I don't know that any other facet of covid has been more politicized and less fact-based than natural immunity, and the vast majority of it is reactive because god forbid you give the vax skeptical any ammo, even if they happen to be right about something.
Yeah 800,000 people died, but at least 100 million Americans had gotten covid in 2020 alone. So your 800,000 sounds large, but it's way less than 1% of the total number of Americans who got covid.
Can you actually read? How is that remotely relevant to this discussion? Start a blog if you want to cry about the death toll. Refuting the idea of natural immunity by mentioning that less than 1% died of it makes zero sense.
The word is "fewer" and you invented an enemy in your head and got mad that your enemy existed. You just decided that I was arguing that vaccines are dangerous because it's your only way to try and not look like a fool right now.
No, that is what you decided I'm arguing because you can't address my argument, which is that ANY efficacy of natural immunity is dismissed as an anti-vaxxer conspiracy - something YOU ARE LITERALLY DOING RIGHT NOW.
I want you to specifically show me where the word "instead" was used anywhere in this discussion. If you can't, I expect you to come back here and apologize for being wrong.
All this person is doing is showing that the resistance to discussing natural immunity is motivated by the policy fear that people will opt to get covid instead of vaccinated. Just more Noble Lies meant to prevent potentially undesirable behavioral outcomes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am a firm believer in the philosophy of tone matching, and I generally feel fine being nasty to someone if they were being nasty. This was a particularly egregious example and so I don't think that by making a couple of munchkin jokes I stepped over some line.
Is this a universal? No. Am I entirely consistent with this? No. But nastiness is an emotional reaction, not a cerebral one. None of us are perfect. Reich was galactically gross but instead of just cursing him out I went for the jokes. Trust me, it was the nicer option.
I think someone's physicality is fair game when the issue is some sort of physical scenario (in this case, a bunch of men backhanding a woman). If someone threatens to punch you, him being a waif becomes relevant.
Is there a name for the reverse version of Motte and Bailey? Like when you argue a defensible position but then are expected by the other party to defend its more extreme and indefensible version by extension?
I get that it's basically a strawman, but that's too vague for this very specific phenomenon.
No the scenario I'm describing is that I said I think masks in schools being optional is considerate, someone was like "well so should all childhood vaccines be optional too? Since you're so committed to being considerate..."
You're being dishonest, James. Health officials specifically talking about BLM protests was a big story and involved hundreds of professionals in the field.
I got a stomach bug once that drove my fever so high it fucked up my kidneys and I spent a week in the hospital. I'm sorry you felt like shit, but what you're describing is a mild illness.
We're not talking about how bad it makes you feel. We're talking about "mild" in the sense that there are many things that we don't need to continue doing because of it.
J.K. Rowling definitely did location scouting for a movie she didn't work on and singlehandedly chose the Australian High Commission building this was filmed in, which has 8 pointed stars that are definitely not Stars of David. Other than that, good Judaisming, bub.