An Examination of the Potential Threat of a State-Sponsored Biological Attack Against the United States

2019 Master's Thesis

bearworks.missouristate.edu/cgi/viewconten…Image
Image
Image
Image
This section refers to:

China’s Biological Warfare Programme: An Integrative Study with Special Reference to Biological Weapons Capabilities (2015) by Danny Shoham

idsa.in/jds/9_2_2015_C…

PDF

idsa.in/system/files/j… Image
The author of the Master's Thesis, Corey Pfluke wrote a summarised version of her section on China in 2020:

Biohazard: A Look at China’s Biological Capabilities and the Recent Coronavirus Outbreak

airuniversity.af.edu/Wild-Blue-Yond…
"Although assessing China’s military capabilities is notoriously difficult due to the secrecy & opacity its institutions maintain, a combination of historical records, assessments, & studies provide a view of China’s BW programme, this view is unsettling"
orfonline.org/expert-speak/a…
An Indian Perspective (Part 1)

AN ASSESSMENT OF CHINA’S BIOLOGICAL WARFARE CAPABILITIES AND NEED FOR GLOBAL APPROACH TO BIO-SECURITY

researchgate.net/publication/34…
An Indian Perspective (Part 2)

AN ASSESSMENT OF CHINA’S BIOLOGICAL WARFARE CAPABILITIES AND NEED FOR GLOBAL APPROACH TO BIO-SECURITY

researchgate.net/publication/34…
An important Reference is a paper by Croddy (2002 )

(a little dated but with many useful references to suspected facilities)

including the Wuhan Institute of Biological Products

(WIBP..next door to the WIV BSL4 Complex in Jingxia)

nonproliferation.org/wp-content/upl…Image
Image
Hence my tweet yesterday



and

"126 tedious WIBP supply documents translated

A minor victory!"
Essential Background Reading on WIBP

Published by DRASTIC a year ago

researchgate.net/publication/35…
Referenced in the Taiwan News by @keverington

taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4137284
Another article by Dany Shoham focusing on the Canadian-Tianjin Angle:

China's Biological Warfare Programme and the Curious Case of Dr. Xiangguo Qiu (2019)

idsa.in/cbwmagazine/ch…

x.com/BillyBostickso…
The Radosavljevic–Belojevic method for outbreak scoring & differentiation shows that the official assumption of its natural origin is questionable and highlights the probability that the pathogen may have been "accidentally" introduced to humans

researchgate.net/publication/35…
“The genomic origin of the strain that infected patient zero was a Chinese bat virus that underwent extensive pre-adaptation to humans, including continual transmissibility..
“The open question is how, where, and when such exceptional genomic pre-adaptation took place” Image
One possibility is that a wild-type virus was 1st propagated repeatedly in human tissue cultures & the resulting spontaneously upgraded virus was then used to experimentally infect monkeys or ferrets—one of which then accidentally infected staff in the lab
jns.org/opinion/where-…
An interesting observation

"The WIV has long been routinely supplied with rhesus monkeys from the Macaque Breeding Base in Suizhou City"

Note the references have been deleted:
safeboxasia.com/en/center/inde…
and
safeboxasia.com/en/news/info_9…

and replaced with chinese lottery website! Image
Image
Top Gene Bio's new cleaned website

topgenebio.com

Facebook Page:

facebook.com/topgenebio/

Invite you to search
Snapshots Image
Image
Image
Image
20,000 Caged rats and mice

800 + Monkeys Image
1300 Types of genetically engineered mice
300 types of genetically engineered rats Image
A well known supplier of Monkeys.... Image
"Business Segment" Image
Taking a break, to be continued.
The "chinese lottery" website can actually be accessed in all its tedious glory by installing a noscript extensión

safeboxasia.com/cn/animal/list…Image
You may be wondering why this thread has diverged into Chinese monkey breeding minutia...

