I am really concerned to see this. A woman has been reported to Children’s Services because she has ‘transphobic’ views and thus may be causing harm to a child who ‘may’ be trans. Why do I think this is wrong?
1. The alleged ‘transphobia’ appears to be agreement with the statement that sex is real and it matters. This is not ‘transphobia’, this is a belief protected pursuant to the Equality Act as worthy of respect in a democratic society.
To say that a parent who holds this belief is likely to do harm to a gender questioning child is as discriminatory and wrong as saying a Muslim parent is likely to inflict FGM on a child.
2. The threshold for compulsory state intervention in a child’s life is ‘significant harm’ or the risk of. Of course we all have a duty to report concerns - but to do so on no evidence, or in furtherance of your political views, is a waste of scarce and valuable resources.
3. In my career I have made four safeguarding referrals. 2 related to individual and identifiable children and I took advice from senior colleagues before doing. 2 related to organisations - the NSPCC and Lush.
In every case I had clear evidence of my concerns which I set out, providing my name and contact details. And I would urge anyone with genuine concerns for a child to do the same.
But anyone who uses the threat of a report to Children’s Services, or who actually does this, on an irrational, unreasonable or malicious basis is not merely distracting attention from genuine cases of harm, but if they repeat this behaviour, are putting themselves at risk.
I think repeated malicious complaints are very likely to be a criminal matter. For parents in this situation, please stay calm. Social workers cannot ignore reports but equally they will not want to waste time on bogus ones.
If you do feel any social worker is motivated to investigate you for your protected belief, seek immediate legal help. I think it highly unlikely any investigation will proceed when a child is visibly healthy and happy, in a home that is clean and warm.
I am sorry for any child who feels rejected by their parents for their sexuality or gender expression. Their parents failed and that is a great sadness for all concerned. But that does not mean parents who don’t share your views about gender issues are automatically reportable.
Please exercise some degree of responsibility and restraint before expecting stretched and pressured front line services to be used as part of your political campaigning. If you care at all about children’s welfare you will see the sense in what I am saying.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Phillimore

Sarah Phillimore Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SVPhillimore

Jan 24
The police are out of control. Newport woman Jenni Swayne talks about her arrest yesterday. Over stickers. Held for 10 hours. api.substack.com/feed/podcast/6…
Felt a hand on her shoulder. Three police officers. Said she was educating people about gender politics. She refused to go to police station voluntarily. She tried to drive away in mobility scooter and drove over police officer's foot.
She has splints on her arm. They put her arm up her back and she screamed. She said she was not moving. They got a van. Hardly any room to fit her in. In the end she had to lie on her back.
Read 32 tweets
Dec 30, 2021
Here’s how we do it. We continue with a regime of criminal and civil law which protects people against abuse and harassment based on their physical characteristics or quasi religious belief - which is what a belief in gender identity is.
We continue with a regime of protection for people at work, who are allowed a peaceful working environment.

We continue to have open discussion about what to do when rights are in tension - what single sex spaces must be preserved? When are people compelled to use pronouns?
And most importantly of all, we encourage and support children who reject gender stereotypes without telling them that life long medication or surgery is the only option. We create a society where a boy doesn’t have to choose between his penis and a dress.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 29, 2021
While I very much welcome this admittance of their underhand tactics, I am baffled as to why they commit themselves to print.
Particularly the assertion that press exposure must be minimised as the ‘public’ are too misinformed to understand! I think the public understand only too well, is what you meant to say.
But it’s good to see Ryan Grim flying the flag for nominative determinism.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 29, 2021
A fantastic end to 2021 with @HarryTheOwl101 victory over the Hate Crimes Guidance. Let’s hope 2022 is just as interesting. We are not out of the woods yet.
My hopes for 2022
My dearest wish is that we will be able to call out such risible and offensive arguments without any fear whatsoever that we will be called ‘hateful’. And that such disgraceful trolling will become nothing but a dim and horrible memory.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 28, 2021
Narrator: she googled.

There are just over 3K videos for 'cis women' pleasuring themselves in toilets. About 1K more 'trans women'. However I doubt the effectiveness of 'Porn Hubs' search function as BOTH searches revealed top video to be very clearly a penis.
Broadening my search to simply auto erotic pleasure 'in public' shows 2,324 results for 'cis' women - but 2, 978 for 'trans women'.

Perhaps Scarlett is simply more expert in such searches. I will confess it is my first go and I am not tempted to gain any more expertise.
But I find this extremely interesting. As we chart the evolution of 'no debate' - through 'shut up', 'be kind', 'you must be mad', 'you are funded by the Right Wing' - again a new strategy emerges; a narrative that 'cis' women are inherently without sexual boundaries.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 28, 2021
Blaming a ‘media campaign’ for ‘transphobic rhetoric’ is absurd. The media were silent until it became clear that thousands of individuals were protesting against the removal of their most fundamental human right - to speak.
While of course I am grateful that journalists are now speaking up, let us never forget how - with some honourable exceptions - journalists were every bit as supine and captured as every other organisation.
And it took grassroots organisations to campaign and to resist and to demand that we have open and public discussion about very necessary issues - the erasure of the female sex and the harm done to children by medical transition.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(