I'm not a voice piece for anyone, and you slander me by saying so. I hate trophy hunting and I'm repulsed by the people who do it. But the evidence shows powerfully that, when well-regulated, it creates a powerful incentive for the conservation of both species and habitats.
If you disagree, please read this paper. There's a wealth of evidence showing that regulated trophy hunting, disgusting as I find it, has brought wildlife and habitats back from the brink, while generating enthusiasm and income among local people. iucn.org/sites/dev/file…
The world does not divide up as neatly as we might wish.
Respect people with consistent principles.
But beware of people with consistent facts.
Here's a letter from African community leaders, pointing out that, because people in rich nations (quite understandably) respond emotionally to the revolting photos of egomaniacs posing with dead animals, they are not seeing the bigger picture. resourceafrica.net/open-letter-ce…
Please listen to them. They understand this issue in ways that many of those who have been wading in do not.
With thanks and respect to Alex Morss and @AmyDickman4, who persuaded me that I was wrong on this issue. They have gained nothing from taking this stand, other than attacks and abuse. Alex has been driven off Twitter by it.
Please listen before you shout. theguardian.com/environment/20…
I've lost 1,000 followers overnight for taking this position.
That pains me.
It feels weird to take a hit for an industry I detest.
But it won't stop me from following the evidence, however uncomfortable it may be.
I understand the reaction. I truly hate the pictures of rich men with big egos and small body parts posing with the beautiful animals they have killed. It speaks well of people that they empathise with those animals. But we would otherwise have lost entire populations of them.
I strongly object to being compared by the actor @PeterEgan6 to Jimmy Savile, because I've been persuaded by compelling evidence that my previous stance on this issue was wrong.
We should be prepared to change our minds. We shouldn't be abused for doing so
But I completely agree that there SHOULD be a better way. Rich nations SHOULD help poorer ones with serious money and incentives to protect endangered wildlife. But they aren't. Far from it. Removing a powerful incentive before others are in place will cause a wildlife disaster.
One aspect I find hard to understand:
People who campaign against trophy hunting are strongly motivated by empathy. I understand and respect this.
But some of them treat humans with whom they disagree with no empathy at all.
And appear to love the hue and cry of a Twitter hunt.
On the other hand, thank you to those who have engaged respectfully, even when they disagree. And love to all of you, regardless of the things you might have said. Without love we have nothing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a truly shocking story: strong evidence of systematic dumping of used fishing gear by Spanish and French boats in the UK's seas, and its devastating impact on marine life.
This isn't about nationalism though - we should all be horrified by it. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Every time the boats dock they take on miles of new net. When they return to port after 4-6 weeks at sea, they dispose of ... nothing. No used gear, no rubbish. Where does it go?
This is what local trawlers are now dredging up on every trip. Massive bundles of dumped nets.
These "ghost nets" are full of the animals they catch as they drift through the sea. I will spare you the pictures of the dead seals I've been sent: they are extremely distressing. But what follows are snapshots of the indiscriminate slaughter happening around our coasts.
I would dearly love to be able to come out in unequivocal support of the BBC, as it comes under government attack.
But while its dramas and a few of its documentaries are excellent, its news and current affairs are such a disaster zone that I find this very hard.
Thread/
What I see and hear is a massive platform for every far-right blowhard who can generate some noise on social media, while almost everyone to the left of Keir Starmer is persona non grata.
I see environmental and social activists being effectively blacklisted as "extremists".
I see a perennial failure to tell the difference between balance and impartiality, exemplified by the senior executive last week who said that if enough people believe the Earth is flat, he will give them a platform. What this means is that professional liars get a free pass.
Let's remember where all this came from.
The media built Boris Johnson: he is its Frankenstien's monster, sewn together from laughter and lies.
It built Nigel Farage.
It built Jacob Rees-Mogg.
And the other killer clowns tearing this country apart.
Then it gave these clowns a massive platform, the platform it reserves for the most odious, entitled and feckless people to be found in this nation.
Make us laugh, make us cry, but above all make a noise.
Because that's ratings. And ratings is power.
To hell with the consequences
You think I'm talking about the billionaire press?
Yes I am.
But I'm also talking about the BBC, whose role is more insidious and more powerful, because, for some reason, people still trust it.
Impartiality? Balance?
Forget it. Give us outrage. Give us shock. Give us eyeballs.
What’s unfolding here and now in the UK is almost unbelievable. But it's real. And it includes an attempt to criminalise an entire ethnic group. It's as if the 20th Century never happened. We urgently need to wake up to this.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
There’s an arrogant, unfounded belief that it couldn’t happen here: after all, we’re British. Tory MPs and Lords chunter about the “British sense of fair play”. OK, so where is it? When do they propose to exercise it?
The thing is, this swift and horrifying shift towards authoritarianism will continue even if Johnson is toppled this week. In fact, it might even accelerate, as the ascendant force in the parliamentary Conservative Party is the ERG/CRG extremists.
The Cold War was a clash between two extreme ideologies: the extreme collectivism of the USSR and the extreme individualism of the USA and its satellites. Both belief systems were pointed towards collapse.
Thread/
When the Soviet Union collapsed, the Western powers believed their system had been vindicated. It hadn’t. It’s just that the other one fell first.
The gathering chaos in the US, which some people believe is leading towards fascism, civil war or both, is driven by the impossible expectations raised by extreme individualism: everyone can have everything, regardless of the interests of anyone else.
Johnson obtains £58k of favours while offering govt support for the donor's project. Then lies about it.
The regulator, Lord Geidt, decides that this blatant corruption did not break the ministerial code.
Lord Geidt was appointed by Boris Johnson.
We need a formal constitution.
I've long seen the government appointment system as fundamentally corrupt. It's as if a defendant in a criminal trial were allowed to choose the judge and jury from among his mates, decide which charges he should be tried on, and choose how the trial should be conducted.
It's the same with public inquiries: the govt decides who will preside over investigations into its own malfeasance, and what the scope should be.
Lord Geidt and other such figures are "independent" of the government in the sense that my right hand is independent of my left hand.