The police are out of control. Newport woman Jenni Swayne talks about her arrest yesterday. Over stickers. Held for 10 hours. api.substack.com/feed/podcast/6…
Felt a hand on her shoulder. Three police officers. Said she was educating people about gender politics. She refused to go to police station voluntarily. She tried to drive away in mobility scooter and drove over police officer's foot.
She has splints on her arm. They put her arm up her back and she screamed. She said she was not moving. They got a van. Hardly any room to fit her in. In the end she had to lie on her back.
Police asked 'can you read and write' - 'I may be disabled and mentally ill but I have a Masters degree'
Arrested at 3.20pm. Watch and phone taken. Looked at her stickers in disapproval. Had no idea of time, in cell with no natural light.
JV - Harry Miller's victory seems to have no effect in Wales. Why is that?
JS - I don't know. Police officer's eyes looked dead, as if in a cult.
I said - you've been Stonewalled mate.
Still not questioned after 5 hours. Had no vegetarian food apart from curry so had cornflakes. Fell asleep. Solicitor very good. I said I am not going to give a no comment interview as I have done nothing wrong.
Solicitor says they have footage on CCTV of woman on mobility scooter putting up posters. He said the police accused her of putting broken glass under posters. I said 'bullshit'.
"This is dreadful. I would never hurt anyone. Ridiculous." Police came in and asked all sorts of shit questions, trying to get information about other people.
I can do whatever I like. I am on a pension. I have nothing to lose. I like educating. Letting people know.
The police have taken ALL her stickers. She's had donations so will create some leaflets and talk to people.
JV asks what authority the police have to make her stop stickering - they could be criminal damage and also flyposting is a criminal offence. But interesting to know what other flyposters get this treatment.
One sticker said 'cervix - its a woman thang'. Police said 'that's very hurtful'. she said 'HOW'.
She said 'I find 'cis' hurtful. Police took stickers from her home, didn't bring up the stickers about women being killed by DV. She said 'what the hell are you doing arresting me, rather than helping the women beaten by their partners'.
Hasn't got a clue what is going to happen to her next. All she knows is that for the next month she must be 'good' and the CPS will decide if there is a case to try.
(both JV and JS are not clear what law she has broken. Looks like police and solicitor have not explained well or at all. But the focus will be on the 'hate' rather than the flyposting.)
One of her stickers was above a 'Trans rights' stickers. They weren't bought in for questioning. Nor were any of the other people putting a variety of other stickers. They stay. Mine don't.
But you can't have one rule for me and another for everyone else.
JV - seems there is one rule for the vagina havers and another for the men who sticker freely.
She was questioned for 1-2 hours
JV 'you got the terrorist treatment here'.
Public order offence mentioned. Thinks this means she has 'upset people of a certain community'
Yes, those lying bastards who claim I put broken glass under the stickers.
I am disabled. No proper toilet facilities. No one seemed to know how to deal with it. I had to find my own way home, in the dark along the 6th most violent road in the UK, up a hill - with no phone. Police kept it.
If mobility scooter had broken down, I would have been stuck on the side of a hill. Couldn't turn light on. Luckily made it home.
Her duty solicitor had been on duty for 48 hours. But he got really into it and was laughing.
JV - did he tell you what to expect? He said he hadn't come across this before and was going to do some research. But I want my stickers back. It's a lot of work.
"How dare they dress someone up like me as a tub thumping twat" She has nothing to do with the right wing.
JV points out that 'public order offence' is obscure term. Should the police be running out arresting people who hurt feelings? 'Law has slipped into the domain of what was once the domain of priests'. We know where that leads.
JV - how can people help?
JS - lots of women doing excellent jobs writing to politicians, working in schools. A lot of skilled women and allies who are lobbying.
JV - this is so insane, what do we do?
JS - personally I think we should fucking riot
Pg 8 of Home Office leaflet about rights when detained. Provision of products for menstruation. If under 18 police will assign a female officer. Somehow - they know who women are.
JV - so they need to ask every single male if they need menstrual products.
JV - what can you suggest to people that we do about the authoritarianism at the heart of Welsh policing.
JS - TALK ABOUT IT

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Phillimore

Sarah Phillimore Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SVPhillimore

Jan 23
I am really concerned to see this. A woman has been reported to Children’s Services because she has ‘transphobic’ views and thus may be causing harm to a child who ‘may’ be trans. Why do I think this is wrong?
1. The alleged ‘transphobia’ appears to be agreement with the statement that sex is real and it matters. This is not ‘transphobia’, this is a belief protected pursuant to the Equality Act as worthy of respect in a democratic society.
To say that a parent who holds this belief is likely to do harm to a gender questioning child is as discriminatory and wrong as saying a Muslim parent is likely to inflict FGM on a child.
Read 11 tweets
Dec 30, 2021
Here’s how we do it. We continue with a regime of criminal and civil law which protects people against abuse and harassment based on their physical characteristics or quasi religious belief - which is what a belief in gender identity is.
We continue with a regime of protection for people at work, who are allowed a peaceful working environment.

We continue to have open discussion about what to do when rights are in tension - what single sex spaces must be preserved? When are people compelled to use pronouns?
And most importantly of all, we encourage and support children who reject gender stereotypes without telling them that life long medication or surgery is the only option. We create a society where a boy doesn’t have to choose between his penis and a dress.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 29, 2021
While I very much welcome this admittance of their underhand tactics, I am baffled as to why they commit themselves to print.
Particularly the assertion that press exposure must be minimised as the ‘public’ are too misinformed to understand! I think the public understand only too well, is what you meant to say.
But it’s good to see Ryan Grim flying the flag for nominative determinism.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 29, 2021
A fantastic end to 2021 with @HarryTheOwl101 victory over the Hate Crimes Guidance. Let’s hope 2022 is just as interesting. We are not out of the woods yet.
My hopes for 2022
My dearest wish is that we will be able to call out such risible and offensive arguments without any fear whatsoever that we will be called ‘hateful’. And that such disgraceful trolling will become nothing but a dim and horrible memory.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 28, 2021
Narrator: she googled.

There are just over 3K videos for 'cis women' pleasuring themselves in toilets. About 1K more 'trans women'. However I doubt the effectiveness of 'Porn Hubs' search function as BOTH searches revealed top video to be very clearly a penis.
Broadening my search to simply auto erotic pleasure 'in public' shows 2,324 results for 'cis' women - but 2, 978 for 'trans women'.

Perhaps Scarlett is simply more expert in such searches. I will confess it is my first go and I am not tempted to gain any more expertise.
But I find this extremely interesting. As we chart the evolution of 'no debate' - through 'shut up', 'be kind', 'you must be mad', 'you are funded by the Right Wing' - again a new strategy emerges; a narrative that 'cis' women are inherently without sexual boundaries.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 28, 2021
Blaming a ‘media campaign’ for ‘transphobic rhetoric’ is absurd. The media were silent until it became clear that thousands of individuals were protesting against the removal of their most fundamental human right - to speak.
While of course I am grateful that journalists are now speaking up, let us never forget how - with some honourable exceptions - journalists were every bit as supine and captured as every other organisation.
And it took grassroots organisations to campaign and to resist and to demand that we have open and public discussion about very necessary issues - the erasure of the female sex and the harm done to children by medical transition.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(