🔴 Germany publishes the comments sent to the EU Commission on nuclear and gas in the #taxonomy 🔴
« If the delegated act remains unchanged and the Commission ignores the opinions of the Member States, including our own, Germany should reject it » bmuv.de/pressemitteilu…
« From the federal government's perspective, nuclear power is not sustainable. That is why we refuse to include it in the delegated act under the taxonomy regulation. »
« Serious accidents involving large-scale, transboundary and long-term damage to humans-being and the environment cannot be excluded. »
« New reactor concepts, such as Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), are not yet mature, pose similar problems and therefore cannot be considered sustainable »
« It is questionable whether the inclusion of nuclear power is compatible with the requirements of the taxonomy regulation »
« However, for the federal government, fossil gas used in state-of-the-art, efficient gas-fired power plants is, for a limited transition period a bridge to enable the rapid phase-out of coal and thus achieve short-term CO2 savings »
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Taxonomy} Experts of the Platform on #SustainableFinanceEU sent a negative opinion to the @EU_Commission on the inclusion of gas and nuclear
1/6
[Gas and nuclear] "activities could not be considered sustainable within the meaning of the Taxonomy Regulation."
2/6
On gas « Only the first criteria : a life-cycle GHG emissions from the generation of electricity using fossil gaseous fuels are lower than 100 g CO2e/kWh - ensures a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation from individual gas-fired energy facilities »
3/6