There's a dynamic in press coverage wherein Republican politicians' racism, authoritarianism, obstructionism, & lack of policy vision are treated as normal phenomena, but, conversely, Republican voters are viewed as exotic creatures straight out of a David Attenborough film.
The Republicans' abjectly anti-democratic behavior is accepted as a baseline, rather than abnormal & worthy of intense inquiry, but Republican voters' *loyalty* to this abnormal behavior is worthy of extreme curiosity. So we get a lot of "Trump voters still love Trump" stories.
Meanwhile, Democratic politicians are messy for attempting to participate in democracy. Democratic voters, in contrast, are treated as bores. The press largely ignores them. What's interesting, after all, in being committed to a party that's actually trying to be democratic?
This creates a situation where the GOP's bad behavior gets obscured, but *support* for their behavior is entrenched in the public's mind. Democrats' pro-democratic behavior gets derided & voters' support for this behavior is ignored. No "Biden voters still love Biden" articles.
It's important to recognize these asymmetries. We know from psychology that hearing about a person or party's popularity will either entrench that popularity or increase it. Hearing about a person or party's unpopularity has the same effect, basically creating a doom spiral.
We're in a bad spot when anti-democratic behavior is treated as normal, but support for that behavior is treated as ~fascinating~. This situation is rendered worse when pro-democratic behavior is treated as hopelessly messy & support for this behavior is treated as a snooze fest.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
