Ongoing thread here re Russia, Ukraine, prospects for War & its consequences, and a certain #Realpolitik about the 'Russian way of war' .... noting you can find my #DragonBear comments elsewhere.
Firstly, good maps here from the NYT of current Russian military dispositions ivo Ukraine, the Baltics, Georgia, etal. Russia recovering the Crimea in 2014 enormously useful in all directions (as well as bases for logistics & Intelligence collection) nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Secondly, I did a whole thread here before Christmas on how the Russians approach war and statecraft (TL:DR there is a long historical method and very little that is surprising to anyone who reads & has basic common sense) ⬇️
Thirdly, I did a thread here on the problem of Ukraine from a Western military perspective: it is not in NATO & it was, historically, half Habsburg/half Romanov, so lacked historic cohesion .... cf historic nations like Poland(-Lithuania) and Hungary
Fourthly, NATO has no clear position because the Russians have the advantage of a strong military position vs few NATO members wanting to risk war over territories with significant Russian populations. Much of today's drama is the result of 1990s delusions re ex-Soviet Russians
Now, for the Kremlin, *IF* the Russians do invade Ukraine, then in quick time, Ukraine's battle is a magnet for every anti-Russian group .... so Europe will have a hot War in which ISIL, Ingushis, Dagestanis, Chechens, Uzbeks etal will all come to S-E Europe & likely never leave
Upshot of any war over Ukraine is not just Russia annexing eastern UKR where Russian populations live BUT a hot war (ivo major air transport corridors) but - much worse in many ways - a catastrophic refugee/illegal migration problem for the EU. This is obvious if not discussed.
So for the West, quite apart from Russia fighting to reunite its ethnic Russians, any war will have significant consequences for (1) global air movements/energy supplies given Ukraine is a warzone & (2) a massive flood of refugees heading West towards the EU's frontiers.
The average Eurocrat in Brussels (EU or NATO) is, rightly, more afraid of the Eurozone being swamped by a new tide of 'refugee' flows (during Covid & a severe winter) as a result of the Russians moving into eastern Ukraine than they are of Russia actually annexing half of Ukraine
War is uncertain and, whatever the intent is of those starting Wars, no War ever ends or proceeds as planned, but instead is full of 2nd and 3rd order effects that no combatant foresaw. War is best avoided & hopefully wiser heads can engage in negotiations & compromise.
I will add here that for those of us in the 'Indo Asia Pacific Security Domain' [or whatever it is called this week] concerned re China, our key allies such as India, Israel, the Gulf monarchies, etal, all have good to very good relations with the Russians. War comes with costs.
In terms of the actual war itself, the imbalance of forces between Russia & Ukraine is pretty ominous. Now, the UKR military will have improved since 2014 but, absent months of very bad weather, RUS' air & armour advantages are enormous (as well as practiced logistic resupply)
In terms of how a Russian invasion (even on a 'minor incursion' basis) proceeds, this plan & Indicators & Warnings done by @PhilipIngMBE is very sound. Only question is does the Kremlin use its Kaliningrad based forces/units adjacent north-east Poland to create any distractions?
Now, as I said, all War is unpredictable & even the best planning & preparation is at the mercy of weather & grave defects in what appeared to be competent military leadership that only became obvious once the War started. Good commanders can overcome adversity/bad ones create it
This said, the Russians have the only contemporary military to have had successive kinetic war successes over the past 30 years: Chechnya, Syria, Ukraine, etal. Russians will use speed, massive firepower, manoeuvre, and sow discord behind lines, to gain victory ... cf Kabul 2021
Will finish there as it is 2345 here and I want to think further on these matters. I think all of us are aware of the leadership & cognition problems in various Western capitals....hopefully someone in the 'deep state' (right now I want to believe one exists) is also thinking.
The RUS-UKR war plods along because neither RUS nor UKR have been fighting with great intensity - the UKR have no more men to waste while RUS has been fighting this war on the cheap for the better part of 2 plus years.
An interesting aspect of RUS' war effort is barely using regular RUS Army units after initial months, instead relying on a mix of:
- multiple Donetsk/Luhansk militia brigades (some fighting in their 11th year)
- Chechens
- Wagner / PMCs
- Russian Marines arena.org.au/reflections-on…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My #TartanDay thread for all who are celebrating & to all those with their familial ancestry in Scotland, or who, rightly, love the Scots as a people. 🏴
#TartanDay marks the anniversary of the 1320 Declaration of Arbroath made by the Scots Nobility & Clergy to the Pope: "It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom–for that alone which no honest man gives up but with life itself"🏴🇻🇦
"But from these countless evils we have been set free, by the help of Him Who though He afflicts yet heals and restores, by our most tireless Prince, King and Lord, the Lord Robert." #TartanDay 🏴🇻🇦
Disagree-the signs were there in the 1990s and not just in the US. It was always going to end when first world countries' populations saw open trade & borders as making them less secure not more secure. Making China part of the WTO (Blob conventional wisdom) guaranteed this
I have thought more on this - as I was a school and then university student in the 1990s - and yes there was a whole 'whither the globalised world order?' Thomas Friedman sort of midwit debate that went on then & you can find it in many books from the era
At the same time, the 1990s, for every Globalisation point, you had:
- former Yugoslavia with combatants periodically massacring each other
- Somalia & Rwanda, which had their own causes & body counts
- Soviet collapse & then the Russians fighting the Chechens and Dagestanis...
The problem of all Free Trade ideology for nation-states with real world responsibilities is its complete unrealism ... rather like open borders, free trade is utopian ... you cannot be a great or even regional power & rely overly on others supply to you in critical industries
Conservatism in the English speaking world, historically, was always Protectionist. The British Conservative Party & the GOP were historically for Protection and Tariffs (until Thatcher & the Bushs) - unchecked free trade & free markets were considered dangerous liberal heresies
The British Empire was almost destroyed for two World Wars by liberal Free Trade's slow gutting of British industrial capacity & but for Imperial Preference in the 1930s, there would have been few if any UK & Empire industries left for WW2 esp the Alone period of 1939-1941
This @Telegraph long read by @SAshworthHayes @CDP1882 on the UK's long-running rape (and in some cases murder) gang scandal is bracing reading and not for the squeamish. But it must be read - and acted upon.
Social media bill is another very poorly drafted law from the very same people who drafted the Voice constitutional alteration (which failed) & the Misinformation/Disinformation bill (which was withdrawn). Sheer lunacy for the Coalition to support the social media bill #Auspol
One of many problems we have with our Parliament in 2024 is its membership is simply not across how modern economies & communications work - you do not have to be any expert but you do need some lay understanding. One saw this in the Misinformation/Disinformation bill #Auspol
As a matter of public law - which binds everyone & should be as simple to follow as law can - the social media bill has ridiculous complexity & carve-outs ... and it is unreal to legislate on social media access separate from AI & exposure to its knowledge & also 'fakes' #Auspol
I am finally watching the @martyrmade / Tucker discussion on Churchill. I am not sure who among the critics have actually watched it. As I dislike Twitter pile-ons, I think everyone should watch what X says before X is put in the tumbril. My response as a Churchillian below.
Firstly, it astounds me (and no doubt many in the old Empire) why Americans in 2024 are so invested in the British Empire in the 1930s when the Americans of the 1939-1941 period wanted no part of WW2 & the US had to be bombed into WW2 & it was the Nazis who declared war on the US
Secondly, there is very little Darryl says that was not said earlier by many Revisionist historians of the same period, esp British ones wondering why they went through two continental wars that cost them their vast seaborne empire - cf Alan Clark, John Charmley, AJP Taylor etal