The Cold War was a clash between two extreme ideologies: the extreme collectivism of the USSR and the extreme individualism of the USA and its satellites. Both belief systems were pointed towards collapse.
Thread/
When the Soviet Union collapsed, the Western powers believed their system had been vindicated. It hadn’t. It’s just that the other one fell first.
The gathering chaos in the US, which some people believe is leading towards fascism, civil war or both, is driven by the impossible expectations raised by extreme individualism: everyone can have everything, regardless of the interests of anyone else.
Some people believe this so strongly that the word “freedom” has come to mean freedom from any constraint whatsoever: they no longer feel they owe any obligation of decency, kindness or care to others.
The ideological pillars of this belief – such as Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and Friedrich Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty – are as mad as any Soviet tract. I mean properly batshit crazy. Those who seek to live by them demand conditions that the real world cannot provide.
Almost as bonkers are the much older tracts that these books draw on, such as John Locke's Second Treatise and Bernard Mandeville's The Fable of the Bees. Their claims and justifications fall apart immediately. Yet we have built on this quicksand.
It is the chasm between theory and practice that systems collapse into. Right now we are watching the US system (with the UK’s not far behind) beginning to topple into this chasm.
Chaos, conflict and collapse in the US now seem entirely plausible. Resolution, peace and stability look ever less likely. When people fervently believe the impossible, there tends to be no peaceful way out. You can’t negotiate with them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

7 Jan
Johnson obtains £58k of favours while offering govt support for the donor's project. Then lies about it.
The regulator, Lord Geidt, decides that this blatant corruption did not break the ministerial code.
Lord Geidt was appointed by Boris Johnson.
We need a formal constitution.
I've long seen the government appointment system as fundamentally corrupt. It's as if a defendant in a criminal trial were allowed to choose the judge and jury from among his mates, decide which charges he should be tried on, and choose how the trial should be conducted.
It's the same with public inquiries: the govt decides who will preside over investigations into its own malfeasance, and what the scope should be.
Lord Geidt and other such figures are "independent" of the government in the sense that my right hand is independent of my left hand.
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
To allow gamekeepers to kill crows and jackdaws to "protect" pheasants and partridges, the pheasants and partridges are classed as livestock. But you aren't allowed to shoot livestock for sport, so when pheasants and partridges are being shot, they're classed as wildlife.
Thread/
But you aren't allowed to round up wild animals at the end of the shooting season, and trap them in enclosures, so when the survivors are being rounded up, they become livestock again.
But if a pheasant flies into a car during the roundup, and causes a crash, you're not legally liable, because, for this purpose, it becomes wildlife again.
Read 11 tweets
3 Jan
Because this article came out on Christmas Eve, and seems unbelievable, the outrageous things it reveals have been a bit buried. So I’m giving it a new push. With the government’s help, key sectors of the economy are being handed over to organised crime. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
My guess is that there are now upwards of a million people in the UK working in organised criminal networks, with almost no fear of prosecution, facilitated by successive governments' wildly irresponsible deregulation. This is a fantastically hazardous situation.
As crime networks embed themselves in the economy and gain political power, we could slide towards the kind of Mafia state seen in the US during Prohibition, and in Russia, Italy, Mexico and Lebanon today. I can’t see any effective measures being deployed to stop this happening.
Read 7 tweets
2 Jan
This is a hazardous topic to discuss, as you immediately get accused of all sorts of things, but here goes.
I think the boundaries of free speech in this country are in the wrong place.
Thread/
Civil law in the UK goes to great lengths to protect people’s *reputations* against free speech, often with oppressive consequences, as the outcome of some recent defamation suits show. But the law does little to protect people’s *lives* against free speech.
There are exceptions: namely hate speech and the Cancer Act. But, to give one example, the outrageous lies told by certain influencers about vaccines kill people: those who believe them and therefore avoid vaccination have been more likely to die of Covid-19.
Read 7 tweets
1 Jan
Happy New Year everyone. Here’s our 2022 to-do list:
1. End the pandemic ASAP, so we can get on with the other stuff. So:
a. Encourage hesitant friends to get vaccinated
b. Demand ventilation systems in schools and venues, public test and trace and a properly funded NHS.
Thread/
2. Demand a commensurate response to the climate and environmental crisis: ie a WWII-sized industrial transition and global mobilisation.
I think the most important component is a complete transformation of the global food system (Regenesis, out in May, seeks to map this).
3. Fight tooth and nail against the new authoritarianism, embodied in the UK’s Police Bill, that would ban effective forms of protest, while legislatively cleansing Gypsies, Roma and Travellers. Demand that Labour opposes it in the Lords (instead of abstaining, ffs).
Read 7 tweets
31 Dec 21
Now it's winter wildfires in the US. How far do things have to go before governments recognise that crucial Earth systems might be reaching their tipping points? If so, we need to respond not with slow and steady carbon reduction plans, but with sudden and drastic action.
Otherwise, it's like announcing a plan, after Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008, to bail out the banks by 2050.
I'm going to keep saying this until it lodges:
If Earth systems are approaching their tipping points, current plans are far too little, far too late.
It's really hard to imagine what crossing a major Earth system threshold (a tipping point) would look like. But:
1. It will be orders of magnitude worse than anything we have ever experienced.
2. If one system tips, it could trigger a chain reaction, tipping other systems.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(