👂Hearing👂 A bit more on nuclear by @DanJoergensen (not very confortable with the question).

"I do support the principle of technology neutrality. But I dont think that the role of the EU is to fund the building of a new nuclear power plant."

🧵1/4 "The EU does fund nuclear activitiy but that is mostly research and training activities and I think that it is a sensible way of doing it." - @DanJoergensen 2/4

Non paper by 🇦🇹🇬🇷🇩🇰🇩🇪🇨🇾🇮🇪🇮🇹🇱🇺🇲🇹🇳🇱🇵🇹 ahead of the "friends of renewables" meeting tomorrow.
The 7-page document asks for "a post 2030 framework including a revision of the governance regulation covering the post-2030 as well as a revision of the Renewable Energy Directive" 1/4 The commission should "put forward a targeted legislative proposal for a Directive on the Acceleration of Permitting of RES and Energy Infrastructure" , it reads. 2/4

What's in the deal on #REMIT ?
🧵
ACER will have the right to investigate cases where the conduct affects at least 2 member states. 1/

https://twitter.com/AnnaHbrt/status/1725185874915102797

National regulatory authorities will continue to be able to object to the exercise of the agency’s investigatory powers when the NRAs have formally opened or have conducted an investigation on the same facts.
The NRAs will have a maximum of 3 months to object.
2/

What are the latest compromise proposals for Electricity market design reform ?
🧶THREAD 🧶 1/13

https://twitter.com/AnnaHbrt/status/1699838143531217310

All direct support schemes should take the form of contracts for the difference (CFD, contract with a fixed price, guaranteed by the state). This applies to nuclear, wind, solar and geothermal energy, as well as hydropower without reservoir.
2/13

Fit for 55 : the cases brought by 🇵🇱 before the European Court of Justice are published at the official journal of the EU. Lot's of details on what is wrong for Poland
1/4
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/…


According to 🇵🇱, the Commission :
- "has failed to fulfil the obligation to provide an adequate impact assessment"
- "has acted in breach of the principle of proportionality and the principle of equality of Member States" 2/4

⚡️Electricity market design ⚡️
The latest compromise of 🇸🇪 presidency limit the way CfDs can apply to existant (nuclear) plants.

The new investment must cover at least 50% of the economic value of the asset after investment, + prolonge the life-time by at least 10 years. 1/5



Still to please Germany and others, it also states that the level of the minimum remuneration protection (throught CfD) and of the upward limit to excess remuneration are proportionate to the cost of the new investment 2/5

Electricity market design ⚡️ European Parliament rapporteurs @nicogoncas and @mgracacarvalho have submitted their own amendements to the Commission proposal.
Main features here : 🧵
contexte.com/article/energi… ✅More detailed definition of contracts for difference (CFD). Among the criteria proposed: compatibility with the taxonomy; a location that avoids any risk of grid congestion; a penalty clause in the event that the producer decides to terminate the support scheme before its end.

🤓 For all those who wondered for weeks WHY the Slovakians were so enthousiastic about the Electricity market design consultation, the Commission "staff working document" sheds light 🤓
here energy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2…

1/4 (yes it's worth a thread) Slovaks participation in the EMD consultation is called “Slovakian campaign”, by the Commission.
«Almost all of the more than 550 responses from Slovakia appear to be part of a co-ordinated
campaign », reads the EU analysis
2/4

🚨 LEAK🚨Electricity market reform : @ContexteEnergie saw a draft non paper form the COMM explaining the « swift and targeted reform » in the pipelines 1/ " The Commission plans to propose the relevant targeted amendments to the electricity market design already in advance of the March 2023 European Council " 2/

Some news from ECT discussion between the 27 ambassadors yesterday night :
The modernisation process did not find the necessary qualified majority of EU states because there were no votes in favour from 🇩🇪🇫🇷🇪🇸🇳🇱
1/5 This means that there will be no majority for the modernised Treaty within the Conference of the Parties to the Energy Charter on the 24.11
2/5

❗️New compromise on Renewable permitting on the table❗️
Another (third!) text should emerged from today's ambassadors meeting (coreper). Adoption still scheduled for the 24.11
1/4 Among the lastest change :
👉The permit-granting process for the installation of heat pumps shall not exceed 1 month (instead of 3 in the Commission text) BUT, in case of ground source heat pumps three months. 2/3

The 🇪🇺 Commission also details its analysis of the French favoured option to cope with the Energy crisis : the iberian mecanism for gas price cap.
The non paper reads ⤵️ 1/5 On price cap level : "It is to be noted that at current gas price (about 60 EUR/MWh), this measure would not produce any results." 2/5

⚠️In a non paper seen by @ContexteEnergie the 🇪🇺 Commission details how decoupling electricity and gas prices could work. It could be an alternative to the iberian model. Here are the main quotes from it ⤵️ 1/n The paper reads "One Side of the Market: Remunerating Renewables and other Technologies Based on Their True Production Costs "
"Renewables and other types of inframarg. generators (nuclear) would be remunerated under contracts for diff. independently of the marginal price." 2/n

‼️.@EU_Commission will come up with « concrete options for the reform of market design » after @vonderleyen speech of the Union in Strasbourg on the 14.09, said @MWorsdorfer in front of the @EP_Industry this morning Other announcements by @EU_Commission this morning at the @Europarl_EN
- No proposal from the Commission before the extraordinary energy council of the 9.09 « there is not much we can prepare for that exept some factual update » 1/3

[Taxonomy} Experts of the Platform on #SustainableFinanceEU sent a negative opinion to the @EU_Commission on the inclusion of gas and nuclear
1/6 [Gas and nuclear] "activities could not be considered sustainable within the meaning of the Taxonomy Regulation."
2/6

🔴 Germany publishes the comments sent to the EU Commission on nuclear and gas in the #taxonomy 🔴
« If the delegated act remains unchanged and the Commission ignores the opinions of the Member States, including our own, Germany should reject it »
bmuv.de/pressemitteilu… « From the federal government's perspective, nuclear power is not sustainable. That is why we refuse to include it in the delegated act under the taxonomy regulation. »