Paul Poast Profile picture
Jan 22, 2022 28 tweets 12 min read Read on X
The Ukraine crisis has folks questioning @NATO's post-Cold War expansion into Eastern Europe, especially former Soviet Republics (namely the Baltic states of 🇪🇪🇱🇹🇱🇻).

So how exactly did the Baltics get into NATO?

[THREAD] Image
Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia are currently the only former Soviet Republics in @NATO. They became members in 2004, along with Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Image
Regardless of whether there was a promise to never move NATO "one inch" eastward after the Cold War, neither the Soviets or the Americans, in 1990, likely envisioned NATO expanding into former Soviet Republics.
amazon.com/Not-One-Inch-P…
Russian President Boris Yeltsin had made Russia's opposition to such extreme expansion very clear. In a 1995 speech, he said:

"Those who insist on an expansion of NATO are making a major political mistake. The flames of war could burst out across the whole of Europe." Image
More explicitly, he said,

“I’m against NATO enlargement. When NATO approaches the borders of the Russian Federation, you can say that there will be two military blocs, and this will be a restoration of what we already had.”
US President Bill Clinton seemed to echo that message:

“We’re trying to promote security and stability in Europe. We don’t want to do anything that increases tensions” Image
But when the Baltic states gained independence from Russia in 1991, NATO membership was immediately a policy goal.

Indeed, the Lithuanian President was so bold as to directly "apply" for NATO membership via a letter (which had never been done).

(👇 is from the NATO archives) Image
As then Lithuania Minister of Defense Audrius Butkevičisus said in a later interview:

“What we needed was a vision for the impossible” Image
Fortunately for the Baltics, they were not alone in their desire to improve their security and *possibly* join @NATO (though no promises).

The Nordic countries, especially @NATO
member Denmark, was keen to help. Image
Denmark, along with the other Nordic countries, signed the "Mariehamn Declaration" in November 1991.

Below is an image of the Finnish version of the declaration (via the Finnish Parliament archives) Image
The declaration stated: “The Nordic countries should actively seek to influence European and other developments. . . in the Baltic Sea and Baltic region”

In other words, the former Soviet Republic Baltic states couldn't be left out on their own. Image
Denmark, as both a Nordic state and a @NATO
member, took the lead (particularly Danish Foreign Minister, Uffe Ellemann-Jensen)

The goal was for the Baltics, if possible, to enter @NATO. Image
Since immediate NATO membership was closed, a first step would be for the Baltics to demonstrate their "value added" as members.

By the mid-1990s, due to the Balkan Wars, NATO was focusing on deploying Peacekeeping operations. ImageImage
This presented an opportunity. Denmark, with help from the other Nordic Countries and a few other nations (namely the UK), Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania formed the Baltic Peacekeeping Battalion (BALTBAT). Image
BALTBAT allowed the Baltic states to accomplish three objectives.

First, it allowed them to receive Western supplies to begin rebuilding their military forces. As Garry Johnson, Commander-in-Chief of Allied Forces Northern Europe, said:

"They were starting from zero" Image
Second, it allowed the Baltics to gain training in an area that could be perceived as valuable to NATO (& also valuable to Russia, as maintaining peace in the Balkans was a priority). Indeed, their first deployment was alongside Denmark. Image
Third, it "signaled" to @NATO, namely the USA, that the Baltics could be "good citizens" if allowed in @NATO. As a 1999 editorial in the Norwegian paper @Aftenposten remarked, "BALTBAT almost functions as a preparatory school for NATO membership"
This set the stage for the Baltics to enter the "Partnership for Peace" and then the "Membership Action Plan" Image
Following the 9/11/2001 attacks on the United States and the start of the War in Afghanistan, the Baltics were eager to participate in ISAF ImageImage
So at the Prague NATO summit in 2002, the 19 NATO members voted to bring in the Baltic states. Here is the announcement in the official post-summit press release. Image
In some ways, the Baltic states pursued the same strategy as Turkey in the 1950s: take costly actions to demonstrate willingness to be a good NATO ally (which @mephenke describes in her book)
amazon.com/Constructing-A…
All of the above helped the US to no longer be concerned about Russian reactions to Baltic accession to NATO.
Indeed, US officials had changed their view on the issue by the late 1990s. As US deputy secretary of state Strobe Talbott remarked during a 1997 speech at @Stanford:

