Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Sean W. Anthony Profile picture
@shahanSean
Jan 21, 2022 • 8 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
Some instances citations of Q. 112 from the Umayyad period below ...
P.Berol. 12825 (CPR III, no. 43), ca. 705-708
P. Br. Mus. 1515 (1) (CPR III, no. 35), 88ah/706+ad
P.Cair. Bibl. Ked. (CPR III 38), 708-9ad
P.Cair. Bibl. Ked. (CPR III 67), 709-10ad
PER Inv. Ar. P. 3976 (CPR III 65) 716-711 ad
PER Inv. Ar. P. 4004 (CPR III 73), undated
google.com/books/edition/…
Reform coinage of 'Abd al-Malik minted 77ah/696ad
jstor.org/stable/25769690

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Sean W. Anthony

Sean W. Anthony Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shahanSean

Sean W. Anthony Profile picture
Jul 19
My 2¢ on the ḥadīth scholarship vs. secular scholarship discourse
[1] Motzki (et al.) was mistaken to speak of the “authenticity” of the ḥadīth corpus, inasmuch as readers confused how he used authenticity with how ḥadīth scholarship uses words like ṣaḥīḥ, ḥasan, etc...
“Authentic” for him means “not forged by the compiler/tradent”; authenic ≠ historical veracity.
Motzki ran into this problem repeatedly, but the toothpaste couldn't be put back into the tube. ICMA aims at *dating*, not *verifying*, traditions. See his statement from our book. Image
Image
[2] From my outsider perspective, Muslim ḥadīth scholarship really aims at achieving one end – determining whether or not any given report meets the criteria to be regarded as authoritative for one’s dīn (belief, practice, etc.). The methods used by Muslims ...
Read 15 tweets
Sean W. Anthony Profile picture
Jun 5
In Q Ḥašr 59:23, God is called: al-muʾmin al-muhaymin. The first name, muʾmin|مؤمن, usually means “believer” but in this context probably means, “faithful,” or “granter of safety (ʾamn).” But what about the second term, al-Muhaymin? https://corpuscoranicum.de/en/manuscripts/32/page/56v?sura=59&verse=23
If you've studied Aramaic, the answer seems pretty straightforwoard: al-muhaymin is easily recognizeable as mhaymen|ܡܗܰܝܡܶܢ|מהימן.
It means the exact same thing as al-muʾmin, i.e., “believer” or “faithful”. https://www.dukhrana.com/lexicon/RPayneSmith/page.php?p=232
Theodore Nöldeke (1836-1930) noted the Aramaic background to al-Muhaymin, but surprisingly he did not find the word to be suitable adjective for the divinity, saying "there is not meaning in Aramaic which may be applied to God." https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.286210/page/27/mode/1up?view=theater
Read 8 tweets
Sean W. Anthony Profile picture
Mar 12
This is not the original quote of Hitler AFAIK, but the original does have an interesting history behind , and it's key for understanding the Battle of Poitiers in modern Western historical imaginary ...
Hitler’s "Tabletalk" (Tischgespräche) – ranting monologues given at the Führer headquarters from 1941-44 – were recorded and transcribed, and this is the source of such statements. In a monologue from 28 Aug 1942, he bemoans Charles Martel’s victory at Poitiers in 732 and ... Image
Chrisianity's hold over Europe. He then fantasizes about how Islam would have enabled the German race to conquer and subjugate the world. The English translation by Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens of 1953 appeared long before the German edition, ed. by W. Jochmann in 1980. Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Sean W. Anthony Profile picture
Dec 21, 2024
As noted by @IraniRoxanna, Khamenei is quoting one of the more misogynist passages from Nahj al-balāġah here, in Arabic: al-marʾah rayḥānah wa-laysat bi-qahramānah.
Personally, I don’t think ʿAlī actually uttered these words...
Why?
[1] It's strange forʿAlī to employ a word like qahramānah, a word borrowed into Arabic from Persian typically used in the Abbasid era to referred to an enslaved stewardess of a harem.
[2] The saying is attributed to other, later figures:
The one worth considering most seriously is Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ, one of the fathers of Arabic literary prose. He’s a key figure for the transmission of Persian and Indian gnomologia into Arabic literature. See the excerpt from Ibn Qutaybah’s ʿUyūn al-aḫbār below.https://archive.org/details/UyoonAkhbar/%D8%B9%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1-03/page/n271/mode/1up
Read 6 tweets
Sean W. Anthony Profile picture
Dec 10, 2024
Reading a new essay by Devin Stewart, "Ignoring the Bible in Qur’anic Studies Scholarship of the Late Twentieth Century" (2024). It's on the history of qur'anic studies scholarship in the 20th century and the place of biblical literatere therein. Some thoughts ...
Really it's an autopsy of what went wrong why the topic stagnated in qur'anic studies after WW2. He gives this example of Watt's revisions of Bell's Intro to the Qur'an as primary example of what changed. The language of the ToC speaks volumes.
scienceopen.com/hosted-documen…Image
I think people are too harsh on Watt, but his approach does strike me as minimizing and even censoring the rigorist, comparativist approach of older orientalist philology in favor of practicing scholarship as a way of making nice: For Watt (an Anglican priest) ...
Read 7 tweets
Sean W. Anthony Profile picture
Apr 24, 2024
Ehrman's right ofc, and the axiom isn't "hidden"
The Qur'an is a human text: it's written in a human language and as such ought to be analyzed as a product of humanity.
Ratifying a fideist "special pleading fallacy" as the foundation of your hermeneutic is against free inquiry
Truth be told, the aims of HCM are very modest--a measured, rationalistic approach to assessing the plausibility of our historical knowledge and revising it using empircal tools and methods. Most of the frustrations with it are, as you can see on display in the replies, ...
that it does not bow to or support grand claims about metaphysics or apodictic declarations about god, which its ardent detractors want to impose on the rest of us.
But seriously consider -- what new things have those infallible™ types told us about the ancient world ...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(