The amount (and type) of coverage antisemitism receives in much of the US media depends *entirely* on the perpetrator and not the victims. Even in our own story we are relegated to pawns in a political narrative, complete afterthoughts.
At the same time we have to be careful what we wish for. I remember expressing my frustration at the left-of-center blackout on antisemitism and then seeing articles like this and thinking maybe the silence is the least-bad option here
I mean just look at the Sharpton thing. We want left-leaning pubs and networks to talk about antisemitism, so MSNBC brings on the guy who led an actual pogrom.
I guess what we should start with is, rather, that every single major left-leaning publication and network--every single one--needs someone on staff who doesn't see antisemitism through a partisan lens. None has the personnel to responsibly talk about antisemitism.
If you want to understand something you have to make an effort to do so. At least NYT is honest: Bari brought up antisemitism and was pushed out. NYT made the point clearly it does not care. Other pubs pretend, then do nothing about it.
When I tweeted and wrote about this in Commentary, ppl on here were shocked. This isn't investigative journalism I just watched on TV what our members of Congress said on the House floor! And ppl had no idea! You have to try to *not* cover this stuff
And btw when AOC and the rest of the Squad (and Squad wannabes) did this, it was during a widespread outbreak in anti-Jewish violence coast to coast. And they used that time to hold an hour-long blood libel-palooza on the House floor. And... crickets.
Anybody ask Cori Bush why she connected Israel with Ferguson and called it "Jerusalem, Palestine"? No, no one's curious, huh. Anyway, brief review in here of the various bonkers things they all said that day: commentary.org/articles/seth-…
In sum, no it is not surprising that the enlightened West immediately lost interest in a shul taken hostage. It would be strange if they didn't.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
He's right about this part: schools are sitting on gobs of rescue cash. Spend it! Fix it!
Policy aside, this tone is much better, much more appropriate to the situation.
One of the reasons Biden stood out in the primaries was because he kept *not* freaking out. He kept *not* living on twitter's outrage cycles. He rarely took bait. He was just calmer. Voters interpret that as faith that the ship isn't about to capsize.
Good excuse to repost the greatest Friedman takedown ever, Matt Taibbi's NYPress essay Flathead. "He has an anti-ear, and it's absolutely infallible; he is a Joyce or a Flaubert in reverse, incapable of rendering even the smallest details without genius." delong.typepad.com/egregious_mode…
""Let me... share with you some of the encounters that led me to conclude that the world is no longer round," he says. He will literally travel backward in time, against the current of human knowledge."
"Friedman is a person who not only speaks in malapropisms, he also hears malapropisms. Told level; heard flat. This is the intellectual version of Far Out Space Nuts, when NASA repairman Bob Denver sets a whole sitcom in motion by pressing "launch" instead of "lunch"."
This is the explicit and intended end result of the BDS movement and the left's attempt to single out Israel: companies stop taking Jewish clients jta.org/2022/01/11/ny/…
"Anti-Zionism" isn't a thing. If you're just criticizing a state, that's called criticism, and if you support the dismantling and destruction of the Jewish homeland, that's genocidal antisemitism. "Anti-Zionism" stopped being a thing before most of these activists were born.
"Anti-Zionism" doesn't exist. It is merely the term for antisemitism that cowards prefer. Time to grow up.
He's also getting dragged for calling it terrorism but he's right there too. Ppl in that mob committed political violence specifically intended as such. No reason those individuals should get a pass from the label.
Terrorism doesn't require planning and organization, it's an act plus intent. (To respond to some of the objections I'm getting.) A few ppl can be said to have crossed that line without it meaning the entire protest on Jan. 6 was in the same category.
I think part of the problem is that there's so much generalization that ppl are defensive (understandably) about the whole Jan. 6 contingent getting tagged with the same label. But I think Cruz is referring to a tiny minority, not saying everyone protesting was a terrorist.
These are the children's books Facebook bans--after hearing from commenters who said to literally burn the books: bios of Ronald Reagan, John Wayne, Margaret Thatcher, Thomas Sowell, etc.
In case you were wondering why Bethany's work is so important.
We read the children's bio of Sonia Sotomayor to our kids, but FB bans the children's bio of Amy Coney Barrett. Our kids are going to grow up learning important lessons from figures of all politics, races, ethnicities, religions, etc. The new cultural commissars abhor it.
When ppl ask, we rave about these other children's books series--my kids worship folks like Brad Meltzer. I've tweeted repeatedly how such books have facilitated real and meaningful conversations about history with my kids. Heroes of Liberty is about adding value to value.