“Quite bluntly, the Russians need to get over the neuralgia on this subject [of Baltic membership]" Image
So that's how the Baltics "got in". As @AndrisBanka wrote in @WarOnTheRocks back in 2019: "The Baltic countries played their hand expertly"
warontherocks.com/2019/10/the-br…
A little help from Denmark, some fortunate circumstances, and a lot of foreign policy initiative made it possible for the Baltic states to be the first (and, in my view, the last) former Soviet Republics to enter NATO.

[END]
Addendum: If you think you've heard me tell this story before, I have!

It was part of my #NATO7for70 series back in 2019...
...it was the key case in my 2018 book with @jurpelai...
amazon.com/Organizing-Dem…
...and I had a chance to talk about it on the @Freakonomics podcast! Honestly, I just like saying "BALTBAT" :)
freakonomics.com/podcast/speak-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

Mar 23
Will nations ever give up "the bomb"? Will we ever live in a nuclear free world?

Probably not (but emphasis on "probably")

[THREAD] Image
There are essentially four categories of answers to the question of "will we live in a nuclear free world?":

1) yes, for encouraging reasons.

2) yes, for discouraging reasons.

3) no, for crazy reasons.

4) no, for sensible reasons.

Let's unpack each.
First, let's talk about the encouraging reasons for thinking we can be rid of nuclear weapons.
Read 31 tweets
Mar 16
Making Predictions.

Are International Relations scholars any good at it?

Yes, but it's important to know the limits.

[THREAD] Image
Forecasting and offering projections on future events has a long tradition in international relations. After all, if we are offering explanations of WHAT IS HAPPENING, that should offer insights into WHAT WILL HAPPEN.
oxfordbibliographies.com/display/docume…
Consider that failure to anticipate the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was considered by some a "failure" for IR scholarship, specifically Realism.
jstor.org/stable/2539129
Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 9
When studying war, what is a "Level of Analysis" and why should you care?

[THREAD] Image
In the latest @WarOnTheRocks Russia Contingency podcast, @KofmanMichael and I discuss the purpose and role of IR theory, specifically thinking about the War in Ukraine.

warontherocks.com/episode/therus…
One thing we discussed was the "level of analysis". This refers to a framework Kenneth Waltz introduced years ago in his book, Man, The State, and War

amazon.com/Man-State-War-…
Read 20 tweets
Mar 2
Will humanity ever convert all its "swords" to "plowshares"?

That is THE question international relations seeks to answer.

[THREAD] Image
The phrase "swords to plowshares" draws from the passage in the Book of Isaiah:

"They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more."
The phrase is commonly invoked to call for disarmament.

For instance, Dwight Eisenhower used the phrase in his farewell address (where also he famously invoked the phrase "Military-Industrial Complex").

archives.gov/milestone-docu…
Read 26 tweets
Feb 24
Peace is always positive, right?

Not necessarily. That's what Johan Galtung taught us.

[THREAD] Image
Galtung was truly a pioneer of the study of "peace research" (i.e. the field of social science that uses modern methodological tools to understand the causes and consequences of violent conflict).

amazon.com/Johan-Galtung-…
He was the founder of the Peace Research Institute Oslo...

prio.org
Read 24 tweets
Feb 17
Over the course of its War in Ukraine, Russia has:

- incurred massive loses of material and manpower.
- failed to achieve strategic objectives.
- endured economic hardship.

Despite all of that, it could still "win". Why?

[THREAD] Image
This 🧵 is particularly relevant given reports about Russian gains at Avdiivka.

reuters.com/world/europe/u…
More generally, I wrote a recent @WPReview piece how the war is on course to becoming a "Frozen Conflict" and that could benefit Russia.

worldpoliticsreview.com/ukraine-war-ru…
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(