This paper came out months after my preprint osf.io/2egsm/ but 2 weeks before my paper doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.… where I claimed T cell memory was contributing to harm in covid
It's cited 33 times and mine only 2
Balloux has made me self conscious about my H index lol
It's got such a feel-good title, "T cells- Warriors of sars cov 2 infection" Monica Gandhi even cited it by name about T cells in cov 2 infection
She must not have read it, lol, because it says the same thing I did, that memory t cells were harming pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33277181/
Next time I will be smart about making my write-ups more optimistic and accessible. It's got great paragraph headers.
Let's compare the paper to my preprint (left) in October 2020. we both discuss the lymphopenia, but I go straight to CD95 due to it's role, while they expanded on the pandemic and it's impact beforehand
we then discuss the aetological role of pathogenesis the cytokine storm may have. I claim it is not so clear on the left, and begin to implicate t cells
We both discuss the loss of Tregs AND the hyperactivation of T cells (mine are first 2)
We also both discuss the protection seen from Naive T cells as shown by Moderbacher et al. but I think they do not use this source.
And of course we both depict memory cells are contributing to more severity. Mine on left
We both agree that the memory t cells are contributing to disease through their function- killing cells. They claim bystander activation, I claim superantigenic activation (left)
In August an immunologist declared the "Leonardi Effect" had received a "decent burial"
Fast forward to today: a new preprint shows what I warned about in 2020
Persistent SARS-CoV-2-induced impairment of CD8 T cell responses to community-acquired pathogens
I was right 1/5
Key finding: Post-COVID patients show markedly reduced T cell reactivity to common pathogens (influenza, Staph, VCZ) which is evidence of lasting immune dysregulation favoring secondary infections and viral reactivation
@Bryce_Nickels This is absolutely false because he made a “noble lie” and said the N 95s would not work for the public to the public in order for there to be greater supply to healthcare workers only. This backfired.
@Bryce_Nickels The ethical approach was the truth. This is a similar noble lie by omission that the WHO made when they refused to declare Covid as airborne in order for impoverished health systems to provide “adequate” PPE per their regulations according to WHO standards
@Bryce_Nickels The end result was workers in impoverished systems were being given “adequate “PPE for droplet transmission, and many of them died, including sadly many in New York City.