" Before 1918, the Congress had two groups — the Extremists (or Nationalists) and the Moderates (or Liberals). In 1907 the Extremists were driven out of the Congress, but in 1916 at the Lucknow Congress, a rapprochement was effected.
(1/n).
In 1918, the Moderates being outnumbered by the Extremists, seceded from the Congress and started the All-India Liberal Federation. The present leaders of the Liberal Party are Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru of Allahabad, Sir Chimanlal Setalvad and
Sir Pheroze Sethna of Bombay,
(2/n)
the Right Hon. V. Srinivasa Sastri and Sir Sivaswami Iyer of Madras, Mr. Chintamani of Allahabad, and Mr. J. N. Basu of Calcutta.
(3/n).
Among the present-day Congress leaders who are loyal supporters of the Mahatma, are Sardar Vallabhai Patel of Gujerat, Dr. M. A. Ansari of Delhi, Dr. Rajendra Prasad of Patna, Dr. Mohammed Alam and Sardar Sardul Singh of Lahore, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru of Allahabad,
(4/n).
Mr. Rajagopalachari of Madras,
Mrs. Sarojini Naidu, the celebrated poetess, Moulana Abul Kalam Azad of
Calcutta, Mr. Abhyankar of Nagpur, Mr. Jairamdas Daulatram of Karachi and
Dr. B. C, Roy of Calcutta.
(5/n).
Among them Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru's popularity is, by general consent, the highest."___Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose ( The Indian Struggle, page number 27).
(n/n).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
" Three days ago, when I should have normally written to you this letter, a heavy blow fell upon all of us and upon India .
(1/n).
We shall take a long time to recover from it and, even so, there will always be a sense of emptiness for those who had the privilege of knowing and working with Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.
(2/n).
The great ones pass, the warriors who led us in our struggle depart, and we all feel somewhat lonely and desolate. On those who remain, the burden and the responsibility grow heavier.
Debunking Myths and Lies about Jawaharlal Nehru regarding Jammu and Kashmir:
(1/n).
1. On Ceasefire:
Why India had a Ceasefire?
Nehru Government was advised by the Army for a ceasefire with Pakistan in 1948. It can be proved from the correspondence between Jawaharlal Nehru and then Commander- in - Chief , General Sir Francis Robert Roy Bucher.
(2/n).
In his message to Nehru dated 28 November 1948, Bucher warned of fatigue among Indian troops in Kashmir, adding that an “overall military decision was no longer possible”.
This meant that despite political independence, she was completely dependent on the advanced countries for achieving any economic growth though investment.
(2/n).
This was a neo-colonial type situation, which needed immediate remedy. And this is what the famous Nehru- Mahalonobis strategy tried to reverse by adopting a path of industrialization based on heavy industry or capital goods industry.
" The conflict is not essentially between the Arabs and the Jews. We must remember that the present problem of Palestine is of recent creation.
(1/n).
It has come into existence since the Great War and the responsibility for it must rest with the British Government, which made lavish promises to both the Arabs and the Jews during the war and sought to exploit both to their own advantage.
(2/n).
These promises were often mutually contradictory. Since the war it has not been love of the Jews that has moved the British Government but the desire to control an important route to India and the East.
See how cleverly Mr Distortion has hidden the word ‘Informally’.
For those who want to know the truth, the following quote is from Jawaharlal Nehru's note about his visit to the USSR on August 1, 1955.
On September 27, 1955, Nehru was asked a short notice question in this regard in Parliament by JN Parekh.
(2/n).
Parekh asked
"Will the Prime Minister be pleased to state;
(a) whether it is a fact that India has refused a seat informally offered to her in the Security Council of the United Nations; (b) if so, the reasons therefor;
"Whatever view one might take of the Agreement, one thing seems perfectly clear to me. Sardar Patel, in a very moving speech addressed to the Congress Party last evening, laid great stress on this aspect.
This is the fact that having arrived at this Agreement, both our honour and self-interest demand that we should implement it to the full. Not to do so would not only discredit us but harm us greatly.
To try to do so half-heartedly would be even worse, because we would get the discredit and no benefit at all. Therefore, even for those people who are not enthusiastic about the Agreement, the only right course is to work for its implementation.