Reason being that any putative Chinese BW program would require monkeys for experiments, as was the case in USA & UK (Operation Cauldron)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation…

bbc.com/news/uk-englan…
Operation Cauldron Film:

The trials were conducted by scientists from Porton Down in Wiltshire. About 3,500 monkeys and guinea pigs were killed after exposure to "plague bombs"

archive.org/details/Operat…

and

vimeo.com/50042014 Image
Image
Image
Operation Cauldron, The Stuff of Monkey Nightmares

More Chinese Monkey Research and Breeding Programs to come tomorrow
5 species of primates are used in China for biomedical research
2 species, crab-eating macaque & common marmoset are alien
3 species, pigtail, stumptail & rhesus macaques, are indigenous
Those used for biomedical research are crab-eating & rhesus macaques
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22179…
The following information on monkey breeding centres in China is from 2001.

There have been some changes...

For example, Hubei Topgene Biotechnology, the new supplier to WIV and WIBP was not listed 20 years ago. Image
Image
Image
Tables in previous tweet are from

Chinese Primate Status and Primate Captive Breeding for Biomedical Research in China

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22179…
From 2004, another table offers more information

Highlighted is Laboratory Animal Center of Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences in Beijing

From:

Notice of State Forestry Administration on Strengthening the Management of Experimental Monkeys

archive.ph/fIzFxImage
Image
To be continued..Homework

China has become the Mecca for those deluded Chinese & Foreign Researchers keen to abuse monkeys on the altar of Science.

While author Xin Hao gloats over low labor costs

Monkey Research in China
Developing a Natural Resource

cell.com/fulltext/S0092…Image
Image
Image
Please Note

This thread is an investigation of the breeding centres, laboratory research evidence, logistics and locations of possible Biological Warfare research in China using non human primates.

It may lead nowhere or it might lead somewhere, that remains to be determined. Image
unroll @threadreaderapp
save @rattibha
@reSeeIt save thread
save @buzz_chronicles

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓

Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BillyBostickson

Nov 12
✴️MICROPLASTICS IN YOUR BRAIN?

1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED

"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."

msn.com/en-us/health/o…
✴️3. NONE WERE FREE

"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Read 23 tweets
Nov 6
🧵1. In the interview with @danaparish

Redfield stresses that the evidence points to lab creation for a reusable, aerosolized vaccine vector, with US complicity in funding/tech.

He says he is fed up with the cover-ups and predicts that full intel release would confirm this.
🧵2. Proof?

Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements

(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)

He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.

He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
Read 21 tweets
Oct 30
🧵1. Critique of preprint: SARS-COV-2 like FCS hype

Media article 1

dailymail.co.uk/health/article…

Media article 2

straitstimes.com/world/coronavi…
🧵2. The Authors State:

"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."

biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
🧵3. Two fatal flaws: Overreach & Undermine

A. The authors of this study on the BRZ batCoV from Brazil unfortunately overreach themselves when they connect it to SARS-CoV-2 origins.

B. The FCS evidence actually undermines the flawed hypothesis of direct bat to human emergence!
Read 13 tweets
Oct 25
🧵1. Honest question

Did you try to read my pangolin coronavirus report but gave up because it was too long or too complex?

If you didn't see it, link is in next tweet

Help is at hand!

Thanks to Google's pretty amazing "notebook lm"

A video explainer

notebooklm.google.com/notebook/1b843…
🧵2. Just in case..

The massive report is here:

researchgate.net/publication/39…
🧵3. An updated brief explanation on Medium

The Pangolin-Mediated Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2

medium.com/p/the-pangolin…
Read 8 tweets
Oct 4
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"

usrtk.org/wp-content/upl…
2. Hypothetical Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2

Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)

page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:

Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site
Read 15 tweets
Sep 11
1. "We’ll be seen as spies, not scientists.”

x.com/emilyakopp/sta…

Daszak "seems" confused when questioned BY @RepJamesComer whether he ever worked with, or for, spooks.

Unsurprisingly in light of what is shown on page 79 of the DRASTIC EHA files

researchgate.net/publication/39… x.com/Dylan_Housman/…Image
2. He may claim it was post pandemic contact

But thanks to @AGHuff we know it went back quite a while, at least to 2015.

@AGHuff 3. More questions from @NameIsSpartacus

We need to find out why Peter Daszak & EcoHealth had In-Q-Tel backing and why Nathan Wolfe (an obvious intelligence asset with links to Epstein/Maxwell, Boris Nikolic, and Bill Gates) was on their editorial board.

Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(