whilst I think it's important that Boris Johnson is held responsible for the scandals, I think it's also important to remember this is the Tory's fault generally. Rishi Sunak also lives in Downing Street, and therefore must have been aware of the parties there etc. 🧵
1/6
The reason I mention this, is that the Tories might just try replacing Johnson with Rishi Sunak, or another cabinet minister, and saying that's it, the scandals have been dealt with. Whereas none of what Johnson has done could have happened without their full complicity.
2/6
Not only the the cabinet, but the vast majority of the Conservative Party have had far more insight and knowledge of these scandals and corruption than anyone else. They have knowingly covered up for Johnson, and have willingly supported him.
3/6
You must watch this. I endorse everything @GeorgeMonbiot says here, every word. This is my own conclusions having spent 50+ years of thinking very deeply about this. 🧵 1/8
It took me a long time to fully understand this. When I personally studied systems theory, dynamical systems theory, after I completed my ecology degree, everything clicked into place. 3/8 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamical…