I can not only confirm this phenomenon, but can confirm it happened before, in I think 2008-9. After the financial crash, there was a sudden rise in food prices. All the supermarkets immediately removed the "value" ranges from the shelves.
2/
This appeared to be to stop shoppers buying the "value" ranged products, instead of the standard range of products, which had just shot up in price. It was definitely not that they ran out. One day the shelves were full of these products, the next day they were gone.
3/
For many years after neoliberal policy started to be implemented, the less well off, those on low wages or benefits, have only been able to survive, by relying on these value ranges in supermarkets. They can be as much as 3 times cheaper.
4/
Therefore there has for a long time been a whole demographic in Britain, who could only afford to buy food by relying on these much cheaper range of foods and household products.
5/
This has meant that long before the current massive use of Food Banks, that the poorer members of society, have only been able to survive by buying these cheaper range of foods and household products.
6/
This was a perilous situation, because if these ranges were suddenly withdrawn by supermarkets, the poorest people in society, would suddenly be forced to pay 300% or sometimes more for staple items. Not the 10-20% ordinary shoppers faced.
7/
Another phenomena I noticed was that until 2009, it was possible to live incredibly cheaply on a vegetarian diet, because pulses (dried beans) were very cheap, and so were root vegetables. In 2009, they drastically rose in price, up to 200%.
8/
Unlike other food prices that settled back to nearer previous price levels, dried pulses stayed at very high levels, at least twice the former price. It is now bizarrely cheaper to buy tins of pre-cooked pulses, than dried pulses.
9/
From what I can make out, the only reason for this was that TV chefs suddenly made vegetarian food, trendy. I find it impossible to believe that equivalent weight of vegetarian foods, can cost more than the equivalent weight of the cheapest meat.
10/
For example you can buy 1 kilo of cooking bacon (off cuts) for £1.45, and the equivalent weight of dried pulses, will be typically over £2. Similarly vegetarian burgers etc, are more expensive than actual meat products.
11/
Animals are inefficient converters of food such as pulses and grains, fed to them, in terms of meat produced. Estimates for this vary between 2x-25x in meat:feed ratios. 12/ awellfedworld.org/feed-ratios/
Therefore it is absolutely inexplicable that the same pulses, say soya, fed to animals, where it can take 10kg of soya, to produce 1kg meat, can be more expensive than the meat to shoppers. There is clearly some sort of price fixing, subsidies element going on here.
13/
I only make this point to bring in the climate crisis and sustainability, where it is well known that the biggest single contribution a person could make to lowering carbon emissions is to eat less/no meat.
14/
@BootstrapCook has made an extraordinary personal contribution to the wider understanding of the plight of the poorer section of the British public, and their ability to feed themselves, and the challenges they face. Few others were articulating this.
15/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am putting my thread written spontaneously underneath @GeorgeMonbiot's tweet, which is focused fury, in a proper thread. This is so it can be read like thread. Although I won't be able to number it, so look for unroll at the end. There's a few additional tweets.
This is the most abominable act of ecocide I have ever heard of. The equivalent of human genocide, but on our life support systems. Deliberate ecocide, rather than inadvertent ecocide through stupidity, is the most EVIL act imaginable. It is genocide of future generations.
I do not use these terms lightly. When European colonists first reached the Americas, they waged constant ecocide against the native inhabitants. Simply because they had a deep attachment to the land and wouldn't yield to them. so they tried to exterminate their whole culture.
@peterwalker99 The Mail is running a dishonest propaganda campaign against cyclists. It's trying to tell people the new Highway Code overhauls are introducing new rules. This is a total lie, this is how it was when I took my driving test in 1977. 1/ dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Everyone of these so called knew rules were as taught to me in my driving lessons, and I was clearly told failure to adhere to them, or failing to explain this to the examiner in your driving test, would result in you failing your driving test.
2/
It's deliberately trying to whip up hatred against cyclists. Just look at the comments under the article.
3/
Historical precedent is probably the most important indicator of what is possible and what isn't. The only historical precedent in fairly modern times of economies being suspended for the common good is WW2. I'm not a fan of war analogies, but that is all we've got to go on. 1/
As I say war analogies aren't ideal. The objectives and implementation were different. But it is an example of how the economic model can be put on hold, and the public actually come together to work for the common good.
2/
Most of the technology we take for granted, arose out of WW2. Jets, electronic computers, antibiotics, radar, sonar, even rockets etc, if you count the German side. Many had origins before, but they were never put into full scale use, until necessity produced them.
3/
@DoctorVive has hit the nail on the head, because it is essential all of us understand this. The present system, which arose out of the industrial revolution, which was designed on purpose, was a profound mistake, based on entirely false assumptions about our world.
1/🧵
Any full acknowledgement of the climate and ecological emergency, not just the science, but how the system, which caused it started, is profoundly subversive. It totally undermines the powerful and wealthy who rule over us. It says that full system change is essential.
2/
The present system, which as I say, arose out of the industrial revolution, is entirely based on one false assumption - eternal economic growth.
You cannot have eternal growth on a finite planet. But the false assumption is you can!
3/
I'd like to use this point to illustrate why the claim that all people are responsible for the climate and ecological emergency, through their consumption, behaviour and the governments they elect, is a monstrous false argument and misrepresentation of the facts.
1/🧵
As rightly noted, those without a sympathetic employer (and most aren't) or wealth i.e. most of the population, have to keep in the rat race driving the crisis, just to keep their heads above water. This includes voting for a government most likely to keep them in work.
2/
This is not just about time off to protest. It's about the ability to make alterations to your lifestyle, or the government you vote for, because most are just trying to keep their head above water.
3/
Once more I ask why aren't Boris Johnson and others being investigation for perverting the course of justice by the @metpoliceuk, for lying about these social gatherings in Downing Street? 1/
Former cabinet minister Chris Huhne was convicted of perverting the course of justice, and given an 8 month prison sentence for simply lying to avoid a speeding ticket, and getting his then wife to say she was driving at the time, 10 years earlier. 2/ independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
This proves no matter how trivial the original offence is, if you lie to avoid conviction you are guilty of perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, and nearly always results in a prison sentence.
3/